본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

‘바라-’[望]의 교체형 ‘바래-’의 출현 과정에 대한 정량적 탐색

A Quantitative Analysis of Korean ‘non-standard’ pala-/palay- alternation.

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper argues that the ‘non-standard’ alternant palay- of Korean verb pala- ‘to hope/wish’ emerged as the result of paradigmatic analogy. Examination of corpus data reveals that pala-/palay- alternation can be associated with the morphological pattern of ha- ‘do’, a dominantly high-frequency element. Previous studies arguing for a paradigmatic analogy analysis of palay- either fall short of explaining the distribution of nominalized palam/palaym or fail to produce hard evidence for their proposals. Opposing scholars have also raised critical questions based on the timeline of Korean’s diachronic change, which have not been responded to. In the course of addressing these issues, this paper provides quantitative proof in favor of the paradigmatic analogy hypothesis, especially in comparison with other verbs that share similar stem-final morphophonology. Moreover, we point out that there buttals against such an analysis are based on incorrect generalizations regarding separate diachronic processes. The emergence of nominalized palaym,which our analysis initially seems not to predict, can be explained by the fact that stem reanalysis is usually centered around the alternant that precedes vowel-initial particles, and by probing other dialects of Korean.

Abstract

This paper argues that the ‘non-standard’ alternant palay- of Korean verb pala- ‘to hope/wish’ emerged as the result of paradigmatic analogy. Examination of corpus data reveals that pala-/palay- alternation can be associated with the morphological pattern of ha- ‘do’, a dominantly high-frequency element. Previous studies arguing for a paradigmatic analogy analysis of palay- either fall short of explaining the distribution of nominalized palam/palaym or fail to produce hard evidence for their proposals. Opposing scholars have also raised critical questions based on the timeline of Korean’s diachronic change, which have not been responded to. In the course of addressing these issues, this paper provides quantitative proof in favor of the paradigmatic analogy hypothesis, especially in comparison with other verbs that share similar stem-final morphophonology. Moreover, we point out that there buttals against such an analysis are based on incorrect generalizations regarding separate diachronic processes. The emergence of nominalized palaym,which our analysis initially seems not to predict, can be explained by the fact that stem reanalysis is usually centered around the alternant that precedes vowel-initial particles, and by probing other dialects of Korean.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Bae, Juchae, "Pronunciation of Korean" (2013), Samkyeongmunhwasa
  2. Bybee, Joan, "Phonology and Language Use" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  3. Cho, Seyong, "Special Issue in Memory of Bomsil Lee-Inmo (李仁模): Diachronic study of Umlauting", Journal of The Society of Korean Language and Literature, 22, pp.97~114 (1981)
  4. 최전승, "국어 움라우트 현상의 유추적 확대와 화용론", 우리말글, pp.157~226 (2004)
  5. 최전승, "현대국어 '바래-'(望)용언부류들의 확산의 역사성과 공시적 언어규범-언어변화의 진행에 대한 사회구성원들의 숨겨진 합의와 조정을 중심으로", 한국언어문학, 107, pp.19~82 (2018)
  6. Chung, Kyeongjae, "Historical Change of the Korean Conjugation System", Ph.d., pp.2015
  7. Jang, Yoonhee, "Middle Korean Sentence-Final Particles" (2002), Taehaksa
  8. 강희숙, , j, 한민족어문학, pp.2010, 57[DOI]
  9. ”: Focus on “pala” and “palay, "Seoncheongeomun", 2012, 67~78
  10. Kim, Areum, "Some Problems on Classification of Korean Word-final Endings ‘a(아)’ and ‘ə(어)’", Wonkwang Journal of Humanities, 10(2), pp.1~19 (2009)
  11. 김봉국, "복수기저형의 설정과 그 타당성 검토", 어학연구, 39(3), pp.559~578 (2003)
  12. Kim, Gyeong-A, "A Research on the Correlation between Paradigms and Semantic Relations", The Journal of Korean Language and Literature Education, 55, pp.155~180 (2008)
  13. 이동석, "중세국어 ‘오라-’와 현대국어 ‘오래-’의 비교 연구", 이중언어학, 25, pp.187~205 (2004)
  14. Lee, Ki-Moon, "A History of the Korean Language" (1998), Thaehaksa
  15. 이유라, "한국어 완화사"조금, 약간, 다소, 비교적, 꽤, 은근히, 살짝, 나름"의 선호 사용역 및 의미기능 비교 분석 : 구어체 문어(온라인 메신저)를 중심으로", 언어학연구, 70, pp.103~121 (2024)
  16. 임석규, "재분석에 의한 재구조화와 활용 패러다임", 형태론, 6(1), pp.5~23 (2004)
  17. "NIKL Online Text Message Corpus(v.1.1)" (2022)[URL]
  18. "NIKL Korean Dialogue Corpus (transcription) 2022(v.1.0)" (2023)[URL]
  19. "NIKL Korean Dialogue Corpus (transcription) 2020(v.1.4)" (2024)[URL]
  20. "NIKL Korean Dialogue Corpus (transcription) 2021(v.1.1)" (2024)[URL]
  21. Park, Changweon, "Vowel Change in Southern Gyeongsang Dialect and Relative Time-orders: Based on Hand-copied <Sukyeongoknangjwajeon>", Garamunhwa, pp.9~43 (1992)
  22. 박선우, "불규칙활용의 불규칙성에 대한 검토", 청람어문교육, 30, pp.223~249 (2004)
  23. Vaswani, Ashish, "Attention is All You Need", Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, pp.5998~6008 (2017)
  24. 양성희, "표준어 ‘바라-’와 비표준어 ‘바래-’의 사용 양상 연구", 국어국문학, 198, pp.63~98 (2022)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)