반자율주행 차량의 제어권 전환 요청(TOR) 인터랙션 디자인 연구 : HDD와 HUD 비교 실험을 중심으로
Interaction Design of Take-Over Request for Semi-Autonomous Driving Vehicle: Comparative Experiment between HDD and HUD
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
완전 자율주행 단계에 이르기 전까지 부분 자율주행 차량에서는 시스템이 특정 상황에서 운전자에게 직접 운전을 하도록 요청하는 제어권 전환 요청(TOR)이 필수적이다. 이 연구의 목적은 인간-자동차 인터랙션 방식 중 HDD(Head-Down Display)보다 HUD(Head-Up Display)가 제어권 전환 요청 시 사용자 경험 인식에서 더 유리한지 비교하는 것이다. 운전 시뮬레이터 실험을 통해 참가자가 자율주행 상황에서 부가적 과업인 게임을 하다가 제어권 전환 요청을 인지하면 직접 운전을 수행하도록 하였다. 실험 결과, 반응시간과 주관적 작업 부하에서는 차이가 없었으나, ‘사용 용이성'과 ‘만족도’에서 HUD 방식이 HDD보다 더 우수한 것으로 나타났다. 자율 주행시 HUD를 통해 부가적 과업을 하도록 디자인하는 것이 제어권 전환 요청 기능의 사용자 경험을 개선하는 효과가 있었다. 이 연구는 자율주행 맥락에서의 사용자 경험 디자인 가이드라인 설정을 위한 실증 사례를 제시했다는 점에서 의의가 있다.
Abstract
In the semi-autonomous vehicle, before reaching a fully autonomous driving stage, it is imperative for the system to issue a take-over request(TOR) that asks a driver to operate manually in a specific situation. The purpose of this study is to compare whether head-up display(HUD) is a better human-vehicle interaction than head-down display(HUD) in the event of TOR. Upon recognition of TOR in the experiment with a driving simulator, participants were prompted to switch over to manual driving after performing a secondart task, that is, playing a game, while in auto-driving mode. The results show that HUD is superior to HDD in ‘ease of use’ and ‘satisfaction’ although there is no significant difference in reaction time and subjective workload. Therefore, designing secondary tasks through HUD during autonomous driving situation improves the user experience of the TOR function. The implication of this study lies in the establishing an empirical case for setting up UX design guidelines for autonomous driving context.
참고문헌 (24)
- Carsten, O., "Control task substitution in semi-automated driving: Does it matter what aspects are automated?", Human factors, 54(5) (2012)
- Chapman, P. R., "Visual search of driving situations: Danger and experience", Perception, 27(8) (1998)
- Eriksson, A., "Rolling out the red (and green) carpet: supporting driver decision making in automation-to-manual transitions", IEEE Transactions on Human Machine System (2017)
- Horrey, W. J., "In-Vehicle Glance Duration", Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (1), pp.2007~ (2018)
- Lund, A. M., "Measuring usability with the use questionnaire 12", Usability interface, 8(2), pp.3~6 (2001)
- Merat, N., "Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state", Human factors, 54(5) (2012)
- Naujoks, F., "The effect of urgency of take-over requests during highly automated driving under distraction conditions", Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation, 7(1) (2014)
- Petermeijer, S., "Take-over again: Investigating multimodal and directional TORs to get the driver back into the loop", Applied ergonomics, 62 (2017)
- Pettersson, I., "Setting the stage for autonomous cars: a pilot study of future autonomous driving experiences", IET intelligent transport systems, 9(7) (2015)
- Stanton, N. A., "Automating the driver's control tasks", International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 5(3) (2001)
- Underwood, G., "Visual attention and the transition from novice to advanced driver", Ergonomics, 50(8) (2007)
- Zeeb, K., "What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving", Accident Analysis & Prevention, 78 (2015)
- Zeeb, K., "Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving", Accident Analysis & Prevention, 92 (2016)
- Bahram, M., "Please take over! An analysis and strategy for a driver take over request during autonomous driving", 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (2015)
- Borojeni, S. S., "Assisting drivers with ambient take-over requests in highly automated driving", Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (2016)
- Gold, C., "“Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?", Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 57(1) (2013)
- Hart, S. G., "NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later", Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, 50(9) (2006)
- Langlois, S., "Augmented reality versus classical HUD to take over from automated driving: An aid to smooth reactions and to anticipate maneuvers", 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference (2016), Intelligent Transportation Systems(ITSC)
- Maulsby, D., "Prototyping an intelligent agent through Wizard of Oz", Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems -CHI 93 (1993)
- Neubauer, C., "The effects of cell phone use and automation on driver performance and subjective state in simulated driving", Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56(1) (2012)
- Politis, I., "Evaluating multimodal driver displays of varying urgency", Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (2013)
- Radlmayr, J., "How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving", Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 58(1) (2014)
- "국제자동차기술자협회(SAE)"[URL]
- "Why Uber's self-driving car killed a pedestrian"[URL]