An Apology for Love in George Eliot’s The Lifted Veil
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Long regarded an aberration in George Eliot’s realist canon, The Lifted Veil has increasingly been reconsidered in light of Eliot’s moral aesthetic. Latimer’s clairvoyance, in concert with his position as the only first-person protagonist-artist in Eliot’s oeuvre, led to compelling analyses of the ways in which the novella’s glaring depiction of the protagonist’s failed sympathy betrays Eliot’s aesthetic dilemma. Departing from the prevailing critical tendency to view Latimer as foremost a rhetorical device for grappling with Eliot’s aesthetics of sympathy, this essay construes the novella’s thematization of sympathy in terms of Latimer’s characterological embodiment. A close-up of Latimer as a character reveals the extent to which he becomes subject to the dehumanizing discourse which hinders sympathy. Yet beyond its critique of the habits of thought that debilitate the self’s ethical relation with the other, The Lifted Veil engages the reader in the moral force of the rare moments in which the subject works around egoistic impulses to bring about a sympathetic encounter. While Latimer’s use of the term “intoxicate” betrays the fallibility of his claims for passivity in forming sympathy, the novella emphasizes, through these moments, the subject’s agency in the openness to the possibility of sympathy as being crucial to forming a responsive fellow feeling.
Abstract
Long regarded an aberration in George Eliot’s realist canon, The Lifted Veil has increasingly been reconsidered in light of Eliot’s moral aesthetic. Latimer’s clairvoyance, in concert with his position as the only first-person protagonist-artist in Eliot’s oeuvre, led to compelling analyses of the ways in which the novella’s glaring depiction of the protagonist’s failed sympathy betrays Eliot’s aesthetic dilemma. Departing from the prevailing critical tendency to view Latimer as foremost a rhetorical device for grappling with Eliot’s aesthetics of sympathy, this essay construes the novella’s thematization of sympathy in terms of Latimer’s characterological embodiment. A close-up of Latimer as a character reveals the extent to which he becomes subject to the dehumanizing discourse which hinders sympathy. Yet beyond its critique of the habits of thought that debilitate the self’s ethical relation with the other, The Lifted Veil engages the reader in the moral force of the rare moments in which the subject works around egoistic impulses to bring about a sympathetic encounter. While Latimer’s use of the term “intoxicate” betrays the fallibility of his claims for passivity in forming sympathy, the novella emphasizes, through these moments, the subject’s agency in the openness to the possibility of sympathy as being crucial to forming a responsive fellow feeling.
참고문헌 (24)
- Albrecht, Thomas, "Sympathy and Telepathy: The Problem of Ethics in George Eliot’s The Lifted Veil", ELH, 73(2), pp.437~463 (2006)
- Carlson, Michael, "Famished Tigress: Sympathy and the Other in George Eliot’s Fiction", George Eliot-George Henry Lewes Studies, 58, pp.59 (2010), 61~76
- Eagleton, Terry, "Power and Knowledge in ‘The Lifted Veil’", Literature and History, 9(1), pp.52~61 (1983)
- Eliot, George, "The Lifted Veil and Brother Jacob", pp.1~43 (2009), Oxford UP
- Eliot, George, "Selected Essays, Poems and Other Writings", pp.107~139 (1990), Penguin
- Flint, Kate, "Blood, Bodies, and The Lifted Veil", Nineteenth-Century Literature, 51(4), pp.455~473 (1997)
- Galvan, Jill, "The Narrator as Medium in George Eliot’s ‘The Lifted Veil’", Victorian Studies, 48(2), pp.240~248 (2006)
- Gilbert, Sandra, "The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination" (1979), Yale UP
- Graver, Suzanne, "George Eliot and Community; A Study in Social Theory and Fictional Form" (1984), U of California P
- Gray, B. M., "Pseudoscience and George Eliot’s ‘The Lifted Veil’", Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 36(4), pp.407~423 (1982)
- Greiner, Rae, "Sympathetic Realism in Nineteenth-Century British Fiction" (2012), Johns Hopkins UP
- Griffin, Cristina R., "George Eliot’s Feuerbach: Senses, Sympathy, Omniscience, and Secularism", ELH, 84(2), pp.475~502 (2017)
- Henry, Nancy, "The Cambridge Introduction to George Eliot" (2008), Cambridge UP
- "Intoxicate, n.3a" (2021)[URL]
- "Intoxicate, n.3b" (2021)[URL]
- "The Wimp Who Knew Too Much" (1986)[URL]
- Price, Cheryl Blake, "Poison, Sensation, and Secrets in ‘The Lifted Veil’", Victorian Review, 36(1), pp.203~216 (2010)
- Small, Helen, "The Lifted Veil and Brother Jacob", pp.88~104 (2009), Oxford UP
- Small, Helen, "The Lifted Veil and Brother Jacob", pp.9~38 (2009), Oxford UP
- Tennov, Dorothy, "Love and Limerence: The Experience of Being in Love" (1980), Stein and Day
- Viera, Carroll, "‘The Lifted Veil’ and George Eliot’s Early Aesthetic", Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900, 24(4), pp.749~767 (1984)
- Wallace, Anne D., "‘Vague Capricious Memories’: ‘The Lifted Veil’s Challenge to Wordsworthian Poetics", The George Eliot, George Henry-Lewes Newsletter, 18, pp.19 (1991), 31~45
- Wilt, Judith, "Ghosts of the Gothic: Austen, Eliot, and Lawrence" (1980), Princeton UP
- Wood, Jane, "Scientific Rationality and Fanciful Fiction: Gendered Discourse in The Lifted Veil", Women’s Writing, 3(2), pp.161~176 (1996)