Pragmatic Discourse Markers you know and sort of in Korean EFL Teacher Corpus
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The study aims to investigate and compare usage of pragmatic discourse markers you know and sort of between Korean English teachers and native English teachers (hereinafter, KET and NET) in EFL teacher corpus, a spoken corpus collected from English learning classes (Kwon & Lee, 2014). To select focal pragmatic discourse markers, two word lists are extracted and compared using Keyword in WordSmith 7.0. (Scott, 2016). The study analyzes the functional and structural distribution of you know and sort of in KET and NET corpora. The results show that the KETs used pragmatic discourse markers you know as a gap filler between utterances far more frequently than the NETs. The NETs used sort of, mostly as a pragmatic discourse marker imposing mitigating effect, while the KETs did not use it at all; instead, the KETs uttered kind of almost two times more than the NETs. Both KETs and NETs used kind of more as a non-pragmatic discourse marker, indicating ‘a type of,’ rather than as a pragmatic discourse marker, to impose mitigating effect. Limitations of the study and future research directions are discussed
Abstract
The study aims to investigate and compare usage of pragmatic discourse markers you know and sort of between Korean English teachers and native English teachers (hereinafter, KET and NET) in EFL teacher corpus, a spoken corpus collected from English learning classes (Kwon & Lee, 2014). To select focal pragmatic discourse markers, two word lists are extracted and compared using Keyword in WordSmith 7.0. (Scott, 2016). The study analyzes the functional and structural distribution of you know and sort of in KET and NET corpora. The results show that the KETs used pragmatic discourse markers you know as a gap filler between utterances far more frequently than the NETs. The NETs used sort of, mostly as a pragmatic discourse marker imposing mitigating effect, while the KETs did not use it at all; instead, the KETs uttered kind of almost two times more than the NETs. Both KETs and NETs used kind of more as a non-pragmatic discourse marker, indicating ‘a type of,’ rather than as a pragmatic discourse marker, to impose mitigating effect. Limitations of the study and future research directions are discussed
참고문헌 (32)
- 안동환, "영어 담화표지 though에 관한 코퍼스 분석연구", 언어과학, 20(2), pp.123~143 (2013), 한국언어과학회
- Anderson, G., "Discourse markers:description and theory", pp.147~170 (1998), Benjamins
- Aijmer, K., "Pragmatic markers in spoken interlanguage", Nordic Journal of English Studies, 3(1), pp.173~190 (2004)
- "Functions of discourse markers you know in a Saudi learner corpus" (2017)[URL]
- Bondi, M., "Keyness in text", pp.43~48 (2011), John Benjamins
- "Definition for you know in Cambridge online dictionary"[URL]
- "Concordance"[URL]
- Costas, G., "Corpus approaches to discourse: A critical review" (2018), Routledge
- Crystal, D., "Another look at, well, you know", English Today, 13, pp.47~49 (1988)
- Ding, R., "Discourse markers in local and native English teachers’ talk in Hong Kong EFL classroom interaction: A corpus-based study", International Journal of Language & Linguistics, 2(5), pp.65~75 (2015)
- Hasan, R., "The semiotics of culture and language, vol 1: Language as social semiotic", pp.105~162 (1984), Frances Pinter
- Hellermann, J, "Language which is not taught: The discourse marker use of beginning adult learners of English", Journal of Pragmatics, 39(1), pp.157~179 (2007)
- 정채관, "2015 개정 영어과 교육과정에 따른 기본 어휘 및 외래어 목록 변화형 연구: 코퍼스적 접근", 외국어교육연구, 31(2), pp.175~201 (2017), 외국어교육연구소[DOI]
- Jung, Woo-hyun, "Attitudes of Korean EFL Learners Towards Varieties of English", 영어교육, 60(4), pp.239~260 (2005), 한국영어교육학회
- Li, W., "A corpus-based investigation of actually as a pragmatic marker by Chinese learners of English", Linguistics and Literature Studies, 3(5), pp.213~219 (2015)
- Kecskes, I., "Foreign Language and Mother Tongue" (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum
- 권예은, "Lexical bundle analysis in an EFL teacher corpus : comparison between Korean EFL and native EFL teacher talk", 박사, 영어교육학과, pp.2013
- 권예은, "Lexical Bundles in the Korean EFL Teacher Talk Corpus: A Comparison Between Non-native and Native English Teachers", Journal of Asia TEFL, 11(3), pp.73~103 (2014), 아시아테플
- Mauranen, A., "Academic discourse across disciplines", pp.271~294 (2006), Peter Lang
- Müller, S., "Discourse markers in native and non-native English Discourse" (2005), John Benjamins
- Nam, S. W., "Korean college EFL students' use of English discourse markers", 석사, pp.2014
- 박명수, "Use of Discourse Markers kind of and sort of in Modern American English", 현대영어교육, 16(1), pp.21~37 (2015), 현대영어교육학회
- Polat, B., "Investigating acquisition of discourse markers through a developmental learner corpus", Journal of Pragmatics, 43(15), pp.3745~3756 (2011)
- Scott, M., "PC analysis of key words – and key key words", System, 25(1), pp.1~13 (1997)
- Scott, M., "Keywords and corpus analysis in language education" (2006), John Benjamins
- Scott, M., "Keyness in Text", pp.43~48 (2011), John Benjamins
- Scott, M., (2016), Lexical analysis software
- 심우진, "Use of Discourse Markers on the English Speaking Tests: Focusing on the Deixis and Cohesive Devices", 현대영어영문학, 58(3), pp.373~401 (2014), 한국현대영어영문학회
- 신동광, "어휘학습을 위한 언어 입력의 제공원으로서 원어민, 비원어민 교사, 교재 비교 연구", Foreign Languages Education, 22(4), pp.181~200 (2015), 한국외국어교육학회
- Trillo, J., "The pragmatic fossilization of discourse markers in non-native speakers of English", Journal of Pragmatics, 34(6), pp.769~784 (2002)
- Vickov, G., "Discourse markers in non-native EFL Teacher talk", Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7, pp.649~671 (2017)
- 윤현숙, "학습자 언어 수준에 따른 외국어 작문에서의 어휘다발 사용에 관한 연구", 외국어교육연구, 31(1), pp.35~58 (2017), 외국어교육연구소[DOI]