19세기 말 고소설 유통의 전환과 ‘민족지’로서의 고소설 - 모리스 쿠랑 『한국서지』 한국고소설 관련 기술의 근대 학술사적 의미
19th Century Korean Classic Novel Circulation's Transition and Korean Classic Novel as Ethnopgraphy
2
조회
0
다운로드
26
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As Western Europeans experience the publishing culture on Korean Classic novel, there occurs a huge Transition on Korean Classic novel circulation. That is, Korean Classic novel symbolizes image that is quipped in British Museum and France Institute of Language Orientals. And foreign readers․researchers' appearances that reads and investigates Korean Classic novel. Namely, Korean Classic novel is a kind of hybrid text, and gained a definition of understanding and communication media between cross culture. This article wants to observe how Korean Classic novel was recalled as academic target that will examine Korean ethnicity. Related to this, this article viewed academic historical context from that generation which Maurice Courant's Bibliographie Coréenne(1894~1896, 1901) Korean Classic novel discussions and list of Korean Classic novel preserved. Especially, through bibliographic research on Korean Classic novel when Courant was circulated during late 19th century, it tried to look into the types of aspects of Korean Classic novel and what the academic source was, and then examine its meaning. Courant materialized the Korean Classic novel, which were circulated in the late 19th century, into “(1) Chinese Romance’, (2) Korean Romance in Chinese (3) Korean Romance that handled Chinese (4) Korean Romance that handled Korean”. Here, the reason it was possible to classify into 'Chinese' and 'Korean' was because there were ariticles of Chinese literature from Western. Courant was able to know historical information about Korean-translated Chinese novel list through A. Wylie's Notes on Chinese literature(1867), and also know about life of China and its people through W. F. Mayers's The Chinese reader's manual(1874). Within the classification between Courant's 'Chinese' and 'Korean', (4)Type(Romance about Korean) was raised as Korean literature's core research target. Courant's Korean Classic novel essays experienced Korean Classic novel's publishing culture in the late 19th century, and it referenced W. A. Aston and Okakura Yosisaburo's essays which studied Korean literature. Courant's Korean Classic novel essays composed things like Korean grammar and dictionary, and as Korean language is discovered, it met the flow of Korean literature at that time which was 'mother tongue=Korean language' in France․Japanese scientific field. Courant showed identical viewpoint that it was seen as insufficient story in Korean Classic novel and as readings for general public. However, the reading comprehension and translation level on Courant's Korean Classic novel was at a high level that was not comparable to H. N. Allen's Korean Tales(1889), representative English version for Korean Classic novel. That is Paris missionaries, which was accorded with Korean linguistic basis that Catholic missionaries maintained. Courant was able to clearly find world of linguistic expressions that Korean Novel novel essays showed and also Korean's life which was configured in that place. Such aspects where Courant's Korean Classic novel essays are left behind are actually, beyond Western European's Korean literature, are possibilities and ways which can arrive at the point of horizontal communication between diverse culture, and genuine understanding and communication.
