The Korean Suffix -Te as Spatial Deictic Tense
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper argues that the Korean suffix -te is not an evidential marker, nor a simple tense marker, but a spatial deictic tense that induces an evidential environment. The suffix -te not only denotes a temporally deictic past time, but also the speaker's spatial deictic vantage point at the reference time (cf. Faller (2004)), which serves as an anchoring point (i.e., “shifted here and now”) for evidentials. It is suggested that Korean has two distinctive deictic (indexical) tenses: simple deictic tense and spatial deictic tense. The difference is that the former does not necessarily require the reference to the speaker's own perceptual field or to his/her spatial location. This analysis provides a way to potentially incorporate even pure evidentials in other languages into the semantics of tense.
Abstract
This paper argues that the Korean suffix -te is not an evidential marker, nor a simple tense marker, but a spatial deictic tense that induces an evidential environment. The suffix -te not only denotes a temporally deictic past time, but also the speaker's spatial deictic vantage point at the reference time (cf. Faller (2004)), which serves as an anchoring point (i.e., “shifted here and now”) for evidentials. It is suggested that Korean has two distinctive deictic (indexical) tenses: simple deictic tense and spatial deictic tense. The difference is that the former does not necessarily require the reference to the speaker's own perceptual field or to his/her spatial location. This analysis provides a way to potentially incorporate even pure evidentials in other languages into the semantics of tense.
참고문헌 (19)
- Chung,K.S., "Deictic and Anaphoric Tense in Korean: A two-tiered approach", 석사, pp.1999
- Chung,K.S., "Space in Tense: The interaction of tense, aspect, evidentiality, and speech act in Korean", 박사, pp.2005
- Cinque,G., "Adverbs and Functional Heads: A cross-linguistic perspective" (1999), Oxford University Press
- Comrie,B., "Evidentials: Semantics and history. In : Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian, and neighboring languages", pp.1~12 (2000), Mouton de Gruyter
- Faller, M., "The Deictic Core of ‘Non-experienced Past’ in Cuzco Quechua", Journal of Semantics, 21, pp.45~85 (2004)
- Gim, C. K, "Kwuke sice hyengtaysouy uymi: Hoysang hyengtaysolul cuwngsimulo The Semantics of Korean tense morphemes: With focus on the retrospective morpheme -Te-", pp.45~116 (1980), Han-Geul
- Givon,T., "Syntax: an introduction. Amsterdam" (2001), J. Benjamins
- Han,D.W., "Kwukeuy Sicey Yenkuw ,A Study on Korean Tense" (1996), Kuwkehakhoy Taehaksa
- Im,H.B., "Tasi -Te-lul chacase ,-Te Revisited", pp.255~323 (1993), Kwukehak
- Izvorski. R., "Present perfect as an epistemic modal" (1997), Proceedings of SALT 7. Stanford University
- Kim,Y.J., "The Syntax and Semantics of Korean Case: The interpretation between lexical and semantic levels of representation", pp.1990
- Kratzer, A., "More Structural Analogies between Pronouns and Tenses" (1998), Proceedings of SALT 8. MIT
- Krifka,M., "Nominal Reference and Quantification in Event Semantics. In : Semantics and Contextual Expression", pp.75~115 (1989), Foris Publications Holland
- Lee,H.S., "Tense, Aspect, and Modality: A discourse-pragmatic analysis of verbal affixes in Korean from a typological perspective", 박사, pp.1991
- Nam.K.S., "Kwuke mwunpepuy sicemwunceyey kwanhan yenkwu ,A study of Korean Tense Phenomena" (1978), Top Press
- Sohn,H.M., "Retrospection in Korean", Language Research, 11, pp.87~103 (1975)
- Sohn, H. M., "Korean" (1994), Routledge
- Suh,C.S., "Kwuke Mwunpep ,A Korean Grammar" (1996), Hanyang University Press
- Yang,I.S., "Korean Syntax: case markers, delimiters, complementation, and relativization", 박사, pp.1972