Milestone for Null Pronominalization in the Ciman-Construction: A Reply to An (2013)
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The marker nun attached to the relevant nominal in the subsequent clause of the ciman construction is not a plain topic one, but rather a contrastive topic one (Lee 2013a). This induces its contrastive counterpart to be retrieved out of the preceding clause. If the counterpart is identified and may be syntactically independent of its following nominal, the next step is that the nun-marked remnant allows null pronominalization. Beyond the multiple case marking construction (i.e., MCM) context, this may even be extended to the non-MCM context. The nominative- or accusative-marked genuine possessor or the adjunct, which can be replaced by the genitive-marked element, acts separately from its immediately following nominal in the sentence-level context, which induces the nun-marked remnant in the second clause to allow null pronominalization. This is also what the nun-marked goal in the subsequent clause of the ciman construction allowing the double accusative construction shows. As a result, the null pronominalization of the Minor Argument (i.e., null pronominalization of sonkalak-ul 'finger-ACC' in Tom-uy sonkalak-ul 'Tom-GEN finger-ACC' which is Minor Argument Pronominalization (i.e., MAP) in An's (2012a) term) in the MCM context and the other null pronominalization in the non-MCM context are both the same null argument phenomenon even though the former is involved in the nun-marked remnant's ownership of the Minor Argument.
Abstract
The marker nun attached to the relevant nominal in the subsequent clause of the ciman construction is not a plain topic one, but rather a contrastive topic one (Lee 2013a). This induces its contrastive counterpart to be retrieved out of the preceding clause. If the counterpart is identified and may be syntactically independent of its following nominal, the next step is that the nun-marked remnant allows null pronominalization. Beyond the multiple case marking construction (i.e., MCM) context, this may even be extended to the non-MCM context. The nominative- or accusative-marked genuine possessor or the adjunct, which can be replaced by the genitive-marked element, acts separately from its immediately following nominal in the sentence-level context, which induces the nun-marked remnant in the second clause to allow null pronominalization. This is also what the nun-marked goal in the subsequent clause of the ciman construction allowing the double accusative construction shows. As a result, the null pronominalization of the Minor Argument (i.e., null pronominalization of sonkalak-ul 'finger-ACC' in Tom-uy sonkalak-ul 'Tom-GEN finger-ACC' which is Minor Argument Pronominalization (i.e., MAP) in An's (2012a) term) in the MCM context and the other null pronominalization in the non-MCM context are both the same null argument phenomenon even though the former is involved in the nun-marked remnant's ownership of the Minor Argument.
참고문헌 (15)
- Ahn, H. -D, "On null argument and clausal ellipsis in Korean", Language and Linguistics, 57, pp.95~124 (2012)
- 안희돈, "Notes on Apparent Xo Replacement of Pro", 언어, 38(2), pp.397~412 (2013), 한국언어학회
- 안덕호, "NP-Ellipsis, Its Impostors, and Minor Argument Pronominalization in Korean", 언어, 37(2), pp.345~356 (2012), 한국언어학회
- 안덕호, "최소주의적 관점에서의 소유격: 한국어를 중심으로", 언어, 37(3), pp.607~621 (2012), 한국언어학회
- 안덕호, "An Elaboration of An’s (2012b) Analysis of MAP and NPE: A Reply to Lee (2012)", 언어, 38(1), pp.173~196 (2013), 한국언어학회
- Cho, S, "Three Forms of Case Agreement in Korean", 박사, pp.2000
- Jung, Y. -J, "Decomposing Ditransitive Verbs", Proceedings of SICGG, pp.101~120 (2004)
- Doo-Won Lee, "The Korean Counterparts of the English Ditransitive Verb Teach", 영미어문학, 83(83), pp.197~212 (2007), 한국영미어문학회
- 이두원, "Multiple Case Marking and Null Argument Phenomena", 언어, 37(3), pp.659~678 (2012), 한국언어학회
- 이두원, "Contrastive Marker Nun and Minor Argument Pronominalization in the Ciman Construction", 생성문법연구, 23(3), pp.559~584 (2013), 한국생성문법학회
- 이두원, "Nun-Marked Remnant Allowing pro and Beyond in the Ciman Construction", 언어학 연구, 29(29), pp.229~252 (2013), 한국중원언어학회
- Ura, H, "Multiple Feature Checking: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing", 박사, pp.1996
- Yoon, J. H, "Non-nominative (major) subjects and case stacking in Korean, In Non-nominative Subjects, Volume 2", pp.265~314 (2004), John Benjamins
- Yoon, J. H, "Raising or major arguments in Korean and Japanese", Natural Language and Linguistics Theory, 25, pp.615~633 (2007)
- Yoon, J. H, "The distribution of subject properties in multiple subject constructions", Japanese, 2009, pp.16, 64~83