본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Secondary English Teachers’ Views on Flipped Teaching: A Qualitative Study on Reasons, Difficulties, and Outcomes of Flipping

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Flipped teaching (FT) has drawn a great deal of interests among teachers since Bergmann and Sams’ work was introduced in the media in Korea in 2013 (Lim, 2017). Accordingly, many studies reported FT promotes learners’ active participation and collaborative interaction in class compared to traditional ones (e.g., Lee & Min, 2016; Murphy, Chang & Suaray, 2016; Shin, Ha & Lee, 2016). However, the majority of these studies are done quantitatively and examined instructors’ and/or learners‘ perceptions at elementary and college levels (Cho & Lee, 2018). In fact, the lack of research and qualitative studies on FT in secondary school contexts is well noted (e.g., Cheng, Hwang & Lai, 2022; Park & Kim, 2022; Lee, Lee & Shin, 2020; Cho & Lee, 2018; Kim & Shin, 2016), which is also true of English teaching (Kim & Kim, 2019). Therefore, this study examined 6 secondary English teachers' views on FT. More specifically, based on semi-structured interview data, this study adopted coding analyses in Grounded Theory (Corbin & Strauss, 1990) to investigate the teachers’ reasons, difficulties, key characteristics, and outcomes of FT. The teachers began flipping because of dissatisfaction with lecture-oriented teaching, student low participation, and availability of instructional software and technology in preparing for and conducting FT. Despite the initial difficulties in flipping due to a large class size, excessive workload, and hostility towards changes, they reported there were more student-centered activities and active engagements while their role was changed into ‘monitors’ lecturers in class. They suggested that both teachers and students adapt themselves to FT. That is, teachers should be prepared to deal with ‘trials and errors’ while students should realize the importance of getting with the flow by previewing videos or lesson contents in order to actively participate in flipped class.

