1920년대 일본어 조선동화집의 개작 양상 - 『조선동화집』(1924)과의 관련양상을 중심으로 -

Abstract

This paper took up the Chosun fairy tale collection which was written in various Japanese issued until 1926. And after checking that, the influential relation was considered. It was confirmed by this research that more than 8 pieces of story in the report of the General Government of Chosun investigated in 1913 and fact common to "the Chosun fairy tale collection" (The General Government of Chosun, 1924) that Umekichi Tanaka adapted exist. So the change was considered based on comparative examination of story in 1913 and 1924 in the main subject. And the contents of a Rewrite in the Chosun fairy tale collection issued after it could be considered positively. A study to the "Chosun fairy tale collection" of the General Government of Chosun gets into full swing after 1990's. But it wasn't considered about a report of 1913. Argument to the contents of the Rewrite couldn't sneak out of the reach of the inference with that. The significance of this paper is to indicate that, and new study direction was opened. And this research compared "The Chosun fairy tale collection"(1924) and Ashida's Japanese textbook(1923-4) with a report of 1913. The aspect which feels considers the meaning that the General Government of Chosun collected a story and issued the fairy tale collection and the Chosun fairy tale collection is wide in 1926 could be considered positively. After the Rewrite of the performed fairy tale was considered multilaterally in 1920's by this research like the above, the opportunity which can analyze the respective editor's aim and directionality of the Rewrite in three dimensions could be established. As a result, Tanaka's fairy tale collection maintains the contents on a report of 1913 overall, and it's possible to confirm that it was adapted using noble Japanese. After it was compared in a Japanese textbook of Ashida compiled, Tanaka was different from Ashida. Tanaka describes the contents about which a main character lies just as it is and maintains a motif and an outline faithfully in comparative way. On the other hand, Nakamura idealizes beautiful Chosun story and is adapting freely compared with Tanaka. But the other fairy tale collections are conscious of close friendship in Chosun and Japan intentionally, and are the different contents. Tanaka's fairy tale collection is different from Nakamura’s fairy tale collection on the one hand, and Japanese close friendship isn't being emphasized with Chosun. Tachikawa’s fairy tale collection is the fairy tale collection ignored perfectly so far in spite of its importance. Tachikawa confirmed that it was adapted based on Tanaka's fairy tale collection though he was conscious of narrating fairy tale. It was possible to confirm that Tachikawa’s fairy tale collection was adapted freely further compared with Nakamura’s fairy tale collection. Both of two are Tokyo in Japan and Nakamura and Tachikawa’s fairy tale collection is issued targeted for the Japanese reader. Tachikawa adapted Chosun story more freely than Nakamura. Tachikawa changed brother tan into the next tan of aged people which is often seen as Japanese reminiscences. A character changes big with this, and person setting is changing big. Such as Tachikawa inserts the song as well as being conscious of narrating fairy tale and adding an explanation to the forequarter and the second half part, the exceptional Rewrite is indicated.