해방 직후 자기비판소설의 윤리성과 정치성
A study on Ethics and Politics in the novels of self-criticism just after the Korean Liberation
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to examine the connection between ethics and politics in the novels of self-criticism just after the Korean Liberation. Especially this study pays attention to three novels that are represent the types of self-criticism, Lee, Tae-Jun's Hae-Bang-Jeon-Hoo(해방전후), Chae, Man-Sik's Min-Jog-Ey-Joe-In(민족의 죄인) and Ji, Ha-Ryun's Do-Jeong(도정) . These novels are analyzed focusing on criterion of ethics and result of criticism. Hae-Bang-Jeon-Hoo(해방전후) and Min-Jog-Ey-Joe-In(민족의 죄인) reveal same critierion of ethics that discern virtue and vice based on nation. But ethical contents of these novels are totally different. In Hae-Bang-Jeon-Hoo(해방전후) , the main character betrays the nation in colonial period for the nation after liberation. So the logic in this novel seems to be very paradoxical. In that point, it can be said that this novel represents politics of self-criticism. In Min-Jog-Ey-Joe-In(민족의 죄인), the main character reveals two kinds of escapes, escape from the consciousness of guilt to blame the nation and escape to the consciousness of gulit to blame his nature. And then he makes up his guilt original sin. As a consequence, the guilty conscious of main character is vanished and his self-respect is recovered. This novel represents ethics of nation and self-criticism without real ethics. Do-Jeong(도정) shows the ethics of freedom and responsibility beyond ethics of nation. The main character of this novel introspects his behavior in colonial period and renovates himself. But this novel is also political in that his introspection and self-renovation is a process to affiliate himself with the Communist Party. This novel represents the connection between ethics and politics harmoniously.
Abstract
This study aims to examine the connection between ethics and politics in the novels of self-criticism just after the Korean Liberation. Especially this study pays attention to three novels that are represent the types of self-criticism, Lee, Tae-Jun's Hae-Bang-Jeon-Hoo(해방전후), Chae, Man-Sik's Min-Jog-Ey-Joe-In(민족의 죄인) and Ji, Ha-Ryun's Do-Jeong(도정) . These novels are analyzed focusing on criterion of ethics and result of criticism. Hae-Bang-Jeon-Hoo(해방전후) and Min-Jog-Ey-Joe-In(민족의 죄인) reveal same critierion of ethics that discern virtue and vice based on nation. But ethical contents of these novels are totally different. In Hae-Bang-Jeon-Hoo(해방전후) , the main character betrays the nation in colonial period for the nation after liberation. So the logic in this novel seems to be very paradoxical. In that point, it can be said that this novel represents politics of self-criticism. In Min-Jog-Ey-Joe-In(민족의 죄인), the main character reveals two kinds of escapes, escape from the consciousness of guilt to blame the nation and escape to the consciousness of gulit to blame his nature. And then he makes up his guilt original sin. As a consequence, the guilty conscious of main character is vanished and his self-respect is recovered. This novel represents ethics of nation and self-criticism without real ethics. Do-Jeong(도정) shows the ethics of freedom and responsibility beyond ethics of nation. The main character of this novel introspects his behavior in colonial period and renovates himself. But this novel is also political in that his introspection and self-renovation is a process to affiliate himself with the Communist Party. This novel represents the connection between ethics and politics harmoniously.
참고문헌 (25)
- 가라타니 고진, "윤리 21" (2003), 사회평론
- 가라타니 고진, "트랜스크리틱" (2006), 한길사
- 게오르그 짐멜, "근대 세계관의 역사-칸트 · 괴테·니체" (2007), 도서출판 길
- 김윤식, "한국소설사" (1993), 예하
- 김윤식, "한국현대문학사" (1994), 일지사
- 릴라 간디, "포스트식민주의란 무엇인가" (2000), 현실문화연구
- 송기한, "해방공간의 비평문학 1~3" (1991), 태학사
- 슬라보예 지젝, "당신의 징후를 즐겨라" (1997), 한나래
- 알렌카 주판치치, "실재의 윤리-칸트와 라캉" (2004), 도서출판
- 임마누엘 칸트, "실천이성비판" (2004), 아카넷
- 구재진, "<해방전후>의 기억과 망각-탈식민의 서사전략", 한중인문학연구 (2006), 한중인문학회
- 김은정, "이태준의 「해방전후」연구 -욕망과 플롯을 중심으로-", 배달말, (30), pp.221~243 (2002), 배달말학회
- 김윤식, "해방공간의 문학-지식인 작가의 문제점을 중심으로 in : 해방전후사의 인식 2" (2007), 한길사
- 김동석, "채만식 소설의 내적 원리 연구 - 해방기를 중심으로", 민족문화연구, (41), pp.311~345 (2004), 민족문화연구원
- 노상래, "해방기 자기고백 소설 연구 1", 한민족어문학 (1997), 한민족어문학회
- 신희교, "해방기 채만식의 자기비판소설에 나타나난 서술 수준-민족의 죄인을 대상으로", 한국문학이론과비평 (2002)
- 유철상, "해방기 민족적 죄의식의 두 가지 유형", 우리말글, 36, pp.343~369 (2006), 우리말글학회
- 이병순, "해방기 자기비판소설 연구", 국어국문학 (1995)
- 이형빈, "고백적 글쓰기의 표현방식 연구-해방공간의 소설을 중심으로", 석사, pp.1999
- 전흥남, "해방공간의 자기비판 소설 연구", 한국언어문학 (1995), 한국언어문학회
- 정종현, "제국 민족 담론의 경계와 식민지적 주체", 상허학보, (13), pp.97~130 (2004), 상허학회
- 정호웅, "해방공간의 자기비판소설 연구", 박사, pp.1993
- 최용석, "이태준의 <解放前後>에 나타난 글쓰기 전략 고찰", 현대소설연구, (24), pp.209~232 (2004), 한국현대소설학회
- 호테이 토시히로, "일제말기 일본어 소설연구", 석사, pp.1996
- 정종현, "제국 민족 담론의 경계와 식민지적 주체 in : 이태준과 현대소설사" (2004), 깊은샘