Contrastive Marker Nun and Minor Argument Pronominalization in the Ciman Construction
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The so-called ciman construction requires the obligatory introduction of the contrastive (topic) marker nun to the relevant element in the subsequent clause when its Minor Argument (i.e., sonkalak ‘finger’ in Tom-uy sonkalak ‘Tom-GEN finger’) undergoes null pronominalization (i.e.,pro). The contrastive marker nun attached to the relevant nominal in the subsequent clause induces its contrastive counterpart to be retrieved from the preceding clause. If it is identified, the next step is that the contrastive nun-marked remnant allows null pronominalization of the Minor Argument (i.e., Minor Argument Pronominalization (MAP) in An's (2012a) term). Though the preceding genitive phrase allows a multiple case marking construction (i.e., MCM), the nun-marked remnant in the subsequent clause doesn't always allow MAP. It permits MAP only when it has ownership of the Minor Argument. This is in accordance with the observation that the nun-marked goal in the subsequent clause of the ciman construction allows MAP only when its counterpart is marked by the accusative case in the sense that the accusative-marked goal, for example, Chelswu-lul ‘Chelswu-ACC’, is also a prospective possessor of the referent of the direct object (i.e., Minor Argument here).
Abstract
The so-called ciman construction requires the obligatory introduction of the contrastive (topic) marker nun to the relevant element in the subsequent clause when its Minor Argument (i.e., sonkalak ‘finger’ in Tom-uy sonkalak ‘Tom-GEN finger’) undergoes null pronominalization (i.e.,pro). The contrastive marker nun attached to the relevant nominal in the subsequent clause induces its contrastive counterpart to be retrieved from the preceding clause. If it is identified, the next step is that the contrastive nun-marked remnant allows null pronominalization of the Minor Argument (i.e., Minor Argument Pronominalization (MAP) in An's (2012a) term). Though the preceding genitive phrase allows a multiple case marking construction (i.e., MCM), the nun-marked remnant in the subsequent clause doesn't always allow MAP. It permits MAP only when it has ownership of the Minor Argument. This is in accordance with the observation that the nun-marked goal in the subsequent clause of the ciman construction allows MAP only when its counterpart is marked by the accusative case in the sense that the accusative-marked goal, for example, Chelswu-lul ‘Chelswu-ACC’, is also a prospective possessor of the referent of the direct object (i.e., Minor Argument here).
참고문헌 (21)
- Ahn, Hee-Don, "On null argument and clausal ellipsis in Korean", Language and Linguistics, 57, pp.95~124 (2012)
- 안희돈, "Notes on Apparent Xo Replacement of Pro", 언어, 38(2), pp.397~412 (2013), 한국언어학회
- 안덕호, "NP-Ellipsis, Its Impostors, and Minor Argument Pronominalization in Korean", 언어, 37(2), pp.345~356 (2012), 한국언어학회
- 안덕호, "최소주의적 관점에서의 소유격: 한국어를 중심으로", 언어, 37(3), pp.607~621 (2012), 한국언어학회
- Fromkin, Victoria, "An Introduction to Language" (2011), Cengage Learning
- Gropen, Jess, "The Learnability and Acquisition of the Dative Alternation in English", Language, 65(2), pp.203~257 (1989)
- Harley, Heidi, "Possession and the Double Object Construction. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2", pp.29~68 (2002), John Benjamins
- Jung, Yeun-Jin, "Decomposing Ditransitive Verbs", Proceedings of SICGG, (Summer), pp.101~120 (2004)
- Kluender, Robert, "Subjacency as a Processing Phenomenon", Language and Cognitive Process, 8, pp.573~633 (1993)
- 이두원, "Two Types of Object and Object Shift", 생성문법연구, 13(4), pp.565~ (2003), 한국생성문법학회
- 이두원, "Phases and Successive Cyclic Movement", 현대문법연구, 39(39), pp.53~70 (2005), 현대문법학회
- Doo-Won Lee, "The Korean Counterparts of the English Ditransitive Verb Teach", 영미어문학, 83(83), pp.197~212 (2007), 한국영미어문학회
- 이두원, "Multiple Case Marking and Null Argument Phenomena", 언어, 37(3), pp.659~678 (2012), 한국언어학회
- Lee, Doo-Won, "Milestone for Null Pronominalization in the Ciman Construction: A Reply to An (2013)", 석사, pp.2013
- Lee, Doo-Won, "Nun-Marked Remnant Allowing Pro and Beyond in the Ciman Construction", 석사, pp.2013
- Oehrle, Richard, "The Grammatical Status of the English Dative Alternation", 박사, pp.1976
- Thomas, Linda, "Beginning Syntax" (2001), Blackwell
- Yang. Dong-Whee, "Focus Movement, INT Effects, and Reconstruction", 석사, pp.2004
- Yoon, James H., "Non-nominative (major) subjects and case stacking in Korean, In Non-nominative Subjects, Volume 2", pp.265~314 (2004), John Benjamins
- Yoon, James H., "Raising or major arguments in Korean and Japanese", Natural Language and Linguistics Theory, 25, pp.615~633 (2007)
- Yoon, James H., "The distribution of subject properties in multiple subject constructions", Japanese, 2009, pp.16, 64~83