Abstract

Flipped teaching (FT) has drawn a great deal of interests among teachers since Bergmann and Sams’ work was introduced in the media in Korea in 2013 (Lim, 2017). Accordingly, many studies reported FT promotes learners’ active participation and collaborative interaction in class compared to traditional ones (e.g., Lee & Min, 2016; Murphy, Chang & Suaray, 2016; Shin, Ha & Lee, 2016). However, the majority of these studies are done quantitatively and examined instructors’ and/or learners‘ perceptions at elementary and college levels (Cho & Lee, 2018). In fact, the lack of research and qualitative studies on FT in secondary school contexts is well noted (e.g., Cheng, Hwang & Lai, 2022; Park & Kim, 2022; Lee, Lee & Shin, 2020; Cho & Lee, 2018; Kim & Shin, 2016), which is also true of English teaching (Kim & Kim, 2019). Therefore, this study examined 6 secondary English teachers' views on FT. More specifically, based on semi-structured interview data, this study adopted coding analyses in Grounded Theory (Corbin & Strauss, 1990) to investigate the teachers’ reasons, difficulties, key characteristics, and outcomes of FT. The teachers began flipping because of dissatisfaction with lecture-oriented teaching, student low participation, and availability of instructional software and technology in preparing for and conducting FT. Despite the initial difficulties in flipping due to a large class size, excessive workload, and hostility towards changes, they reported there were more student-centered activities and active engagements while their role was changed into ‘monitors’ lecturers in class. They suggested that both teachers and students adapt themselves to FT. That is, teachers should be prepared to deal with ‘trials and errors’ while students should realize the importance of getting with the flow by previewing videos or lesson contents in order to actively participate in flipped class.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Ahmad, D., "Exploring student achievement and perceptions in an online flipped grammar course", Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(3), pp.639~665 (2021)
  2. Bergmann, J., "Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day" (2012), International Society for Technology in Education
  3. Bredow, C. A., "To flip or not to flip? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of flipped learning in higher education", Review of Educational Research, 91(6), pp.878~918 (2021)
  4. 채윤정, "거꾸로 수업을 마주한 과학교사들의 갈등에 관한 질적 사례연구", 중등교육연구, 66(1), pp.359~395 (2018), 사범대학부속중등교육연구소[DOI]
  5. Chellapan, L., "To flip or not to flip, that's the question: Findings from an exploratory study into factors that may influence tertiary teachers to consider a flipped classroom model", Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 22(1), pp.6~21 (2018)
  6. Cheng, S., "Critical research advancements of flipped learning : A review of the top 100 highly cited papers", Interactive Learning Environments, 30(9), pp.1751~1767 (2022)
  7. 조보람, "국내 플립러닝의 학습효과에 관한 메타분석", 디지털융복합연구, 16(3), pp.59~73 (2018), 한국디지털정책학회[DOI]
  8. Corbin, J., "Grounded theory research : Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria", Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), pp.3~22 (1990)
  9. Goo, J. Y., "A case study on the application of a flipped English class in high school", master’s, pp.2017
  10. 홍기칠, "거꾸로 교실(Flipped Classroom)의 실행에 대한 비평적 분석", 교육방법연구, 28(1), pp.125~149 (2016), 한국교육방법학회[DOI]
  11. Hung, H., "Design-based research : Redesign of an English language course using a flipped classroom approach", TESOL Quarterly, 51(1), pp.180~192 (2017)
  12. Jeon, J. S., "An investigation of the perceptions and difficulties experienced by high school English teachers in flipped learning", master’s, pp.2018
  13. 김혜미, "블렌디드러닝과 플립러닝을 활용한 영어교육연구의 효과 비교를 위한 메타분석", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 19(21), pp.241~258 (2019), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
  14. Kim, J. S., "The effect of flipped learning in grammar education: Focused on the teaching part of speech to 7th grade students", The Journal of Korean Arts Education Research, 30, pp.47~69 (2017)
  15. 김민경, "거꾸로 교실수업이 중학교 영어 학습자의 학업성취도와 정의적 영역에 미치는 영향", 중등교육연구, 64(2), pp.289~314 (2016), 사범대학부속중등교육연구소[DOI]
  16. 김영선, "Flipped Learning 활용 주제중심 수업과 학업성취도의 관계", 예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지, 6(4), pp.289~297 (2016), 사단법인 인문사회과학기술융합학회[DOI]
  17. Lee, G., "Flipped learning in the English as a foreign language classroom: Outcomes and perceptions", TESOL Quarterly, 52(1), pp.62~84 (2018)
  18. 이혜옥, "거꾸로 교실 수업에 대한 중등 영어 교사 인식 조사 연구", 중등영어교육, 9(3), pp.99~122 (2016), 한국중등영어교육학회
  19. 이강호, "고등학교 영어 학습에서의 거꾸로 학습(Flipped Learning)의 실험연구: 학업 성취도, 태도 및 흥미도를 중심으로", 영어학연구, 26(2), pp.71~89 (2020), 한국영어학학회[DOI]
  20. Lee, M., "Flipped classroom as an alternative future class model? Implications of south Korea's social experiment", Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(3), pp.837~857 (2018)
  21. 이사라, "영어 교과 거꾸로 수업에서 나타나는 대학생들의 자기주도적 학습태도 변화", Foreign Languages Education, 25(3), pp.127~159 (2018), 한국외국어교육학회[DOI]
  22. 이영은, "대학 영문법 수업에서의 거꾸로 수업 효과연구", 외국어교육연구, 37(3), pp.1~25 (2023), 외국어교육연구소[DOI]
  23. 임성희, "Teachers Empowering Teachers in an Online Community of Practice: A Case Study of Korean EFL Teachers’ Learning to Teach Flipped Classroom on NAVER BAND", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 20(1), pp.109~143 (2017), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]
  24. Murphy, J., "Student performance and attitudes in a collaborative and flipped linear algebra course", International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(5), pp.653~673 (2016)
  25. 남혜원, "고등 수학 교수법에 거꾸로 학습을 활용한 사례 연구", 교육문화연구, 25(4), pp.647~661 (2019), 교육연구소[DOI]
  26. 박인옥, "중학교 사회과 거꾸로 교실 수업에 대한 학생들의 인식 조사", 교육문화연구, 24(1), pp.289~304 (2018), 교육연구소[DOI]
  27. 박명호, "거꾸로 수업이 고등학생 영어 읽기 능력에 미치는 영향", 언어과학, 29(1), pp.79~96 (2022), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
  28. Shin, S. K., ""It cannot be done alone" : The socialization of novice English teachers in South Korea", TESOL Quarterly, 46(3), pp.542~567 (2012)
  29. 신영준, "거꾸로 수업(Flipped Learning)에서 과학 교사들이 겪는 인식과 어려움 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 36(1), pp.159~166 (2016), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  30. 서미옥, "플립드 러닝의 효과성에 대한 메타분석", 교육공학연구, 32(4), pp.707~741 (2016), 한국교육공학회[DOI]
  31. 성기완, "A Case Study on a Flipped Classroom in an EFL Content Course", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 18(2), pp.159~187 (2015), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]
  32. Turan, Z., "Flipped classroom in English language teaching: A systematic review", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5-6), pp.590~606 (2020)
  33. Vitta, J. P., "The flipped classroom in second language learning : A meta-analysis", Language Teaching Research, 27(5), pp.1268~1292 (2023)
  34. 임은희, "영어 어휘 학습에서의 거꾸로 교실 적용가능성 탐색", Foreign Languages Education, 23(4), pp.113~138 (2016), 한국외국어교육학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)