음성언어와 수화언어의 공간인지 대조: 한중일 내외공간이동의 종점공간을 중심으로
A Contrastive Study of the Perception of Space between Spoken and Sign Languages: Focusing on the Endpoint Space of Internal and External Space-movement in Korea, China, and Japan
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines the internal and external space-moving verbs and endpoint spaces in Korean, Chinese, and Japanese sign languages from a cognitive linguistic perspective, comparing those with the three spoken languages. Sign language data was collected from dictionaries and native signers. The examples of the spoken languages are from Korean, Chinese, and Japanese national corpora. The findings show that (1) the three sign languages all mention three elements concerning space, that is, the inside, the outside, and the boundary, clearly having the internal space on the palm of hands and the external space on the back; (2) the sign language from Korea, China, and Japan all have a small number of uses of basic space-moving verbs. such as nagada, chu, and deru as well as a little linguistic ambiguity of space-moving verbs when they express a mobility from the inside to the outside, which is different from the corresponding spoken languages; (3) the differences of perceiving space between spoken and sign languages are bigger than those between spoken languages. These results are probably motivated by the iconicity and spatial language characteristics in sign languages, which allow them to describe spatial movement situations more specifically and expressively than spoken languages. On the other hand, most descriptions of spatial movement in spoken language seem to be addressed through the semantic extension of basic space-moving verbs.
Abstract
This study examines the internal and external space-moving verbs and endpoint spaces in Korean, Chinese, and Japanese sign languages from a cognitive linguistic perspective, comparing those with the three spoken languages. Sign language data was collected from dictionaries and native signers. The examples of the spoken languages are from Korean, Chinese, and Japanese national corpora. The findings show that (1) the three sign languages all mention three elements concerning space, that is, the inside, the outside, and the boundary, clearly having the internal space on the palm of hands and the external space on the back; (2) the sign language from Korea, China, and Japan all have a small number of uses of basic space-moving verbs. such as nagada, chu, and deru as well as a little linguistic ambiguity of space-moving verbs when they express a mobility from the inside to the outside, which is different from the corresponding spoken languages; (3) the differences of perceiving space between spoken and sign languages are bigger than those between spoken languages. These results are probably motivated by the iconicity and spatial language characteristics in sign languages, which allow them to describe spatial movement situations more specifically and expressively than spoken languages. On the other hand, most descriptions of spatial movement in spoken language seem to be addressed through the semantic extension of basic space-moving verbs.
참고문헌 (29)
- 白海燕, "｢出る｣｢出＋chu場所目的語｣｢나가다nagada", 나오다naoda｣ にみられる空間認知のずれについて, 2001, pp.(4), 109~120
- 조은정, "「でる」와 ‘나가다’의 의미에 대한 대조연구", 日本語敎育, (79), pp.75~87 (2017), 한국일본어교육학회[DOI]
- Chomsky, Noam, "Aspects of the Theory of Syntax" (1965), MIT Press
- De Saussure, Ferdinand, "Nature of the linguistic sign", Course in General Linguistics, 1, pp.65~70 (1916)
- Frishberg, Nancy, "The Signs of Language", pp.67~84 (1979), Harvard University Press
- 함계임, "인지언어학탐구의 현황과 과제", pp.2019~ (2019), 한국문화사
- 홍달오, "動詞 ‘들다", 나다’의 意味에 대한 認知言語學的 考察, 2010, pp.38(1), 131~153[DOI]
- 이효정, "영상도식을 활용한 ‘나다", 들다’의 의미 교육 방안, 2020, pp.59, 307~335[DOI]
- Jeon, Sootae, "Semantics of Korean Movement Verbs" (1987), Hankuk Munhwa Publishing House
- Lakoff, George, "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things" (1987), The University of Chicago Press
- 임지룡, "인지의미론" (1997), 탑출판사
- 임지룡, "인지의미론" (2017), 한국문화사
- 임지룡, "한국 수어의 도상적 양상과 의미 특성", 국어교육연구, (68), pp.63~88 (2018), 국어교육학회(since1969)[DOI]
- 임태성, "가상이동", pp.2018~ (2018), 한국문화사
- Makino, Seiichi, "Words and Space", pp.1978~ (1978), Tokai University Press
- Makino, Seiichi, "Uchi and Soto’s Language and Culture" (1996), Aruku
- Mandel, Mark, "On the Other Hand", pp.57~107 (1977), Academic Press
- Qi, Huyang, "Research on Spatial Issues in Modern Chinese", pp.1998~ (1998), Xuelin Press
- Shen, Guowei, "A History of Japanese-Chinese Vocabulary Exchange in Modern Times", pp.1994~ (1994), Kasama shoin
- 송미연, "한국수어의 생산적 수어 어휘에서 나타난 도상성 -이미지 형성 기법을 중심으로-", 한국청각언어장애교육연구, 11(1), pp.109~139 (2020), 한국청각언어장애교육학회[DOI]
- Stokoe, William C., "Studies in Linguistics Occasional Paper 8" (1960)
- Talmy, Leonard, "Fictive motion in language and ‘ception’", Language and space, 21, pp.1~276 (1996)
- Talmy, Leonard, "Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. 2" (2000), MIT press
- Taub, Sarah Florence, "Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- 鷲見幸美, "移動動詞に見る物理的空間の主観的把握ー｢出る｣｢入る｣｢横切る｣を例としてー", 言語文化研究叢書, pp.81~95 (2008)
- 염철, "중국어 동사 ‘进’과 한국어 동사 ‘들다’의 대조 연구", 중국어교육과 연구, (9), pp.73~100 (2009), 한국중국어교육학회
- 염철, "이동동사 ‘나다’와 ‘出’의 대조 연구", 중국학연구, (70), pp.135~159 (2014), 중국학연구회
- 염철, "趋向动词‘들다", 나다’与‘进, 중국학연구, pp.2016, (77)[DOI]