嘉靖年間 東南沿海社會와 月港의 開放
Southeast Costal Society under the Jiajing Reign and the Opening of Yue-Gang
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study presumed that the impetus to change the ban on maritime trade policy(海禁政策) lay in the costal society, aiming to explore the nature of the needs of coastal society in the Jiajing Reign until under the Opening of Yue-Gang. For this purpose, this study analysed the nature of ban on maritime trade(海禁). The ban on maritime trade of Yuan Dynasty unified functions and purpose to secure national profits from trade, but the Ming Dynasty did not. The Ming Dynasty accepted opinions of conservative ban on maritime trade proponents who neglected the commercial prospects of coastal societies with an emphasis on public security with regarding to the violent circumstances there. Zhuwan(朱紈) was sent to the coastal societal area to secure public security through conservative ban on maritime trade by excluding ‘connections(接濟).’ However, this method had an influence on the trade and lives of people in communities and instead induced Japanese invaders further inlanded resulting in severe damage. The people in coastal society were driven to smuggling or piracy. The purpose of ban on maritime trade as a national law was to ensure public security, but the coastal society had gained profits under it. For this, some people in costal society made illegal voyages and engaged in smuggling. However, when the public security in the coastal society was severe, the ban on maritime trade became a barrier to trade by sticking to its original purpose and function. Such a profit-oriented nature of coastal society was separate from the order of the Ming Dynasty which put an emphasis on public security. However, the coastal society had to eliminate violent groups such as Japanese invaders and pirates in order to ensure public security there. As for public security, the coastal society suggested construction of harbors centering on the sea routes of the islands. That is, it was emphasized that it could guarantee the livelihood of people in the coastal areas and it was more practical to reinforce national coastal security through tax income. As these needs were accepted by military officers of the coastal society who had to realize the will to defeat Japanese invaders occupying land during the middle of the Ming Dynasty, an advance to the sea was planned and prepared for. In conclusion, it was discovered that the trade in coastal society could be compatible with national security and the ban on maritime trade policy by the Ming Dynasty could not ensure more public stability. The opening of Yue-Gang was designed to prevent a Japanese invasion and maintain public security at sea.
Abstract
This study presumed that the impetus to change the ban on maritime trade policy(海禁政策) lay in the costal society, aiming to explore the nature of the needs of coastal society in the Jiajing Reign until under the Opening of Yue-Gang. For this purpose, this study analysed the nature of ban on maritime trade(海禁). The ban on maritime trade of Yuan Dynasty unified functions and purpose to secure national profits from trade, but the Ming Dynasty did not. The Ming Dynasty accepted opinions of conservative ban on maritime trade proponents who neglected the commercial prospects of coastal societies with an emphasis on public security with regarding to the violent circumstances there. Zhuwan(朱紈) was sent to the coastal societal area to secure public security through conservative ban on maritime trade by excluding ‘connections(接濟).’ However, this method had an influence on the trade and lives of people in communities and instead induced Japanese invaders further inlanded resulting in severe damage. The people in coastal society were driven to smuggling or piracy. The purpose of ban on maritime trade as a national law was to ensure public security, but the coastal society had gained profits under it. For this, some people in costal society made illegal voyages and engaged in smuggling. However, when the public security in the coastal society was severe, the ban on maritime trade became a barrier to trade by sticking to its original purpose and function. Such a profit-oriented nature of coastal society was separate from the order of the Ming Dynasty which put an emphasis on public security. However, the coastal society had to eliminate violent groups such as Japanese invaders and pirates in order to ensure public security there. As for public security, the coastal society suggested construction of harbors centering on the sea routes of the islands. That is, it was emphasized that it could guarantee the livelihood of people in the coastal areas and it was more practical to reinforce national coastal security through tax income. As these needs were accepted by military officers of the coastal society who had to realize the will to defeat Japanese invaders occupying land during the middle of the Ming Dynasty, an advance to the sea was planned and prepared for. In conclusion, it was discovered that the trade in coastal society could be compatible with national security and the ban on maritime trade policy by the Ming Dynasty could not ensure more public stability. The opening of Yue-Gang was designed to prevent a Japanese invasion and maintain public security at sea.
