본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

Formality and Syntactic Dependency in the L2 Acquisition of Preposition Stranding and Pied-piping by Korean College EFL Learners

2

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Yoon, Junghyoe, Shin, Eun Young, & Chung, Taegoo. 2015. Formality and Syntactic Dependency in the L2 Acquisition of Preposition Stranding and Pied-piping by Korean College EFL Learners. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 40-3, 451-474. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the acquisition of preposition stranding (PS) and preposition pied-piping (PP) in relative clauses by Korean learners of English. These alternating constructions have been reported to be restricted by the level of formality and the syntactic dependency of a prepositional phrase on the predicate verb (Hoffman 2005; Ko 2009). The current study investigates whether the Korean EFL learners can recognize formality and dependency and appropriately use the alternating patterns compared to native English speakers. The findings of the present study showed that the learners' grammatical and pragmatic knowledge was not complete in that they failed to associate syntactic dependency with obligatory stranding or pied-piping constructions and their pragmatic sensitivity to formality was not always mapped onto a proper structure. (Korea University)

Abstract

Yoon, Junghyoe, Shin, Eun Young, & Chung, Taegoo. 2015. Formality and Syntactic Dependency in the L2 Acquisition of Preposition Stranding and Pied-piping by Korean College EFL Learners. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 40-3, 451-474. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the acquisition of preposition stranding (PS) and preposition pied-piping (PP) in relative clauses by Korean learners of English. These alternating constructions have been reported to be restricted by the level of formality and the syntactic dependency of a prepositional phrase on the predicate verb (Hoffman 2005; Ko 2009). The current study investigates whether the Korean EFL learners can recognize formality and dependency and appropriately use the alternating patterns compared to native English speakers. The findings of the present study showed that the learners' grammatical and pragmatic knowledge was not complete in that they failed to associate syntactic dependency with obligatory stranding or pied-piping constructions and their pragmatic sensitivity to formality was not always mapped onto a proper structure. (Korea University)

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Allan, D., "The Oxford Placement Test" (2001), Oxford University Press
  2. Bardovi-Harlig, K, "Markedness and Salience in Second Language Acquisition", Language Learning, 37, pp.385~407 (1987)
  3. Bardovi-Harlig, K., "Pragmatics in Language Teaching", pp.13~32 (2001), Cambridge University Press
  4. Biber, D., "Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English" (1999), Longman
  5. Canale, M., "Theoretical bases of communicative approache to second langaug teaching and testing", Applied Linguistics, 1, pp.1~47 (1980)
  6. EFL Teacher’s Course, "The Grammar Book: An ESL", pp.1999, Celce-Murcia, M.
  7. Cornell, A, "Realistic Goals in Teaching and Learning Phrasal Verbs", International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 23(4), pp.269~280 (1985)
  8. Hoffman, T, "Variable vs. Categorical Effects; Preposition Pied Piping and Stranding in British English Relative Clauses", Journal of English Linguistics, 33, pp.257~297 (2005)
  9. Hornstein, N., "Case Theory and Preposition Stranding", Linguistic Inquiry, 12(1), pp.55~91 (1981)
  10. Huddleston, R, "The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  11. Kao, R, "Where have the prepositions gone? A study of English prepositional verbs and input enhancement in instructed SLA", International Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, pp.195~215 (2001)
  12. 고우경, "Korean EFL learners' acquisition of preposition stranding and pied-piping.", Foreign Languages Education, 16(3), pp.123~144 (2009), 한국외국어교육학회
  13. Larsen-Freeman, D, "Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language", pp.251~266 (2001)
  14. McDaniel, D., "How Children's Relatives Solve a Problem for Minimalism", Language, 74(2), pp.308~334 (1998)
  15. Norris, J. M., "Effectiveness of L2 Instruction: A Research Synthesis and Quantitative Meta-analysis", Language Learning, 50, pp.417~528 (2000)
  16. Olshtain, E., "Input in Second Language Acquisition" (1985), Newbury house
  17. 박시원, "L2 Learners' Acquisition of Preposition Pied-Piping and Preposition Stranding", 영어학, 5(2), pp.327~351 (2005), 한국영어학회
  18. Radford, A., "An Introduction to English Sentence Structure" (2009), Cambridge University Press
  19. Rose, K. R., "Pragmatics and Language Learning Monograph Series 5", pp.52~63 (1994), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  20. Ross, J. R., "Constraints on Variables in Syntax" (1967), Indiana University Linguistics Club
  21. Ross, J. R., "Infinite Syntax!" (1986), Ablex
  22. Rueda, Yined T, "Developing Pragmatic Competence in a Foreign Language", Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 8, pp.169~182 (2006)
  23. Vellenga, H, "Learning Pragmatics from ESL & EFL Textbook: How Likely?", The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 8(2), pp.1~18 (2004)
  24. Wolfe-Quintero, K, "Learnability and the Acquisition of Extraction in Relative Clauses and Wh-questions", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, pp.39~70 (1989)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)