본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

도시희극 속의 탕아들: 『어떻게 저를 모르실 수가 2부』와 『동쪽으로』

Prodigals in Jacobean City Comedy: If You Know Not Me, You Know Nobody Part II and Eastward Ho

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The story of the prodigal son is one of the most popular comic plots on the English Renaissance stage, appearing as the main or subplot in almost forty plays. Though interpretations of the prodigal parable are common throughout the medieval period, they win popularity in the early modern period, widely adapted and circulated in verbal as well as in visual forms. In evaluating the cultural significance of this literary trend, recent critics have focused on exploring the economic contours of the prodigal story, especially in Jacobean city comedies. As O’Conner says, prodigals in Jacobean city comedies are the sons of London tradesmen and merchants, mostly apprentices, not the Elizabethan gentlemen prodigals. While the Elizabethan prodigals waste their good humanist education in literary activities, the Jacobean prodigals waste the wherewithal of their father’s or their master’s in economically fruitless activities such as drinking, gambling, whoring or risk-taking adventuring. Thus, prodigality becomes a significant tool in defining and judging the economic worth of young men in the city, and prodigal stories in Jacobean city comedies reflect Londoners’ pervasive worry about maintaining financial security which is accompanied and heightened by the vast expansion of credit relations in 16th and 17th century English society. The prodigal plot is conservatory in its social implication, in that it assumes the revolting son should return to what he originally rejects, and it is utilized to teach thrift as a way of surviving in the insecure market. However, city comedies “on the present day” disrupt and transform the narrative and its ruptures and variations show the commercial change and its attendant cultural change of economic values. This paper aims to examine how variations of the prodigal plot in city comedies reflect these changes and make them intelligible by reading two popular city comedies, Thomas Heywood’ If You Know Not Me, You Know Nobody Part II and Eastward Ho, co-authored by Ben Jonson, John Marston, and George Chapman.