참고문헌 (65)
- "大明會典", ~
- "明實錄", ~
- 顧炎武, "四部叢刊廣編" (1979), 四部叢刊廣編
- 穀應泰, "明史紀事本末" (1988), 文淵閣四庫全書
- 萬曆, "漳州府志" (2012), 廈門大學出版社
- 萬表, "叢書集成初編" (1991), 叢書集成初編
- 博克舍, "十六世紀中國南部行記" (1990), 中華書局
- 徐宗魯, "松寇紀略" (1947), 國立中央圖書館
- 薛甲, "四庫禁燬書叢刋" (2000), 北京出版社
- 崇禎, "日本藏中國罕見地方志叢刊" (1992), 書目文獻出版社
- 嚴嵩, "續修四庫全書" (1997), 上海古籍出版社
- 王圻, "續修四庫全書" (1995), 上海古籍出版社
- 王士騏, "四庫全書存目叢書" (1996), 齊魯書社
- 王世貞, "文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 臺灣商務印書館
- 林希元, "四庫全書存目叢書" (1997), 齊魯書社
- 張燮, "海外交通史籍總刊" (2000), 中華書局
- 鄭若曾, "文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 商務印書館
- 鄭若曾, "文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 商務印書館
- 鄭若曾, "籌海圖編" (2007), 中華書局
- 朱紈, "四庫全書存目叢書" (1997), 齊魯書社
- 陣全之, "續修四庫全書" (1997), 上海古籍出版社
- 黃侯卿, "北京圖書館古籍珍本叢" (1988), 書目文獻出版社
- 원정식, "류큐왕국" (2008), 소화
- 오금성, "國法과 社會慣行" (2007), 지식산업사
- 이영, "팍스몽골리카의 동요와 고려말 왜구" (2013), 혜안
- 村井章介, "중세 왜인의 세계" (1998), 소화
- 唐力行, "中國社會史叢書" (1993), 浙江人民出版社
- 戴裔煊, "明代嘉隆間的倭寇海盜與中國資本主義的萌芽" (1982), 中國社會科學出版社
- 李光璧, "明代禦倭戰爭", 上海人民出版社 (1956)
- 吳重翰, "明代倭寇犯華史略" (1939), 商務印書館
- 李慶新, "明代海外貿易制度" (2007), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 林仁川, "明末淸初私人海上貿易" (1987), 華東師範大學出版社
- 鄭永常, "來自海洋的挑戰" (2006), 稻鄕出版社
- 晁中辰, "明代海禁與海外貿易" (2005), 人民出版社
- 陳尙勝, "‘懷夷’與‘抑商’-明代海洋力量興衰硏究" (1997), 人民出版社
- 檀上寬, "明代海禁=朝貢システムと華夷秩序" (2013), 京都女子大學出版會
- 濱下武志, "朝貢システムと近代アジア" (1997), 岩波書店
- 上田信, "中國の歷史" (2005), 講談社
- 岩井茂樹, "東アジア近現代通史 1" (2010), 岩波書店
- 岩井茂樹, "中國近世社會の秩序形成" (2004), 東京大學人文科學硏究所
- 村井章介, "中世後期における東アジアの國際関係" (1997), 山川出版社
- 岸本美緖, "“後十六世紀問題”與淸朝", 명청사연구, 20(20), pp.125~148 (2004), 명청사학회
- 윤성익, "‘後期倭寇’로서의 乙卯倭變", 한일관계사연구, (24), pp.143~176 (2006), 한일관계사학회
- 윤성익, "明代倭寇論에 대한 재고찰", 明淸史硏究, 14 (2001), 明淸史學會
- 한지선, "네덜란드 동인도회사의 기록을 통해 본 明末의 貿易構造― 1620년대 月港 무역의 변화와 澎湖事件 ―", 명청사연구, (40), pp.35~69 (2013), 명청사학회
- 한지선, "明末 浙江地域의 密貿易과 沿海社會", 湖南學硏究, 46, pp.159~181 (2012), 호남사학회[DOI]
- 홍성구, "明代 北邊의 互市와 朝貢", 중국사연구, (72), pp.67~92 (2011), 중국사학회
- 郭淵, "『籌海圖篇』與明代海防", 古代文明 (2012), 東北師範大學世界古典文明史研究所亞洲文明研究院
- 冷東, "戚繼光視野下的明代潮州社會", 廣州大學學報 (2004), 廣州大學
- 廖大珂, "朱纨事件与东亚海上贸易体系的形成", 文史哲 (2009)
- 劉婷玉, "朱紈之死與閩南士紳林希元-兼論嘉靖年間閩南區域秩序之變遷", 明代硏究, 20 (2013), 中國明代硏究學會
- 白斌, "明代朱紈海禁政策硏究", 中國海洋學會2007年學術年會論文集(下冊) (2007), 中国海洋学会
- 範金民, "明代萬曆後期通番案述論", 南京大學學報 (2002), 南京大學
- 範中義, "論嘉靖年間倭寇的性質", 明史研究, 8 (2003), 中國明史學會
- 王守稼, "明代海外貿易政策硏究-兼評海禁與弛禁之爭-", 史林 (1986), 上海社會科學院歷史研究所
- 王日根, "明海洋管理制度化進程中的朝廷與地方", 大連大學學報 (2008), 大連大學
- 李金明, "論明初的海禁與朝貢貿易", 2006, (7), 福建社會科學院
- 李金明, "明代海外朝貢貿易實質初探", 中國社會經濟史硏究 (1988), 廈門大學
- 李龍潛, "明代廣東的對外貿易", 文史哲 (1982), 山東大學
- 張彬村, "16世紀舟山群島的走私貿易", 中國海洋史論文集 (1984), 中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所
- 鄭梁生, "明嘉靖間浙江巡撫朱紈執行海禁始末", 第二屆國際華學硏究會議論文集 (1992), 中國文化大學出版部
- 木岡さやか, "明代海禁體制の再編と漳州月港の開港", 史窓, 64 (2007), 京都女子大學史學會
- 岩井茂樹, "明代中國の禮制覇權主義と東アジアの秩序", 東洋文化, 85 (2005), 東京大學東洋文化硏究所
- 田中健夫, "‘前期倭寇’‘後期倭寇’というよび方について", 日本歷史, 404 (1982), 日本歷史學會
- 片山誠二郞, "明代海上密貿易と沿海地方鄕紳層", 歷史學硏究, 164 (1953), 日本歷史學硏究會
