應神記의 構想 -宇遅能和紀郎子와 大雀命의 자리매김-
The Concept of Oujinki -The state of Ujinowakiiratsuko and Osazakinomikoto-
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the "Kojiki", the big change to the method of the succession to the Imperial Throne is seenbetween 2nd and 3rd volume. That is, two different methods of succession between brothers and paternalsuccession. Ujinowakiiratsuko passes away suddenly, without acceding to the throne, thoughcommissioned the next generation Emperor from Oujin. Although this structure is the same also as the"KiKi" on the whole, there are the four differences. First, although birth of Ujinowakiiratsuko is told inthe column of Emperor Oujin by the marriage in connection with god, there is nothing to the"Nihonshoki." Although it is shown to the second by the "Nihonshoki" that he mastered learning ofConfucianism, such description is not visible to the "Kojiki". In the "Nihonshoki", he commit suicide forOsazakinomikoto. However, in the "Kojiki", it is to have passed away suddenly in the meantime. Finally,although his younger sister is Emperor Nintoku's Empress in the "Nihonshoki", it is not related with the"Kojiki" to Nintoku, but gives an account as having become as single by it. It seems that suchdifferences are the problems in connection with the difference in the meaning which Ujinowaki andOsazaki in the "KiKi" bear. In the context of the "Kojiki", Ujinowakiiratsuko which looks external with ahero is only a supporting player in fact, and, therefore, the back always shows the high evaluation toOsazaki. Putting the above together, in the "Kojiki", Osazaki is positioned as an existence equipped withConfucian thought at the same time it receives a mythological guarantee. In short, the person imagewhich has these two requirements was told to the end of the 2nd volume. And Nintoku which had thesetwo requirements is considered that becoming the ideal Emperor of the third volume is shown.
Abstract
In the "Kojiki", the big change to the method of the succession to the Imperial Throne is seenbetween 2nd and 3rd volume. That is, two different methods of succession between brothers and paternalsuccession. Ujinowakiiratsuko passes away suddenly, without acceding to the throne, thoughcommissioned the next generation Emperor from Oujin. Although this structure is the same also as the"KiKi" on the whole, there are the four differences. First, although birth of Ujinowakiiratsuko is told inthe column of Emperor Oujin by the marriage in connection with god, there is nothing to the"Nihonshoki." Although it is shown to the second by the "Nihonshoki" that he mastered learning ofConfucianism, such description is not visible to the "Kojiki". In the "Nihonshoki", he commit suicide forOsazakinomikoto. However, in the "Kojiki", it is to have passed away suddenly in the meantime. Finally,although his younger sister is Emperor Nintoku's Empress in the "Nihonshoki", it is not related with the"Kojiki" to Nintoku, but gives an account as having become as single by it. It seems that suchdifferences are the problems in connection with the difference in the meaning which Ujinowaki andOsazaki in the "KiKi" bear. In the context of the "Kojiki", Ujinowakiiratsuko which looks external with ahero is only a supporting player in fact, and, therefore, the back always shows the high evaluation toOsazaki. Putting the above together, in the "Kojiki", Osazaki is positioned as an existence equipped withConfucian thought at the same time it receives a mythological guarantee. In short, the person imagewhich has these two requirements was told to the end of the 2nd volume. And Nintoku which had thesetwo requirements is considered that becoming the ideal Emperor of the third volume is shown.
참고문헌 (26)
- 上山春平, "神々の体系", pp.165~ (1972), 中央公論社
- 菅野雅雄, "古事記論叢V構造(著作集 第五巻)" (2004), おうふう
- 坂本勝, "古事記の構想" (1994), 高科書店
- 神田秀夫, "古事記の構造", pp.128~130 (1959), 明治書院
- 吉井巌, "天皇の系譜と神話(三)", pp.59~62 (1992), 塙書房
- "日本書紀①" (1994), 小學館
- "古事記" (1997), 小学館
- 岸俊男, "日本古代政治史研究" (1966), 塙書房
- 西宮一民, "古事記", pp.189~ (1979), 新朝社
- 荻原千鶴, "日本古代の神話と文学", pp.289~ (1998), 塙書房
- 金祥圭, "古事記の構想-応神の倭名をめぐって-", 日本語文学, 11 (2000)
- 古事記伝, "本居宣長全集第十巻", pp.114~115 (1968), 筑摩書房
- 古事記伝, "本居宣長全集第十一巻", pp.476~ (1969), 筑摩書房
- 戸谷高明, "『日の皇子』と『天の日継』─『日』の思想と表現をめぐって─", 古代文学, 11 (1971)
- 布施浩之, "応神記・大雀命皇位繼承論─古事記中巻から下巻への意識─", 日本文学論究, 53 (1994)
- 神野志隆光, "古事記の天皇", pp.272~273 (1994), 高科書店
- 坂橋隆司, "宇遅の和紀郎子物語考─末子相続を通して─", 国学院大学短期大学紀要, 11 (1968)
- 中川ゆかり, "上代散文その表現の試み", pp.207~ (2009), 塙書房
- 尾畑喜一郎, "大山守命物語", 芸能, 2(7) (1960)
- 矢内啓一郎, "宇遅能和紀郎子の位置", 古代研究, 35 (2002)
- 都倉義孝, "古事記古代王権の語りの仕組み", pp.220~221 (1995), 有精堂
- 青木周平, "古代文学の歌と説話", pp.107~ (2000), 若草書房
- 冨士原伸宏, "髪長比売の婚姻-<喚上型>の視点を通して-", 國學院雑誌, 96(8,9) (1995)
- 諸橋轍次, "大漢和辞典 巻四", pp.698~ (1986), 大修館書店
- 藤沢友祥, "石之日売命の嫉妬-『嫉妬』による排除-", 国文学研究, 161 (2010)
- 藤沢友祥, "宇遅能和紀郎子ー下巻への布石ー", 古代研究, 45 (2012)
