텍사스 산업클러스터의 지역적 특징과 주정부의 발전 전략
Regional Characteristics of Industrial Clusters in Texas and the State Government’s Development Strategy
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
최근 테슬라나 삼성전자 등 글로벌 기업들이 미국 텍사스 주로 본사를 이전하거나, 기존 생산시설의 확장 또는 신규 지역거점본부를 설립하는 현상이 두드러지게 나타나고 있다. 이른바 ‘텍시트(Texit)’로까지 명명되는 텍사스를 향한 기업들의 투자 행렬은 2000년대부터 가속화되어 오고 있는 현상이며, 지리적으로 댈러스-포트워스, 휴스턴, 오스틴, 샌안토니오를 중심으로 하는 대도시권 산업클러스터에 집중되어 있다. 이를 배경으로본 논문은 텍사스 대도시권 산업클러스터의 부문별 현황과 지리적 특징을 고찰하고, 강력한 제도적 행위자로서텍사스 주정부가 어떠한 산업클러스터 발전 정책을 추진해 왔는지를 살펴본다. 연구 결과, 텍사스의 시장자유주의 정책, 다각화된 인센티브 프로그램, 대도시권별 특성화 등이 주정부 발전 전략의 핵심을 이루고 있는 것으로 파악되었다. 텍사스는 실리콘밸리와 같이 보헤미안적 자유주의에 바탕을 둔 국지화된 기업가주의와 그에따른 창업이 활발하지는 않지만, 강력한 주정부의 리더십 하에서 낮은 세율과 규제완화, 저렴한 토지와 인프라, 우수한 교육제도와 인적자본 등에서 경쟁우위를 형성하여 이를 외부 투자유치에 적극적으로 활용하고 있다.
Abstract
Texas has recently emerged as a phenomenal industrial destination, which attracts headquarters, production facilities, and/or regional centers of global corporations including Tesla and Samsung. Known as “Texit”, this trend of corporate investment to Texas has concentrated in highly developed industrial clusters (such as Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, Austin, and San Antonio) since the early 2000s. Against this background, this paper examines sectoral and geographical characteristics of those clusters, and investigates associated state initiatives that have been introduced and implemented. As a result, key policy measures in the state are found to be aligned to free-market liberalism, diversified incentives, and regional specialization. Unlike Silicon Valley where Bohemian liberalism engendered vibrant entrepreneurship and innovative start-up formation, it is the strong state government that leads industrial cluster upgrading in Texas, while successfully harnessing lower income taxes and deregulation, affordable land and infrastructure, and quality higher education and human capital as regional assets for attracting inward investment.
참고문헌 (84)
- 권오혁, "산업클러스터의 개념과 범위", 대한지리학회지, 52(1), pp.55~71 (2017), 대한지리학회
- 미국 주정부의 외국인 투자유치 행정: 6개주정부의 외국인 투자유치를 중심으로, "김혜남", 한국지방자치국제화재단 뉴욕사무소, ~ (2007)
- 남기범, "클러스터 정책실패의 교훈", 한국경제지리학회지, 7(3), pp.407~432 (2004), 한국경제지리학회
- 남기범, "‘선택과 집중’의 종언: 포스트클러스터 지역산업정책의 논거와 방향", 한국경제지리학회지, 19(4), pp.764~781 (2016), 한국경제지리학회[DOI]
- 미국 텍사스가세계 우주산업의 중심이 될 수 있었던 이유, , 2021
- ‘기업들의 천국’ 美텍사스주, 법인·소득세 0%, , 2019
- 매일경제, "사람과 기업 몰려오게 만든 미국 텍사스주가 부럽다", ~ (2021)
- 박경환, "글로벌, 로컬, 스케일― 공간과 장소를 둘러싼 정치", 로컬리티 인문학, (5), pp.47~85 (2011), 한국민족문화연구소
- 박경환, "Review on Andrew Herod’s Scale", Localities, 3, pp.233~244 (2013)
- 박경환, "샌디에이고 대도시권의 산업 클러스터와 도시 거버넌스", 한국도시지리학회지, 18(2), pp.33~53 (2015), 한국도시지리학회
- Massey, D., "공간을 위하여" (2016), 심산
- 유재윤, "풍요와 번영의 도시: 댈러스", 국토연구, 225, pp.82~87 (2000)
- 유회명, "텍사스의 ‘서부화 전략’과 미국 보수주의의 부활", 미국사연구, 53, pp.221~247 (2021), 한국미국사학회[DOI]
- 이데일리, "美 IT기업 잇단 脫실리콘밸리…테슬라도 텍사스로 본사 이전", ~ (2021)
- 이수민, "반도체산업 첨단 클러스터 구축과 정부의역할 : 미국 오스틴 실리콘 힐과 독일 드레스덴실리콘 색소니의 사례 비교 연구", 박사, pp.2017
- 이재열, "글로벌 생산네트워크 담론의 진화: 기업 및 산업 중심 거버넌스 분석을 넘어서", 대한지리학회지, 51(5), pp.667~690 (2016), 대한지리학회
- 이재열, "Constructing Regional Advantage for the Stem Cell Biotechnology Sector in Madison, Wisconsin, USA", 한국지리학회지, 5(3), pp.357~373 (2016), 한국지리학회
- 이재열, "The Cultural Circuit of Capital and the Evolution of Regional Development Policy in Korea: A New Form of Managerialist Governance in Action?", 한국경제지리학회지, 25(2), pp.237~253 (2022), 한국경제지리학회[DOI]
