Holland 진로성격유형에 따른 미용전공 대학생의 전공만족도 및 진로성숙도 분석
Analysis of Major Satisfaction and Career Maturity Degree of University Students Majoring in Beauty According to Holland Occupational Personality Types
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study was conducted to find out difference of major satisfaction and career maturity degree according to Holland Occupational Personality Types targeting university students majoring in beauty. For this, aiming at 355 enrolled students majoring in beauty in Seoul and Gyeonggi-province from May 1 to 30, 2014, a survey was implemented with Holland Code Career Test and a questionnaire which was made for the purpose of the study. For data analysis, SPSS 18.0, exploratory factor analysis, principal components analysis, and varimax method were used. For the difference of major satisfaction and career maturity degree, ANOVA was conducted. At the result of conducting Duncan test, in the measurement of the Holland Occupational Personality Types of the university students majoring in beauty, it could be seen that rates of “Artistic” 111 students (32.2%) proper to creativity and art field and “Social” 87 students (25.2%) excellent in social, educational leadership and interpersonal relationship ability were a lot. In major satisfaction per Holland Occupational Personality Type, lecture satisfaction, subject satisfaction, awareness satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction showed significant differences (p<.001). Types of Artistic (M=4.05), Social (M=3.78), and Realistic (M=3.42) were represented in order. Meanwhile, it could be known that the case of Investigative (M=3.22) was presented the lowest. Also, at the result of looking into the difference with career maturity degree, about factors of planning, reality, determinacy, and independence, there was significant different statistically (p<.001). Types of Artistic (M=3.90) and Social (M=3.65) were shown in order. On the other hand, the case of Conventional (M=3.44) was represented the lowest. Therefore, based on the data about significant difference by each occupational personality type, if career preparation and counsel directions are suggested, it is believed that career plans of more efficient self-satisfaction will be sought for.
Abstract
This study was conducted to find out difference of major satisfaction and career maturity degree according to Holland Occupational Personality Types targeting university students majoring in beauty. For this, aiming at 355 enrolled students majoring in beauty in Seoul and Gyeonggi-province from May 1 to 30, 2014, a survey was implemented with Holland Code Career Test and a questionnaire which was made for the purpose of the study. For data analysis, SPSS 18.0, exploratory factor analysis, principal components analysis, and varimax method were used. For the difference of major satisfaction and career maturity degree, ANOVA was conducted. At the result of conducting Duncan test, in the measurement of the Holland Occupational Personality Types of the university students majoring in beauty, it could be seen that rates of “Artistic” 111 students (32.2%) proper to creativity and art field and “Social” 87 students (25.2%) excellent in social, educational leadership and interpersonal relationship ability were a lot. In major satisfaction per Holland Occupational Personality Type, lecture satisfaction, subject satisfaction, awareness satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction showed significant differences (p<.001). Types of Artistic (M=4.05), Social (M=3.78), and Realistic (M=3.42) were represented in order. Meanwhile, it could be known that the case of Investigative (M=3.22) was presented the lowest. Also, at the result of looking into the difference with career maturity degree, about factors of planning, reality, determinacy, and independence, there was significant different statistically (p<.001). Types of Artistic (M=3.90) and Social (M=3.65) were shown in order. On the other hand, the case of Conventional (M=3.44) was represented the lowest. Therefore, based on the data about significant difference by each occupational personality type, if career preparation and counsel directions are suggested, it is believed that career plans of more efficient self-satisfaction will be sought for.
참고문헌 (30)
- 김영미, "진로성격유형별 성취목표·학습기술·학업성취간의 관계탐색", 박사, 교육학과 교육심리전공, pp.2013
- 김혜주, "대학생의 전공만족과 몰입경험이 진로 결정 효능감 및 진로 태도 성숙에 미치는 영향", 석사, 상담교육, pp.2007
- 김병진, "홀랜드식 검사에 의한 직업유형 일치정도와 직무만족 및 직무성취와의 관계", 박사, 교육심리및교육과정, pp.2008
- 김미경, "충북대학교 토목공학과 학생의 직업유형과 진로선택의 분석 : 홀랜드식 적성탐색검사", 석사, 토목공학전공, pp.2012
- 김봉환, "학교진로상담" (2000), 학지사
- 구남희, "Holland의 진로유형에 따른 진로의사결정 특징에 관한 연구", 석사, 교육학, pp.1997
- 고향자, "한국 대학생의 의사결정유형과 진로결정수준의 분석 및 진로결정상담의 효과", 박사, pp.1993
- 박형규, "고등학교 학생들의 Holland의 직업적 성격과 직업가치관과의 관계 분석", 석사, 상담심리, pp.2000
- 심은숙, "대학생의 성별, 학년별 전공학과 만족도 및 학과인기도에 따른 진로성숙수준의 차이 분석", 석사, 학교상담, pp.2003
- 서민화, "고등학생의 전공 학업성취도 및 전공만족도 상하집단 판별요인 탐색", 박사, 교육심리및교육과정, pp.2011
- 정희영, "미용전공 대학생의 가치관과 자기효능감에 따른 전공만족도 및 진로성숙도에 관한 연구", 박사, 패션ㆍ뷰티마케팅, pp.2010
- 장대운, "청소년 진로상담" (1996), 청소년 대화의 광장
- 정희영, "미용전공 대학생의 직업가치관이 진로성숙도에 미치는 영향", 한국미용학회지, 19(3), pp.466~474 (2013), 한국미용학회
- 최은주, "진로의사결정 및 진로성숙도에 미치는 영향", 한국인체미용예술학회지, 13(3), pp.45~58 (2012), 한국인체미용예술학회
- 최상권, "경호학전공 대학생들의 가치관과 전공선택 동기 및 전공만족도의 관계", 석사, 안전관리전공, pp.2012
- 하혜숙, "대학생의 전공학과 만족과 학교만족에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1999
- 안창규, "진로탐색검사의 표준화를 위한 연구", 한국심리학회지 : 상담과 심리치료, 8, pp.169~200 (1996)
- 안창규, "Holland 적성탐색검사" (2007), 한국가이던스
- 이기학, "고등학생의 진로태도성숙과 심리적 변인들과의 관계 : 자아존중감, 직업가치, 내외통제성을 중심으로", 박사, 심리학, pp.1997
- 이길수, "학업적 자기효능감 및 5요인 성격특성과 진로성숙도와의 관계", 석사, 학교상담, pp.2004
- 이종승, "HOLLAND의 직업적 성격유형론 탐구", 교육학연구, 41(3), pp.1~18 (2003), 한국교육학회
- Super DE, "A theory of vocational development", Am. Psy, 8, pp.185~190 (1953)
- Crites JO, "Theory and research handbook for the Career Maturity Inventory", pp.1978, CTB
- Nunnally JC, "Psychometric theory" (1978), McGraw Hil
- Harre R, "The encyclopedic dictionary of psychology" (1983), MIT Press
- Camp CC, "A comparison and evaluation of interest congruence indices", Jourmal of Vocational Behavior, 41, pp.162~182 (1992)
- Spokane A., "A review of research on person-environment congruence in Holland’s theory of careers", Journal of vocational Behavior, 26, pp.306~348 (1985)
- Holland JL, "Professional manual for the self-directed search" (1979), Consulting Psychologists
- Holland JL, "Making vocational choice: A theory of vocational personality and work environment" (1985), Prentice-Hall
- "통계청"[URL]