김태준의 『조선한문학사(朝鮮漢文學史)』의 인용 문헌 활용 양상 연구

Abstract

This paper organizes the literatures cited in 『A History of Chosŏn Classical Chinese Literature』 of Kim T’ae-jun, by era, which is the first book to diachronically systematize the historical flow of Sino-Korean literature and has been provided as a basic genealogy of Sino-Korean literature research and examines the way of utilizing the literatures and the characteristics of narrative style. Previously, there was no attempt to establish a system for the history of Sino-Korean literature by academia, the work of collecting and examining data and describing it as a history of literature was based on an empirical attitude. In accepting the existing data, it went through the work of self-verification, other data were supplemented as occasion demands. For example, in setting the starting point of Sino-Korean literature, the author's origin and the reality of the work are described based on an empirical attitude. In addition, evaluation of China played a major role. This is for the objectivity of the evaluation, and it does not mean that he did not trust the evaluation of domestic writers. Because of the perceptive of Kim T’ae-jun, which regarded Sino-Korean literature as Chinese literature, evaluation in China was preferred rather than domestic evaluation. Lastly, Kim T’ae-jun described, by citing existing reviews, the history of literature in the way that he speaks for his opinion. He utilized Sin Wi’s quatrain, which had have a suggestive character throughout the history of literature, and intactly applied his viewpoint of the history of literature on the Sino-Korean literature. At the same time, it is also confirmed that he repeated his mistakes as they are. 『A History of Chosŏn Classical Chinese Literature』 of Kim T’ae-jun was inherently inevitable to have a bias against the narrative of the history of Sino-Korean literature. Because he had focused on wheter or not it has the reputation in China, which was caused by the viewpoint of treating Chosŏn Classical Chinese Literature as a remote region’s literature, and mainly accepted the centralized writers’ appraisal, especially Sin Wi’s, etc. Even so, in the narrative of the history of Sino-Korean literature, the pioneering attempt to introduce a modern academic attitude by showing an empirical attitude based on literature cannot be underestimated.