Simultaneous Misinformation Effect on Eyewitness Memory
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examined the effects of simultaneous misinformation on eyewitness memory. Two hundred forty five college students participated. In one condition (Simultaneous condition), participants viewed a video of a simulated crime simultaneously presented with accurate, misinforming, or neutral audio narrations. In the other condition (Post-event condition), participants read accurate, misinforming, or or neutral narratives after viewing the video. One week later, participants had a recognition memory test. The results showed memory about misinforming information was significantly less accurate and less confident than the accurate or neutral information categories, for both conditions. Overall memory accuracy and confidence rate were lower for the simultaneous condition than the post-event condition, although the accuracy for the misinforming information were not different between two conditions. There was no difference on memory accuracy between perpetrator related and environment related items. The results indicated the negative effect of simultaneous misinformation on eyewitness memory when there were changes of timing, modality, and attention about the misinformation from the previous post-event misinformation research.
Abstract
This study examined the effects of simultaneous misinformation on eyewitness memory. Two hundred forty five college students participated. In one condition (Simultaneous condition), participants viewed a video of a simulated crime simultaneously presented with accurate, misinforming, or neutral audio narrations. In the other condition (Post-event condition), participants read accurate, misinforming, or or neutral narratives after viewing the video. One week later, participants had a recognition memory test. The results showed memory about misinforming information was significantly less accurate and less confident than the accurate or neutral information categories, for both conditions. Overall memory accuracy and confidence rate were lower for the simultaneous condition than the post-event condition, although the accuracy for the misinforming information were not different between two conditions. There was no difference on memory accuracy between perpetrator related and environment related items. The results indicated the negative effect of simultaneous misinformation on eyewitness memory when there were changes of timing, modality, and attention about the misinformation from the previous post-event misinformation research.
참고문헌 (8)
- Ceci, S. J., "Unwarranted assumptions about children’s testimonial", The Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, pp.311~318 (2007)
- Costanzo, M., "Forensic and legal psychology" (2012), Worth Publishers
- Eakin, D. K., "Misinformation effects in eyewitness memory: The presence and absence of memory impairment as a function of warning and misinformation accessibility", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, pp.813~825 (2003)
- Horgan, T. G., "Gender differences in memory for the appearances of others", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(2), pp.185~196 (2004)
- McCloskey, M., "Postevent information and memory: Reply to Loftus, Schooler, and Wagenaar", Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 114, pp.381~387 (1985)
- Laney, C., "Asparagus, a love story", Experimental Psychology, 55(5), pp.291~300 (2008)[DOI]
- Loftus, E. F., "Make-believe memories", American Psychologist, 58(11), pp.867~873 (2003)
- Loftus, E. F., "Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory", Learning & Memory, 12, pp.361~366 (2005)
