본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

使役文の統語構造と教え方 -韓国語との対照研究の立場から-

Syntactic structure and how to teach Japanese causative sentences judging from the viewpoint of the contrast study with Korean

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

The Japanese causative is formed by a regular method, but the Korean causative is unproductive to have the verb limitation. The Japanese causative sentence is used syntactically when I watch the component of the sentence, but the Korean causative sentence varies according to the characteristic of the causative, and the Korean causative sentence is used by the side that is more semantic than the syntactic side. When TEMORAU sentence and a causative sentence are used in the same meaning, the causative sentence does not respect the will of the doer, but the TEMORAU sentence respects the will of the doer. The causative passive sentence is the syntactic structure that two auxiliary verbs are close together in one root of a word as for Japanese at the same time, but as for Korean, passive causativization is impossible of many cases. When you teach a Korean Japanese causative sentence, the teacher is aware of these matters and should face education. 1) I let you learn the syntactic structure of an element constituting a causative sentence well. 2) The method to make a causative lets you learn it in conjunction with NAI form.. 3) I let you recognize it who lets you do an act who does an act. 4) The causative sentence of the intransitive verb is concluded from two components, but the causative sentence of the transitive verb is concluded from three components. Therefore, I learn it from the causative sentence of the intransitive verb in turn. 5) The (SA)SETE KUDASAI expression is used when I express the feeling that the doer wants to do. However, The (SA)SERARERU expression is used when I express the unpleasant feeling of the doer of the unpleasant situation. Therefore, I emphasize this difference, and it is necessary to let you learn it. 6) The causative sentence is expression representing the situations of the causa

Abstract

The Japanese causative is formed by a regular method, but the Korean causative is unproductive to have the verb limitation. The Japanese causative sentence is used syntactically when I watch the component of the sentence, but the Korean causative sentence varies according to the characteristic of the causative, and the Korean causative sentence is used by the side that is more semantic than the syntactic side. When TEMORAU sentence and a causative sentence are used in the same meaning, the causative sentence does not respect the will of the doer, but the TEMORAU sentence respects the will of the doer. The causative passive sentence is the syntactic structure that two auxiliary verbs are close together in one root of a word as for Japanese at the same time, but as for Korean, passive causativization is impossible of many cases. When you teach a Korean Japanese causative sentence, the teacher is aware of these matters and should face education. 1) I let you learn the syntactic structure of an element constituting a causative sentence well. 2) The method to make a causative lets you learn it in conjunction with NAI form.. 3) I let you recognize it who lets you do an act who does an act. 4) The causative sentence of the intransitive verb is concluded from two components, but the causative sentence of the transitive verb is concluded from three components. Therefore, I learn it from the causative sentence of the intransitive verb in turn. 5) The (SA)SETE KUDASAI expression is used when I express the feeling that the doer wants to do. However, The (SA)SERARERU expression is used when I express the unpleasant feeling of the doer of the unpleasant situation. Therefore, I emphasize this difference, and it is necessary to let you learn it. 6) The causative sentence is expression representing the situations of the causa

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 김기혁, "타동의 자동 함축과 사동과 피동", 한국어학, 46, pp.145~173 (2010), 한국어학회
  2. 김윤신, "사동?피동 동형동사의 논항교체 양상과 의미해석", 한국어 의미학, 21, pp.51~73 (2006), 한국어의미학회
  3. 庵 功雄, "新しい日本語学入門", pp.98~139 (2001), スリーエーネットワーク
  4. 市川保子, "初級日本語文法と教え方のポイント", pp.257~298 (2005), スリーエーネットワーク
  5. 林憲燦, "日韓使役文の統語的·意味的特徵と日本語敎育への提案", 日本文化學報, (30), pp.45~67 (2006), 한국일본문화학회
  6. 임헌찬, "日本語使役と韓国語使役の条件と類型", 일어일문학, (52), pp.5~26 (2011), 대한일어일문학회
  7. 定延利之, "日本語のヴォイスと他動性", pp.123~148 (1991), くろしお出版
  8. スリーエーネットワーク, "みんなの日本語 Pre-Intermediate Course 2", pp.128~139 (2001), 시사일본어사
  9. 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味Ⅰ", pp.285~302 (1982), くろしお出版
  10. 東京外国語大学留学生日本語教育センター, "実力日本語(下)" (2000), 凡人社
  11. 早津恵美子, "朝倉日本語講座6 文法Ⅱ", pp.105~120 (2004), 朝倉書店
  12. 文化外国語専門学校 日本語課, "新文化日本語2", pp.230~271 (2000), 시사일본어사
  13. 森田良行, "日本語文法の発想", pp.181~232 (2002), ひつじ書房
  14. 森山卓郎, "ここからはじまる日本語文法", pp.57~80 (2000), ひつじ書房
  15. Comrie, B, "Language Universals and Linguistic Typology" (1989), The University of Chicago Press
  16. Shibatani, M, "Syntax and Semantics 6", pp.1~40 (1976), Academic Press
  17. Washio, R., "Interpreting Voice: A case Study in Lexical Semantics" (1995), kaitakusha

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (31건)