선택의문문과 이접의 관계에 대한 언어유형론적 고찰
A Typological Study of Alternative Question and Disjunction
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, we examine the relationship between alternative question and disjunction in terms of language typology. Alternative question and disjunction share some commonalities despite being separate concepts. The expression patterns of these two concepts vary in their degree of similarity and difference depending on the language. By considering factors such as the omission/compression, the existence of the overt connector, and the form of the connector, their distance between the two structures can be identified. Observing the relationship between alternative question and disjunction cross-linguistically reveals certain typological universals. These universals include the presence of external connective elements being more prominent in disjunctive structures, the phenomenon of omission of shared elements being more readily observed in disjunctive structures than in alternative question, and the omission of shared elements being more fluent with non-predicate constituents rather than predicates. The reason for these universals lies in the greater semantic separability and exclusivity between the two propositions in alternative question compared to those in disjunction, as well as the semantic proximity of alternative question to the juxtaposed two separate interrogative sentences. In languages where there are multiple markers of disjunction, thus dividing the conceptual space, the concept of Typical Disjunction is closer to the concept of alternative question than the concepts of Free Choice, Temporal Alternation, or Property Statement.
Abstract
In this paper, we examine the relationship between alternative question and disjunction in terms of language typology. Alternative question and disjunction share some commonalities despite being separate concepts. The expression patterns of these two concepts vary in their degree of similarity and difference depending on the language. By considering factors such as the omission/compression, the existence of the overt connector, and the form of the connector, their distance between the two structures can be identified. Observing the relationship between alternative question and disjunction cross-linguistically reveals certain typological universals. These universals include the presence of external connective elements being more prominent in disjunctive structures, the phenomenon of omission of shared elements being more readily observed in disjunctive structures than in alternative question, and the omission of shared elements being more fluent with non-predicate constituents rather than predicates. The reason for these universals lies in the greater semantic separability and exclusivity between the two propositions in alternative question compared to those in disjunction, as well as the semantic proximity of alternative question to the juxtaposed two separate interrogative sentences. In languages where there are multiple markers of disjunction, thus dividing the conceptual space, the concept of Typical Disjunction is closer to the concept of alternative question than the concepts of Free Choice, Temporal Alternation, or Property Statement.
참고문헌 (31)
- Ariel, Mira, "Why use or?", Linguistics, 56(5), pp.939~993 (2018)
- Asher, Ronald Eaton, "Tamil" (1989), Routledge
- Borg, Albert, "Maltese" (1997), Routledge
- 최윤지, "이접과 양태의 상관관계 고찰: ‘-인가’를 중심으로", 國語學, (60), pp.146~181 (2011), 국어학회[DOI]
- Chao, Yuen Ren, "A grammar of Spoken Chinese" (1968), University of California Press
- Davies, John, "Kobon" (1981), North-Holland Publishing Company
- Dhongde, Ramesh Vaman, "Marathi" (2009), John Benjamins
- Everett, Daniel Leonard, "Wari" (1997), Routledge
- Maribel Romero, "Disjunction, Focus, and Scope", Linguistic Inquiry, 35(2), pp.179~217 (2004)
- Haspelmath, Martin, "Coordinating Constructions" (2004), John Benjamins
- Haspelmath, Martin, "Language Typology and Syntactic Description Volume II: Complex Constructions", pp.1~51 (2007), Cambridge University Press
- Hualde, José Ignacio, "A Grammar of Basque" (2003), De Gruyter
- Karlsson, Fred, "Finnish: A Comprehensive Grammar" (2018), Routledge
- Kibrik, Andrej A, "Coordination in Upper Kuskokwim Athabaskan", Haspelmath, pp.537~553 (2004)
- 이정훈, "조사와 활용형의 범주통용 - ‘이’계 형식을 대상으로 -", 國語學, (45), pp.145~176 (2005), 국어학회
- 이의종, "이접-연접 연속체의 의미유형론", 제222차 통사론연구회 월례 연구모임 발표자료 (2022)
- Luo, Tianhua, "Interrogative Strategies: An Areal Typology of the Languages of China", Ph.D, pp.2013
- Mauri, Caterina, "The irreality of alternatives: towards a typology of disjunction", Studies in Language, 32(1), pp.22~55 (2008)
- Ohori, Toshio, "Coordinating Constructions", pp.41~66 (2004), John Benjamins
- Petrunin, Mikhail, "Comparative Grammar of Spanish, Portuguese, Italian and French" (2018), Independently published
- Peterson, David A., "Coordination in Hakha Lai(Tibeto-Burman)", Haspelmath, pp.333~356 (2004)
- Rennison, John R, "Koromfe" (1997), Routledge
- Roberts, John R, "Amele" (1987), Croom Helm
- Sadowska, Iwona, "Polish: A Comprehensive Grammar" (2012), Routledge
- Schaub, Willi, "Babungo" (1985), Croom Helm
- Shopen, Timothy, "Language Typology and Syntactic Description Volume II: Complex Constructions" (2007), Cambridge University Press
- Stilo, Donald, "Coordination in three Western Iranian languages", Haspelmath, pp.269~330 (2004)
- Taylor, Charles, "Nkore-Kiga" (1985), Croom Helm
- Wali, Kashi, "Kashmiri" (1997), Routledge
- Zimmermann, Thomas Ede, "Free choice disjunction and epistemic possibility", Natural Language Semantics, 8, pp.255~290 (2000)