「文学」の題材としての「性欲」 -『平凡』における「文学」の否定の意味-
Sexual Desire as a Literary Subject : Meaning Behind the Literary Denial in 'Heibon'
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Around 40 years into the Meiji era, the Naturalism acquired the privilege to express the truth of life through sexual desire, and Futabatei Shimei's Heibon was published during this period of time. Although the naturalistic theory of sexual desire had been developed through the book of sexology since the early days of the Meiji era, sex and sexual desire had often been associated with the marriage system in order to control and maintain social order. Nevertheless, with the development of instinctivism around 30 years into the Meiji era, the idea of fulfilling human desire became very apparent and natural. This naturally led the literary society to actively delineate the subject of sexual desire through the media, and eventually through literature. Taking this historical time period into consideration, this paper sheds new light on the relationship between sexual desire and literature that are portrayed in Heibon, and considers this relationship as the subject of analysis to question the meaning behind the existence of this particular literature. In particular, Heibon portrays sexual desire as a concept of neuter gender, and unlike realist and Naturalism at the time, which differentiated love in physical and mental sense, it presents a new concept of how the different elements in the lives of men and women create friction and cause Ikioi(勢) to occur, regardless of each gender's respective sexual desire. This new gender relationship was developed to criticize and challenge the existing relationship between sexual desire and literature that were commonly portrayed in the older literatures, and it also presents a new literary paradigm for sexual desire by breaking away from the bisection of sexual desire and love physical and mental sense.
Abstract
Around 40 years into the Meiji era, the Naturalism acquired the privilege to express the truth of life through sexual desire, and Futabatei Shimei's Heibon was published during this period of time. Although the naturalistic theory of sexual desire had been developed through the book of sexology since the early days of the Meiji era, sex and sexual desire had often been associated with the marriage system in order to control and maintain social order. Nevertheless, with the development of instinctivism around 30 years into the Meiji era, the idea of fulfilling human desire became very apparent and natural. This naturally led the literary society to actively delineate the subject of sexual desire through the media, and eventually through literature. Taking this historical time period into consideration, this paper sheds new light on the relationship between sexual desire and literature that are portrayed in Heibon, and considers this relationship as the subject of analysis to question the meaning behind the existence of this particular literature. In particular, Heibon portrays sexual desire as a concept of neuter gender, and unlike realist and Naturalism at the time, which differentiated love in physical and mental sense, it presents a new concept of how the different elements in the lives of men and women create friction and cause Ikioi(勢) to occur, regardless of each gender's respective sexual desire. This new gender relationship was developed to criticize and challenge the existing relationship between sexual desire and literature that were commonly portrayed in the older literatures, and it also presents a new literary paradigm for sexual desire by breaking away from the bisection of sexual desire and love physical and mental sense.
참고문헌 (28)
- 稲垣達郎, "『平凡』について", 文学, 22(10), pp.23~ (1954), 岩波書店
- 稲垣達郎, "明治文学全集16", pp.74~ (1969), 筑摩書房
- 小木新造, "日本近代思想大系23", pp.505~550 (1990), 岩波書店
- 小栗風葉, "明治大正文学全集17", pp.1~342 (1928), 春陽堂
- 川副国基, "日本近代文学大系57", pp.175~ (1972), 角川書店
- クラフト, "色情狂編", pp.1~221 (1894), 法医学会
- 玉水生, "『青春』合評", 早稲田文学, 16, pp.88~90 (1907), 東京堂
- 紅野敏郎, "相馬御風著作集 別巻1", pp.341~345 (1981), 名著刊行会
- 小杉天, "明治大正文学全集16", pp.1~300 (1930), 春陽堂
- 斎藤光, "クラフト=エビングの『性的精神病質』とその内容の移入初期史", 京都精華大学紀要, 10, pp.154~177 (1996), 京都精華大学
- 斎藤光, "性科学·性教育編 解説", 性と生殖の人権問題資料集成, 27, pp.1~8 (2000), 不二出版
- 佐伯順子, "岩波人文書セレクション 「色」と「愛」の比較文学史", pp.65~102 (2010), 岩波書店
- 十川信介, "増補 二葉亭四迷論", pp.252~ (1984), 筑摩書房
- 十川信介, "二葉亭四迷全集 第一巻", pp.415~533 (1984), 筑摩書房
- 十川信介, "二葉亭四迷全集 第四巻", pp.246~250 (1985), 筑摩書房
- 永井良和, "探偵の社会史1 尾行者たちの街角", pp.11~54 (2000), 世織書房
- 原真男, "色情と青年", pp.1~202 (1906), 丸山舎書籍部
- 原久一郎訳, "トルストイ全集47 性欲論", pp.75~90 (1955), 講談社
- 平石典子, "「堕落」する女学生ー「女学生神話」を巡る考察(二)ー", 文芸言語研究文芸篇, 40, pp.69~ (2001), 筑波大学文芸·言語学系
- 平石典子, "ロマンテック·ラブと女性表象ー「新しい女」を巡ってー", 比較文学研究, 82, pp.62~ (2003), 東大比較文学会
- 二葉亭四迷, "片恋", pp.263~ (1896), 春陽堂
- フォーレル, "性欲倫理", pp.1~72 (1910), 雑誌之雑誌社
- 本田和子, "女学生の系譜·増補版ー彩色される明治―", pp.129~ (2012), 青弓社
- 光石亜由美, "<性>的現象としての文学ー性欲描写論争と田山花袋「蒲団」ー", 日本文学, 48(6), pp.28~38 (1999), 日本文学協会
- 村上孝之, "『クロイツェル· ソナタ』と『平凡』ーキリスト教的性愛観への反撃ー", スラヴ研究, 38, pp.1~16 (1991), 北海道大学
- 森鴎, "月草", pp.1~ (1896), 春陽堂
- 吉田精一, "明治文学全集67", pp.71~101 (1968), 筑摩書房
- 吉田精一, "明治期Ⅲ", pp.430~432 (1972), 角川書店
