본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

北宋的嫁妝法律條款 -基於法律文本的考察-

북송대 결혼지참금 법률 조항 -法律文本에 근거한 고찰-

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

There was no independent legislation on Marriage Property in legal system of Song Dynasty. But the rulers of Early Song Dynasty had been promulgated to regulate about dowry in Household Division and Funeral laws of Song Xing Tong. After entering Song RenZong and Song ZheZong , The amount of dowry regulations increased more and more. The property of daughter which was called family property in Household Division. But as every individual all knew, its features and targets and functions was dowry. It could be taken as the result of the property flow. According to its content, dowry regulations could be classified as no‐son family and Had Male Offspring’family. It was different that the ways, the programs, the species, the amount and the proportion to get dowry for the daughters of no‐son family in Song Xing Tong. In the Late Mid‐Northern Song Dynasty, law revision of dowry was on the Basis of Testamentary Succession in preference. So the order and the share of succession and the prerequisite to in heritance of daughters of no‐son family had changed. Meanwhile, Category and Quantity of the heir was more than before, such as married aunts, married sisters and married nieces became the Successor of no‐son family. The order of these heiresses was priori to heir. But the share of succession of heiresses was much lower than heirs and the land of no‐son family was to be exclusion out. The Legislative System of property of no‐ non family had a fairly good operability. At the same time that could promote to control the redistribution of social wealth by the use of law. This way was not only out of the human’s emotional need to show consanguineous affection to their female offspring but also to resolve the problem of providing for the aged elders. Based on these analyses, the right of Inheritance of Ming Ji Zi became a new problem, when and why it was confirmed in legal form. The deep going research for the subject, it can offered the new observation angle for studying the development vein of legislation on Marriage Property of Song Dynasty and civil laws of Ancient China.

Abstract

There was no independent legislation on Marriage Property in legal system of Song Dynasty. But the rulers of Early Song Dynasty had been promulgated to regulate about dowry in Household Division and Funeral laws of Song Xing Tong. After entering Song RenZong and Song ZheZong , The amount of dowry regulations increased more and more. The property of daughter which was called family property in Household Division. But as every individual all knew, its features and targets and functions was dowry. It could be taken as the result of the property flow. According to its content, dowry regulations could be classified as no‐son family and Had Male Offspring’family. It was different that the ways, the programs, the species, the amount and the proportion to get dowry for the daughters of no‐son family in Song Xing Tong. In the Late Mid‐Northern Song Dynasty, law revision of dowry was on the Basis of Testamentary Succession in preference. So the order and the share of succession and the prerequisite to in heritance of daughters of no‐son family had changed. Meanwhile, Category and Quantity of the heir was more than before, such as married aunts, married sisters and married nieces became the Successor of no‐son family. The order of these heiresses was priori to heir. But the share of succession of heiresses was much lower than heirs and the land of no‐son family was to be exclusion out. The Legislative System of property of no‐ non family had a fairly good operability. At the same time that could promote to control the redistribution of social wealth by the use of law. This way was not only out of the human’s emotional need to show consanguineous affection to their female offspring but also to resolve the problem of providing for the aged elders. Based on these analyses, the right of Inheritance of Ming Ji Zi became a new problem, when and why it was confirmed in legal form. The deep going research for the subject, it can offered the new observation angle for studying the development vein of legislation on Marriage Property of Song Dynasty and civil laws of Ancient China.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. 這方面的論著非常多, "內闈,宋代的婚姻和婦女生活" (2004), 江蘇人民出版社
  2. 仁井田陞, "中國法制史研究,奴隸農奴法,家族村落法" (1962), 東京大學出版社
  3. 柳田節子, "宋代庶民の女たち" (2003), 汲古書院
  4. 滋賀秀三, "中國家族法原理" (2003), 法律出版社
  5. 白凱, "中國的婦女與財產,960—1949" (2003), 上海書店出版社
  6. 袁俐, "宋代女性財產權述論" (1988), 杭州大學歷史系宋史研究室
  7. 浙江省社聯, "探索 in: 家產繼承史論" (2000), 雲南大學出版社
  8. "宋代家庭研究" (2005), 上海人民出版社
  9. 鄧小南, "唐宋女性與社會" (2003), 上海辭書出版社
  10. 張國剛, "家庭史研究的新視野" (2004), 生活、讀書、新知三聯書店
  11. 柳立言, "宋代分產法“在室女得男之半”新探 in: 宋代的家庭與法律" (2008), 上海古籍出版社
  12. 張曉宇, "奩中物:宋代在室女“財產權”之形態與意義" (2008), 江蘇教育出版社
  13. 竇儀, "宋刑統" (1984), 中華書局
  14. "名公書判清明集", ~
  15. 脫脫, "宋史" (1977), 中華書局
  16. 仁井田陞, "唐宋法律文書研究", pp.603~604 (1937), 東方文化學院東京研究所
  17. 李燾, "續資治通鑒長編" (2004), 中華書局
  18. 鄧小南, "『唐研究』第十一輯" (2005), 北京大學出版社
  19. 參見柳立言, "宋代分產法“在室女得男之半” in: 宋代的家庭和法律", pp.484~489 (2008), 上海古籍出版社
  20. 參見段塔麗, "唐代婦女地位研究』第五章 「唐代習俗文化與婦女地位", pp.188~204 (2000), 人民出版社
  21. 王欽, "冊府元龜" (1960), 中華書局
  22. 徐松, "宋會要輯稿" (1957), 中華書局
  23. 張邦煒, "宋真宗劉皇后其人其事 in: 宋代婚姻家族史論", pp.244~249 (2003), 人民出版社
  24. 原刊于鄧廣銘, "宋史研究論文集" (1993), 河南大學出版社
  25. 邢鐵, "家產繼承史論" (2000), 雲南大學出版社
  26. 郭東旭, "宋代法制研究" (2000), 河北大學出版社
  27. 晁說之, "晁氏客語" (2003), 大象出版社
  28. 見羅願, "新安志" (2008), 黃山書社
  29. 參見王, "宋代的養老與慈幼", pp.371~340 (1972), 臺北鼎文書局
  30. 原刊於, "中央圖書館館刊特刊 in: 養兒防老,宋代的法律、家庭與社會" (2008), 上海古籍出版社
  31. 原刊於, "中國家庭及倫理研討會論文集" (1999), 漢學中心

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)