본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

An Investigation of Case Connectivity in Korean Sluicing and Why-stripping

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study explores the Case connectivity of Korean fragments such as matrix sluicing and why-stripping, which are elliptical variants of full wh-questions. Both fragments are limited by a certain identity condition in ellipsis. We first show that the argument structure of a missing predicate must be identical to that of the corresponding antecedent predicate. We then show that if the remnant of ellipsis is an NP, it must be Case-licensed by a missing head identical to the corresponding antecedent head. Given this, we argue that Case mismatches are possible in Korean sluicing or why-stripping when the antecedent verb may assign more than one Case. The non-structuralist approach (Sag and Nykiel 2011; Jacobson 2016) enforces the Case identity between a sub-sentential remnant and its correlate. Hence, we defend the structuralist approach to the Case connectivity of Korean fragments.

Abstract

This study explores the Case connectivity of Korean fragments such as matrix sluicing and why-stripping, which are elliptical variants of full wh-questions. Both fragments are limited by a certain identity condition in ellipsis. We first show that the argument structure of a missing predicate must be identical to that of the corresponding antecedent predicate. We then show that if the remnant of ellipsis is an NP, it must be Case-licensed by a missing head identical to the corresponding antecedent head. Given this, we argue that Case mismatches are possible in Korean sluicing or why-stripping when the antecedent verb may assign more than one Case. The non-structuralist approach (Sag and Nykiel 2011; Jacobson 2016) enforces the Case identity between a sub-sentential remnant and its correlate. Hence, we defend the structuralist approach to the Case connectivity of Korean fragments.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. AnderBois, Scott, "Issues and alternatives", PhD, pp.2011
  2. Arregui, Ana, "Processing elided verb phrases with flawed antecedents: The recycling hypothesis", Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), pp.232~246 (2006)
  3. 배수영, "Why-Stripping in Korean: A Division of Labor between Syntax and Processing", 언어, 46(1), pp.29~50 (2021), 한국언어학회[DOI]
  4. Barker, Chris, "Scopability and sluicing", Linguistics and Philosophy, 36, pp.187~223 (2013)
  5. Barros, Matthew, "Sluicing and identity in ellipsis", PhD, pp.2014
  6. 조세연, "“왜-XP?” 구문의 특성: 직접 해석 접근법을 중심으로", 인문과학연구, (55), pp.97~120 (2017), 인문과학연구소
  7. Chung, Sandra, "Sluicing and the lexicon: The point of no return", Proceedings of Berkeley Linguistics Society, 31, pp.73~91 (2006)
  8. Chung, Sandra, "Syntactic identity in sluicing: How much and why", Linguistic Inquiry, 44(1), pp.1~44 (2013)
  9. Chung, Sandra, "Sluicing and logical form", Natural language semantics, 3, pp.239~282 (1995)
  10. Chung, Sandra, "Representing language: Essays in honor of Judith Aissen", pp.31~50 (2011), Linguistics Research Center
  11. Culicover, Peter W., "Simpler syntax" (2005), Oxford University Press
  12. Culicover, Peter W., "Same-except : A domain-general cognitive relation and how language expresses it", Language, 88, pp.305~340 (2012)
  13. Dalrymple, Mary, "Ellipsis and higher-order unification", Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, pp.399~452 (1991)
  14. Fiengo, Robert, "Indices and Identity" (1994), MIT Press
  15. Ginzburg, Jonathan, "Interrogative investigations: The form, meaning and use of English interrogatives" (2000), CSLI Publications
  16. Griffiths, James, "Contrast and island sensitivity in clausal ellipsis", Syntax, 17(3), pp.661~738 (2012)
  17. Hardt, Daniel, "Verb phrase ellipsis : Form, meaning, and processing", PhD, pp.1993
  18. Hartman, Jeremy, "When E-GIVENness over-predicts identity", Paper presented at the Fourth Brussels Conference on Generative Linguistics (BCGL 4) Ellipsis Workshop (2009), Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel
  19. Hong, Sungshim, "A note on 'raising to object' in small clauses and full clauses", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 19(3), pp.275~289 (2010)
  20. Hiraiwa, Ken, "Syntactic metamorphosis : Clefts, sluicing, and in-situ focus in Japanese", Syntax, 15, pp.142~180 (2012)
  21. Jacobson, Pauline, "The fragment answer: Implications for direct compositionality (and vice versa)", Language, 92(2), pp.331~375 (2016)
  22. Kim, Jeong-Seok, "Syntactic focus movement and ellipsis : A minimalist approach", PhD, pp.1997
  23. 김정석, "생략과 초점: 수용성판단을 중심으로" (2019), 한국문화사
  24. 김정석, "An experimental investigation of why-stripping in Korean", 언어연구, 38(2), pp.271~299 (2021), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  25. Kim, Jong-Bok, "Syntactic and semantic identity in Korean sluicing : A direct interpretation approach", Lingua, 166, pp.260~293 (2015)
  26. 김종복, "Why-Stripping in English and Korean: A Direct Interpretation Approach", 생성문법연구, 27(4), pp.733~751 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  27. Merchant, Jason, "The syntax of silence : Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University Press
  28. Merchant, Jason, "Fragments and ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, pp.661~738 (2004)
  29. Merchant, Jason, "Revisiting syntactic identity conditions", Handout from Workshop on Ellipsis (2005), University of California at Berkeley
  30. Merchant, Jason, "Voice and ellipsis", Linguistic Inquiry, 44(1), pp.77~108 (2013)
  31. Nakao, Chizuru, "On the structure of Japanese ‘why’-stripping", Proceedings of GLOW in Asia IX, pp.199~212 (2013)
  32. Ortega-Santos, Iván, "On ellipsis structures involving a wh remnant and a non-wh-remnant simultaneously", Lingua, 138, pp.55~85 (2014)
  33. 박범식, "Island Sensitivity in Ellipsis and Its Implications for Movement", 생성문법연구, 19(4), pp.599~620 (2009), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  34. 박명관, "Copula and ‘Sluicing' Constructions in Korean, Chinese, and Japanese", 언어, 39(3), pp.427~452 (2014), 한국언어학회[DOI]
  35. Riemsdijk, Henk van, "A case study in syntactic markedness: The binding nature of prepositional phrases" (1978), Foris
  36. Roberts, Craige, "Information structure in discourse : Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics", Semantics and Pragmatics, 5, pp.1~69 (2012)
  37. Rooth, Mats, "Ellipsis redundancy and reduction redundancy", Proceedings of Stuttgarter ellipsis workshop, SFB 340 and IBM (1992)
  38. Ross, John Robert, "Guess who?", Papers from the 5th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.252~286 (1969), Chicago Linguistic Society
  39. Sag, Ivan, "Remarks on sluicing", Proceedings of HPSG 11 Conference (2011), CSLI Publications
  40. Schwarzschild, Roger, "GIVENness, AvoidF, and other constraints on the placement of accent", Natural Language Semantics, 7, pp.141~177 (1999)
  41. Vicente, Luis, "Morphological case mismatches under sluicing", Snippets, 29, pp.16~17 (2015)
  42. Weir, Andrew, "Fragments and clausal ellipsis", PhD, pp.2014
  43. Wood, Jim, "Case mismatching in Icelandic clausal ellipsis", Journal of Linguistics, 56, pp.399~439 (2020)
  44. Yoshida, Masaya, "The syntax of why-stripping", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33, pp.323~370 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)