- 이재열, "초국적기업의 사회적 착근성에 관한 소고: 사업체계론을 중심으로", 한국지리학회지, 7(1), pp.85~96 (2018), 한국지리학회[DOI]
- Storper, M., "도시의 열쇠" (2021), 국토연구원
- Aoyama, Y, "핵심 개념으로 배우는 경제지리학" (2018), 푸른길
- 전경숙, "텍사스 주 러벅시의 지역성, 성장 자원과지속가능한 도시 만들기", 한국도시지리학회지, 16(3), pp.13~26 (2013)
- 전혜미, "美 캘리포니아가 배우고 싶은 텍사스의노하우는?", KOTRA 해외시장뉴스, ~ (2011)
- 주간동아, "‘법인세·개인소득세 제로’ 텍사스, 테크기업 몰린다", ~ (2021)
- 중앙일보, "억만장자 일론 머스크가 LA에서 텍사스로 이사한 이유", ~ (2021)
- 한국경제, "美 텍사스가 기업 성지로 뜨는 이유", ~ (2021)
- Agnew, D., "Texas Legislature : A Texas economic incentive offers massive tax breaks to companies, but its renewal isn’t a done deal", Texas Tribune, ~ (2021)
- Amin, A., "Globalisation, Institutions and Regional Development in Europe", pp.1~24 (1994), Oxford University Press
- Asheim, B., "The Oxford Handbook of Innovation", pp.291~317 (2005), Oxford University Press
- Bathelt, H., "Clusters and knowledge : local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation", Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), pp.31~56 (2004)
- "Elon Musk’s California Exit Can Save Him $2 Billion in Taxes" (2021)[URL]
- "Tesla’s Texas Move Is Latest Sign of California Losing Tech Grip" (2021)[URL]
- Boschma, R. A., "Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Toward an evolutionary economic geography", Journal of Economic Geography, 6(3), pp.273~302 (2006)
- "Texas tops 2022 best & worst states for business survey of CEOs, chief executive" (2022)[URL]
- Coe N., "Globalizing regional development : a global production networks perspective", Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29, pp.468~484 (2004)
- Coe, N., "Global production networks : Realizing the potential", Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3), pp.271~295 (2008)[DOI]
- Reshoring: Myth or Reality?, OECD Science, "De Backer, K.", OECD Publishing, ~, pp.Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 27 (2016)
- Preliminary Assessment of the Factors That Led Austin to Become a High-Tech Entrepreneurial City, "Echeverri-Carroll, E.", Kauffman Foundation, University of Texas at Austin, ~ (2016)
- Erber, G., "The New Economy in a Growth Crisis" (2005), Routledge
- Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, "Industry clusters shape Texas economy", Southwest Economy, pp.3~7 (2007)
- At the Heart of Texas : Cities’ Industry Clusters Drive Growth, "Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas", ~ (2018)
- Florida, R., "Bohemia and economic geography", Journal of Economic Geography, 2, pp.55~71 (2002)
- Florida, R., "The economic geography of talent", Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4), pp.743~755 (2002)
- Granovetter, M., "Economic action and social structure : the problem of embeddedness", American Journal of Sociology, 91, pp.481~510 (1985)
- Granovetter, M., "The impact of social structure on economic outcomes", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), pp.33~50 (2005)
- "Abbott grants $10 million to spaceports in Houston and South Texas" (2022)[URL]
- "Texit: Why high-tech giants are fleeing Silicon Valley for Texas" (2021)[URL]
- Konnect, "어스틴 2040(1부): 뜨는 도시 어스틴 “발전 가능성은?", ~ (2021)
- Kroenig, M., "The Return of Great Power Rivalry:Democracy versus Autocracy from the Ancient World to the U.S., and China" (2020), Oxford University Press
- Lopez, E., "Uncovering Texas Politics in the 21st Century" (2020), The University of Texas at Tyler Press