Abstract

The story of the prodigal son is one of the most popular comic plots on the English Renaissance stage, appearing as the main or subplot in almost forty plays. Though interpretations of the prodigal parable are common throughout the medieval period, they win popularity in the early modern period, widely adapted and circulated in verbal as well as in visual forms. In evaluating the cultural significance of this literary trend, recent critics have focused on exploring the economic contours of the prodigal story, especially in Jacobean city comedies. As O’Conner says, prodigals in Jacobean city comedies are the sons of London tradesmen and merchants, mostly apprentices, not the Elizabethan gentlemen prodigals. While the Elizabethan prodigals waste their good humanist education in literary activities, the Jacobean prodigals waste the wherewithal of their father’s or their master’s in economically fruitless activities such as drinking, gambling, whoring or risk-taking adventuring. Thus, prodigality becomes a significant tool in defining and judging the economic worth of young men in the city, and prodigal stories in Jacobean city comedies reflect Londoners’ pervasive worry about maintaining financial security which is accompanied and heightened by the vast expansion of credit relations in 16th and 17th century English society. The prodigal plot is conservatory in its social implication, in that it assumes the revolting son should return to what he originally rejects, and it is utilized to teach thrift as a way of surviving in the insecure market. However, city comedies “on the present day” disrupt and transform the narrative and its ruptures and variations show the commercial change and its attendant cultural change of economic values. This paper aims to examine how variations of the prodigal plot in city comedies reflect these changes and make them intelligible by reading two popular city comedies, Thomas Heywood’ If You Know Not Me, You Know Nobody Part II and Eastward Ho, co-authored by Ben Jonson, John Marston, and George Chapman.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 김영아, "토마스 헤이우드의 어떻게 저를 모르실 수가. 2부: 두 개의 런던과 상인상의 분화", 중세근세영문학, 26(2), pp.29~54 (2016), 한국중세근세영문학회
  2. 김영아, "신용경제와 빚진 자를 용서하기: 도시희극에 극화된 ‘자선’의 모습들", 중세르네상스영문학, 23(2), pp.1~23 (2015), 한국중세근세영문학회
  3. 이미영, "『칩사이드의 정숙한 처녀』: 칩사이드를 중심으로", 중세르네상스영문학, 22(1), pp.69~93 (2014), 한국중세근세영문학회
  4. 임정인, "“정직하고 기개 높은 도제들에게”: 헤이우드 희극에 나타나는 런던 도제 편력담 연구", 영미문학연구, (24), pp.117~144 (2013), 영미문학연구회
  5. 페르낭 브로델, "물질문명과 자본주의 III-1. 세계의 시간" (1997), 까치
  6. Baines, Barbara J, "Thomas Heywood" (1984), Twayne
  7. Beck, Ervin, "Terence Improved: The Paradigm of the Prodigal Son in English Renaissance Comedy", Renaissance Drama, 6, pp.107~122 (1973)
  8. Bentry, G. E., "The Jacobean and Caroline Stage, 7 Vols" (1941), Oxford UP
  9. Bonahue, Edward T., "Social Control, the City and the Market: Heywood’s 2 If You Know Not Me, You Know Nobody", The Southeastern Renaissance Conference, pp.75~90 (1994)
  10. Cohen, Ralph Alan, "The Function of Setting in Eastward Ho", The Southeastern Renaissance Conference, pp.85~96 (1973)
  11. Dowd. Michelle M., "A Gentleman May Wonder: Inheritance, Travel, and the Prodigal Son on the Jacobean Stage", Renaissance Drama, 41(1), pp.113~137 (2014)
  12. Edmondson, Paul, "The Shakespeare Apocrypha" (2007), Edwin Mellen
  13. Fossen, Van. R. W., "Eastward Ho", pp.1~58 (1979), Manchester UP
  14. Frye, Northrop, "The Anatomy of Criticism" (1957), Princeton UP
  15. Gibbons, Brian, "Jacobean City Comedy. A Study of Satiric Plays by Jonson, Marston and Middleton" (1980), Methuen
  16. Heywood. Thomas, "If You Know Not Me, You Know Nobody, Part I and Part II" (2009), Benediction Classics
  17. Howard, Jean E., "The Culture of Capital, Property, Cities and Knowledge in Early Modern England" (2002), Routledge
  18. Howard, Jean E, "Theater of a City: The Places of London Comedy, 1598-1642" (2007), U of Pennsylvania P
  19. Howard, Jean E., "Barbara Sebek and Stephen Deng. Global Traffic: Discourses and Practices of Trade in English Literature and Culture from 1550 to 1700", pp.265~274 (2008), MacMillan
  20. Ingram, Jill Phillips, "Economies of Obligation in Eastward Ho", The Ben Jonson Journal, 11(1), pp.21~40 (2004)
  21. Ingram, Jill Phillips, "Idioms of Self-Interest: Credit, Identity, and Property in English Renaissance Literature" (2010), Routledge
  22. Jankowski, Theodora A, "Class Categorization, and the Problem of ‘Gentle’ Identity in The Royall King and the Loyall Subject and Eastward Ho!", Medieval & Renaissance Drama in England, 19, pp.144~174 (2006)
  23. Jenstad, Janelle Day, "The Elizabethan Theatre XV", pp.181~202 (2002), P.D.Meany
  24. Jonson, Ben, "Eastward Ho" (1979), Manchester UP
  25. Kay, W. David, "Parodic Wit and Social Satire in Chapman, Jonson, and Marston’s Eastward Ho!", English Literary Renaissance, 42(3), pp.391~424 (2012)
  26. 김태원, "Markers of Difference and Sense of Englishness: Language and Geography in1 William Haughton’s Englishmen for My Money", 중세르네상스영문학, 24(2), pp.1~26 (2016), 한국중세근세영문학회
  27. Lake, Peter, "The Antichrist’s Lewd Hat: Protestants, Papists and Players in Post-Reformation England" (2002), Yale UP
  28. Leggatt, Alexander, "Citizen Comedy in the Age of Shakespeare" (1973), U of Toronto P
  29. Leinwand, Theodore B, "Theatre, Finance and Society in Early Modern England" (1999), Cambridge UP
  30. McLuskie, Kathleen E, "Dekker and Heywood: Professional Dramatists" (1994), St. Martin’s P
  31. Muldrew, Craig, "The Economy of Obligation: the Culture of Credit and Social Relations in Early Modern England" (1998), MacMillan
  32. O’Connell, Michael, "Essays in Memory of Richard Helgerson" (2012), U of Delaware P
  33. Ribner, Irving, "The English History Play in the Age of Shakespeare" (1957), Princeton UP
  34. Sebek, Barbara, "Global Traffic: Discourses and Practices of Trade in English Literature and Culture from 1550 to 1700", pp.1~15 (2008), MacMillan
  35. Sherman, Anita Gilman, "The Status of Charity in Thomas Heywood’s If You Know Not Me You Know Nobody II", Medieval and Renaissance Drama in England, 12, pp.99~120 (1999)
  36. Sullivan, Ceri, "The Rhetoric of Credit: Merchants in Early Modern Writing" (2002), Associated University Presses
  37. Williams, Raymond, "Marxism and Literature" (1977), Oxford UP
  38. Young, Alan R, "The English Prodigal Son Plays: A Theatrical Fashion of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries" (1979), Universitȁt Salzburg

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)