엘리엇의 『앤토니와 클레오파트라』에 대한 이해와 평가
Eliot and Shakespeare: Anthony and Cleopatra as a Defense for Eliot's Critical Theory
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In his essay “Hamlet and His Problems”(1919), Eliot analyses Shakespeare’s Hamlet, and evaluates Macbeth, Coriolanus, and Antony and Cleopatra favorably. To Eliot, Hamlet is not as good as Macbeth, because it has no objective correlatives. Macbeth is the work, in which he can find suitable correlatives. Unlike Hamlet, Coriolanus and Antony and Cleopatra seem to him to be an artistic success. This article investigates Eliot’s evaluation of Antony and Cleopatra based on his objective correlative theory. Eliot claims that an author’s emotions should not be in his works, and that instead he should present them objectively. Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra is the best example of this theory, by way of Shakespeare’s various literary conventions, such as paradox, overtone, image, symbol, etc.
Abstract
In his essay “Hamlet and His Problems”(1919), Eliot analyses Shakespeare’s Hamlet, and evaluates Macbeth, Coriolanus, and Antony and Cleopatra favorably. To Eliot, Hamlet is not as good as Macbeth, because it has no objective correlatives. Macbeth is the work, in which he can find suitable correlatives. Unlike Hamlet, Coriolanus and Antony and Cleopatra seem to him to be an artistic success. This article investigates Eliot’s evaluation of Antony and Cleopatra based on his objective correlative theory. Eliot claims that an author’s emotions should not be in his works, and that instead he should present them objectively. Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra is the best example of this theory, by way of Shakespeare’s various literary conventions, such as paradox, overtone, image, symbol, etc.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김광호, "T. S. Eliot의 Shakespeare비평", Shakespeare Review, pp.59~84 (1975), 한국셰익스피어학회
- 박우수, "셰익스피어 로마극의 재평가: 『안토니와 클레오파트라』를 중심으로", Shakespeare Review, 40(4), pp.841~868 (2004), 한국셰익스피어학회
- 신정옥, "앤토니와 클레오파트라 (셰익스피어전집14)" (2006), 전예원
- 양병현, "『황무지』의 하이퍼텍스트성: 은유의 논리", T. S. 엘리엇연구, 19(2), pp.111~136 (2009), 한국T.S.엘리엇학회
- 여형구, "셰익스피어 비평가로서 엘리엇의 자리매김", pp.31~67 (2000), 한국드라마학회
- 이인직, "역설과 과장: 『앤토니와 클레오파트라』의 시적 표현법 연구", 신영어영문학, (35), pp.161~176 (2006), 신영어영문학회
- 이철희, "엘리엇의 객관적 상관물과 셰익스피어의 「맥베스」", T. S. 엘리엇연구, 21(1), pp.113~136 (2011), 한국T.S.엘리엇학회
- 최영도, "『앤토니와 클레오파트라』에 나타난 역설적 기교와 극적 구조의 특성", 목원대저널, pp.129~161 (1991)
- Callow, James T., "Guide to American Literature: from Emily Dickinson to the Present" (1977), Harper &Row, Publishers
- Eliot, T. S., "T. S. Eliot: Selected Essays 1917-1932" (1917), Harcourt, Brace and Company
- Eliot, T. S., "The Complete Poems and Plays of T. S. Eliot" (1969), Faber & Faber
- Eliot, T. S., "On Poetry and Poets" (1957), Faber &Faber
- Eliot, T. S., "The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism" (1972), Methuen & Co. Ltd.
- Eliot, T. S., "Selected Prose of T. S. Eliot" (1975), Farrar, Straus and Giroux
- Garcia, J. M. R., "Discovering the classic: Shakespeare, T .S. Eliot, and William Carlos Williams", Comparatist, 27, pp.21~40 (2003)
- Harding, Jason, "T. S. Eliot’s Shakespeare", Essays in Criticism, 62(2), pp.160~177 (2012)
- Kott, Jan, "Shakespeare: Our Contemporary" (1991), Routledge
- Marathe, Sudhakar, "T. S. Eliot’s Shakespeare Criticism: A Perfect Form of Development" (1989), B. R. Publishing Corporation
- Matthiessen, F. O., "The Achievement of T. S. Eliot: An Essay on Nature of Poetry" (1976), Oxford UP
- Milward, P., "The Metaphysics of T. S. Eliot-In View of Shakespeare", Heythrop Journal, 51(1), pp.80~84 (2010)
- Orgel, Stephen, "Shakespeare: The Critical Complex" (1999), Garland Publishing, Inc
- Porter, J. A., "Revisiting Shakespeare’s Eliot", Renaissance Papers, pp.17~27 (2004)
- Stephen, Martin, "Studying Shakespeare" (1984), Longman York Press