고대 일본에서 본 한국의 태실문화
The Japanese Language and Literature Association of Daehan
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
For the purpose of this article, a comparative research on placenta chambers(Taesil) between Korea and Japan. Ancient Japanese placenta chambers can be divided into two different types. The first ones are God’s placenta chambers such as Amaterasu and Susanoo. The second ones are belong to humans that it can also divided into shrine types(Oobase, Oujin, Keitai, Machizane, Yositsune, Kamegawa) and tumulus types(Keitai, Yositsune). Most of the placenta chambers were belong to imperial family, but it wasn’t meant to be imperial’s exclusive. The ancient Japanese placenta chambers can be explained in these words. First, The place was fixed upon the birthplace. Second, After constructing placenta chamber, a rock or a tree was planted. Third, When placenta was defied, it was related with birth and nurture and established as a folk beliefs. Lastly, When it developed into folk beliefs, shrine was built. Otherwise, tumulus was built to preserve placenta chamber. These characteristic of Japanese placenta chambers are coincide in every detail with the Ancient Korean placenta chambers. Therefore, Ancient Korean and Japanese placenta chambers are considered as same cultural sphere. But, By comparing with Joseon royal placenta chamber, there are some differences are found as follows. Placenta chamber was a exclusive to the Joseon royal families. The place was not belongs to the birth place, it was determine by the geomantic principles and constructed with stone crypt. And it never turns into folk beliefs. Comparing with earlier type of placenta chamber such as Kim Yu shin’s placenta chamber it was a big shift.
Abstract
For the purpose of this article, a comparative research on placenta chambers(Taesil) between Korea and Japan. Ancient Japanese placenta chambers can be divided into two different types. The first ones are God’s placenta chambers such as Amaterasu and Susanoo. The second ones are belong to humans that it can also divided into shrine types(Oobase, Oujin, Keitai, Machizane, Yositsune, Kamegawa) and tumulus types(Keitai, Yositsune). Most of the placenta chambers were belong to imperial family, but it wasn’t meant to be imperial’s exclusive. The ancient Japanese placenta chambers can be explained in these words. First, The place was fixed upon the birthplace. Second, After constructing placenta chamber, a rock or a tree was planted. Third, When placenta was defied, it was related with birth and nurture and established as a folk beliefs. Lastly, When it developed into folk beliefs, shrine was built. Otherwise, tumulus was built to preserve placenta chamber. These characteristic of Japanese placenta chambers are coincide in every detail with the Ancient Korean placenta chambers. Therefore, Ancient Korean and Japanese placenta chambers are considered as same cultural sphere. But, By comparing with Joseon royal placenta chamber, there are some differences are found as follows. Placenta chamber was a exclusive to the Joseon royal families. The place was not belongs to the birth place, it was determine by the geomantic principles and constructed with stone crypt. And it never turns into folk beliefs. Comparing with earlier type of placenta chamber such as Kim Yu shin’s placenta chamber it was a big shift.
참고문헌 (12)
- 김지영, "조선시대 출산과 왕실의 ‘장태의례(藏胎儀禮)’ -문화적 실천양상과 그 의미-", 역사와 세계, 45, pp.39~76 (2014), 효원사학회
- 김호, "조선왕실의 장태의식과 관련 의궤", 한국학보, 111, pp.168~ (2003), 일지사
- 민병삼, "태실의 풍수적 생명사상 연구", 영남학, (31), pp.221~269 (2016), 영남문화연구원[DOI]
- 심현용, "조선시대 태실의 입지에 대한 재검토", 대구사학, 118, pp.37~75 (2015), 대구사학회[DOI]
- 이문건, "양아록", pp.20~21 (1997), 태학사
- 홍성익, "조선시대 胎室의 역사고고학적 연구", 영남학, (27), pp.7~51 (2015), 영남문화연구원[DOI]
- 조현영, "별고을 성주, 생명을 품다", pp.250~ (2015), 성주군 경북대 영남문화연구원
- 최남선, "조선의 신화와 일본의 신화", 육당 최남선전집, 5, pp.36~37 (1951), 현암사
- 鐘方正樹, "胞衣を納むる位置と方角", 奈良市埋蔵文化財調査センター紀要, pp.12~ (1989), 奈良市教育委員会
- 中村禎里, "胞衣の生命", pp.19~20 (1999), 海鳴社
- 蒲田春樹, "魅惑の京都ふしぎ発見", pp.96~ (2015), PHP研究所
- 山口麻太郞, "出産と村のモノイミ", 民間伝承, 10(2)통권 : 100, pp.59~60 (1944), 民間伝承の会