- "Silicon Valley’s tech monopoly is over. Is the future in Austin, Texas?" (2022)[URL]
- McNichol, E., "The Texas Economic Model: Hard for Other States to Follow and Not All It Seems" (2012), Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
- Munir, K. A., "Being different : how normative and cognitive aspects of institutional environments influence technology transfer", Human Relations, 55(12), pp.1403~1428 (2002)
- OECD, "Understanding Countries’ Net-Zero Emissions Targets, Environment Directorate International Energy Agency", OECD, ~ (2021)
- Perryman, M., "The Texas economy: past performance and future expectations", Today’s CPA, 3&4, pp.22~25 (2016)
- Porter, M., "The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography", pp.15~34 (2000), Oxford:Oxford University Press
- Porter, M., "The economics performance of regions", Regional Studies, 37, pp.549~578 (2003)
- Reuter, D., "Elon Musk has a $2.5 billion reason to move to Texas: avoiding California capital gains tax", Business Insider, ~ (2021)
- Annual Report(2017): Building, Changing, Growing, "San Antonio Economic Development Foundation", ~ (2018)
- Saxenian, A., "The origin and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley", Research Policy, 20, pp.423~437 (1991)
- Saxenian, A., "Silicon Valley’s New Immigrant Entrepreneurs" (1999), University of California Press
- Segal, E., "Supply chain crisis worsens as Russia’s war against Ukraine continues", Forbes, ~ (2022)
- Storper, M., "The resurgence of regional economies, ten year later : the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies", European Urban and Regional Studies, 2, pp.191~222 (1995)
- Storper, M., "The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy" (1997), Guilford Press
- Tellis, A., "Strategic Asia 2020: US-China Competition for Global Influence", pp.3~43 (2019), The National Bureau of Asian Research
- "Economic Stabilization Fund, State Government of Texas" (2021)[URL]
- "Texas Industry Clusters, Office of the Governor" (2020)[URL]
- "Texas Industry Concentrations: Where the State’s Key Sectors Cluster" (2020)[URL]
- Texas Economic Development & Tourism, "Gone to Texas: Texas Economic Development Guide 2021~2022, Volume 12", Conway Data, ~ (2021)
- Texas Enterprise Fund: 2021 Legislative Report, "Texas Economic Development & Tourism", Office of the Governor, ~ (2021)
- "Texas Business Incentives & Programs: Overview" (2021)[URL]
- Texas Economic Development & Tourism, "A Decade of Domination: Texas Economic Development Guide 2022~2023, Volume 13", Conway Data, ~ (2022)
- "Texas Enterprise Zone Program Overview, revised on February 14" (2022)[URL]
- "Governor’s University Research Initiative 2021 Legislative Report: 87th Session" (2021)[URL]
- "Texas adds tier 1, tier 2 universities in 2021" (2022)[URL]
- "Texas Municipal League Economic Development Handbook" (2020)[URL]
- "Population Transition in Metropolitan Area"[URL]
- "How Californians are diversifying Texas and could change its political landscape" (2022)[URL]
- "kills Development Fund" (2022)[URL]
- Major metros, border cities, "Torres, L.", ~, pp.Texas Economy, Publication 2057 (2014)
- The Economic Stabilization Fund Origins and Historical Use, "TTARA", TTARA, 1~6 (2017)
- "Bea data by topics" (2021)[URL]
- "Union affiliation of employed wage and salary workers by state" (2022)[URL]
- "Population statistics by state" (2021)[URL]
