본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

염상섭 장편소설의 동정자(sympathizer) 형상과 다이쇼(大正) 생명주의 - 『사랑과 죄』, 『삼대』를 중심으로

The Symbol of Sympathizer in Yeom, Sangseop's Novel and Taishow Life-ism - Focused on the Love and Crime and Samdae

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

The purpose of this paper is to show that the symbol of the sympathizer in the Yeom, Sangseop's novel was affected by the art theory of romanticism which had been flowed in through Japan of the early modern literature. In other words, with explaining the context that major achievements of modern novels, which are represented by Yeom, Sangseop, could not but be related to the historical origin of the Korean modern literary history in any way, the paper aims to reveal the problems inherent in the modernity of the Korean literature. For this, focused on the Love and Crime and Samdae that are relatively characterized with the symbol of sympathizers, the trace of Taishow Life-ism in those novels was reconstructed. ‘Life’ was the primary keyword of the literary discourse supporting the harmoniously united self, the art, and the contemporary model. That Yeom, Sangseop translated this word into ‘personality’, understood it on this ground, and uniquely stated the art theory was well presented in the Personality and Arts. His novels are regarded as masterpieces which criticized the family system violating the human personality and satirized the social system not allowing the free love as an expression of freedom. That is, in those days of the Yeom, Sangseop’s generation, ‘love’ was institutionally contradictory to ‘family’ which oppressed the personality, the individual’s inner life, and his early novels, What did you get?, and Love and Crime belong to the novels that made the issue of the free love and the family system respectively. Nonetheless, Yeom, Sangseop incessantly searched for the harmonious unity between ‘the individual inner life’ and ‘the national life’ in his novels. His efforts for the unity, in the novel of Samdae, are embodied in the character, Jo, Deokgi who tried to settle the conflict that emerged at the level of the ideology, the desire, and the morality. And the symbols of the sympathizer and the centrist are the central human character in his novel from Mansejeon to Hyopoong.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to show that the symbol of the sympathizer in the Yeom, Sangseop's novel was affected by the art theory of romanticism which had been flowed in through Japan of the early modern literature. In other words, with explaining the context that major achievements of modern novels, which are represented by Yeom, Sangseop, could not but be related to the historical origin of the Korean modern literary history in any way, the paper aims to reveal the problems inherent in the modernity of the Korean literature. For this, focused on the Love and Crime and Samdae that are relatively characterized with the symbol of sympathizers, the trace of Taishow Life-ism in those novels was reconstructed. ‘Life’ was the primary keyword of the literary discourse supporting the harmoniously united self, the art, and the contemporary model. That Yeom, Sangseop translated this word into ‘personality’, understood it on this ground, and uniquely stated the art theory was well presented in the Personality and Arts. His novels are regarded as masterpieces which criticized the family system violating the human personality and satirized the social system not allowing the free love as an expression of freedom. That is, in those days of the Yeom, Sangseop’s generation, ‘love’ was institutionally contradictory to ‘family’ which oppressed the personality, the individual’s inner life, and his early novels, What did you get?, and Love and Crime belong to the novels that made the issue of the free love and the family system respectively. Nonetheless, Yeom, Sangseop incessantly searched for the harmonious unity between ‘the individual inner life’ and ‘the national life’ in his novels. His efforts for the unity, in the novel of Samdae, are embodied in the character, Jo, Deokgi who tried to settle the conflict that emerged at the level of the ideology, the desire, and the morality. And the symbols of the sympathizer and the centrist are the central human character in his novel from Mansejeon to Hyopoong.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 염상섭, "염상섭 전집" (1987), 민음사
  2. 김윤식, "염상섭연구" (1987), 서울대출판부
  3. 김경수, "염상섭 장편소설 연구" (1999), 일조각
  4. 김양선, "식민지적 근대성의 한 양상, 1930년대 소설과 근대성의 지형학" (2002), 소명출판
  5. 류보선, "민족과 계급, 리얼리즘의 두 좌표, In 한국 근대문학의 정치적 (무)의식" (2005), 소명출판
  6. 이보영, "역사적 위기와 비평적 대응(1), In 염상섭문학론" (2003), 금문서적
  7. 이보영, "저항적 중심의 태동--사랑과 죄, In 난세의 문학" (2001), 예림기획
  8. 이보영, "염상섭과 베르그송", 月刊 文學 (1993), 월간문학사
  9. 鈴木貞美, "大正生命主義硏究のいま, 大正生命主義と現代" (1995), 河出書房新社
  10. 廚川白村, "近世文學十講" (1933), 改造出版社
  11. 錦田義富, "ベルグソンの哲學" (1913), 民友社
  12. 淡野安太郞, "ベルグソン" (1958), 勁草書房
  13. 宇野浩二, "文学の靑春期" (1986), 沖積舍
  14. 絓秀實, "日本近代文學の誕生" (1995), 太田出版
  15. 松本三之介, "明治思想史: 近代國家の創設から個の覺醒まで" (1996), 新曜社
  16. 藤田正勝, "現代思想としての西田幾多郞" (1998), 講談社
  17. 南博·社會心理硏究所, "大正文化" (1987), 勁草書房

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)