Abstract
As Western Europeans experience the publishing culture on Korean Classic novel, there occurs a huge Transition on Korean Classic novel circulation. That is, Korean Classic novel symbolizes image that is quipped in British Museum and France Institute of Language Orientals. And foreign readers․researchers' appearances that reads and investigates Korean Classic novel. Namely, Korean Classic novel is a kind of hybrid text, and gained a definition of understanding and communication media between cross culture. This article wants to observe how Korean Classic novel was recalled as academic target that will examine Korean ethnicity. Related to this, this article viewed academic historical context from that generation which Maurice Courant's Bibliographie Coréenne(1894~1896, 1901) Korean Classic novel discussions and list of Korean Classic novel preserved. Especially, through bibliographic research on Korean Classic novel when Courant was circulated during late 19th century, it tried to look into the types of aspects of Korean Classic novel and what the academic source was, and then examine its meaning. Courant materialized the Korean Classic novel, which were circulated in the late 19th century, into “(1) Chinese Romance’, (2) Korean Romance in Chinese (3) Korean Romance that handled Chinese (4) Korean Romance that handled Korean”. Here, the reason it was possible to classify into 'Chinese' and 'Korean' was because there were ariticles of Chinese literature from Western. Courant was able to know historical information about Korean-translated Chinese novel list through A. Wylie's Notes on Chinese literature(1867), and also know about life of China and its people through W. F. Mayers's The Chinese reader's manual(1874). Within the classification between Courant's 'Chinese' and 'Korean', (4)Type(Romance about Korean) was raised as Korean literature's core research target. Courant's Korean Classic novel essays experienced Korean Classic novel's publishing culture in the late 19th century, and it referenced W. A. Aston and Okakura Yosisaburo's essays which studied Korean literature. Courant's Korean Classic novel essays composed things like Korean grammar and dictionary, and as Korean language is discovered, it met the flow of Korean literature at that time which was 'mother tongue=Korean language' in France․Japanese scientific field. Courant showed identical viewpoint that it was seen as insufficient story in Korean Classic novel and as readings for general public. However, the reading comprehension and translation level on Courant's Korean Classic novel was at a high level that was not comparable to H. N. Allen's Korean Tales(1889), representative English version for Korean Classic novel. That is Paris missionaries, which was accorded with Korean linguistic basis that Catholic missionaries maintained. Courant was able to clearly find world of linguistic expressions that Korean Novel novel essays showed and also Korean's life which was configured in that place. Such aspects where Courant's Korean Classic novel essays are left behind are actually, beyond Western European's Korean literature, are possibilities and ways which can arrive at the point of horizontal communication between diverse culture, and genuine understanding and communication.
참고문헌 (21)
- J. Ross, "존 로스의 한국사-서양 언어로 기록된 최초의 한국 역사" (2010), 살림
- M. Courant, "프랑스 문헌학자 모리스 쿠랑이 본 한국의 역사와 문화" (2010), 살림
- M. Courant, "韓國書誌-修訂飜譯版" (1997), 一潮閣
- W. E. Griffis, "은자의 나라, 한국" (1998), 집문당
- A. Wylie, "Notes on Chinese literature", pp.60~ (1867), American Presbyterian Mission Press
- B. Trollope, "Corean Books and Their Authors", Transactions of the Korea Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 21, ~ (1932)
- H. N. Allen, "Korean tales" (1889), Londres
- W. F. Mayers, "The Chinese reader's manual" (1874)
- W. G. Aston, "On Corean popular literature", Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan, 18 (1890)
- 岡倉由三郎, "朝鮮の文學", 哲學雜誌, 8(74~75), pp.4~5 (1893)
- 마이클 김, "서양인들이 본 조선후기와 일제초기 출판문화의 모습 - 대중소설의 수용과유통문제를 중심으로", 열상고전연구, 19 (2004)
- 류대영, "초기 미국선교사 연구" (2001), 한국기독교역사연구소
- 이만열, "언더우드 자료집" (2005), 연세대 국학자료원
- 이상현, "언더우드의 이중어사전 간행과 한국어의 재편과정", 동방학지, (151), pp.223~278 (2010), 국학연구원
- 이상현, "묻혀진 <심청전> 정전화의 계보 -알렌(H. N. Allen), 호소이(細井肇), 게일(J. S. Gale) <심청전> 번역본의 연대기-", 고소설연구, (32), pp.405~456 (2011), 한국고소설학회
- 이상현, "알렌 <백학선전>영역본 연구 -모리스 쿠랑의 고소설 비평을 통해 본 알렌 고소설영역본의 의미-", Comparative Korean Studies, 20(1), pp.289~335 (2012), 국제비교한국학회
- 이상현, "한국 고전번역가의 초상, 게일(James Scarth Gale)의 고전학 담론과 고소설 번역의 지평" (2013), 소명출판
- 이은령, "『한어문전』의 문법기술과 품사구분 -문화소통의 관점에서 다시 보기-", 프랑스학연구, 56(56), pp.177~210 (2011), 프랑스학회
- 이혜은, "꼴레쥬 드 프랑스 소장 한국 고서의 현황과 활용방안", 한국문헌정보학회지, 45(4), pp.235~251 (2011), 한국문헌정보학회
- 황호덕, "개념과 역사, 근대 한국의 이중어사전", pp.1~2 (2012), 박문사
- D. Bouchez, "韓國學의 先驅者 모리스 꾸랑", 동방학지, 51-52 (1986), 연세대 국학연구원
