본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국과 일본의 대학 교양교육에 관한 대조연구 ― 대학생의 교양교육에 관한 인식 실태조사를 중심으로 ―

A Comparative Study on Liberal Arts Education in Korea and Japan: A Study on the Cognition Survey of College Students on the Liberal Arts Education

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

The importance of liberal arts education in college education is emphasized recently. In order to cultivate creative talents in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the direction of restructuring of liberal arts education should be examined. This study started from this consciousness. The statistical analysis program was analyzed using IBM SPSS 22.0. The survey subjects were 194 college students in Korea. And 232 college students in Japan. The results of the analysis are as follows. In both countries, the satisfaction of teachers (professors, lecturers) and active participation in class are high, but the satisfaction of university support is low and the university authorities need to pay more attention to liberal arts education. In the case of Japan, the satisfaction level of the textbooks is low. In both countries, the degree of questioning in the liberal arts class is very low (2.66 in Korea, 2.04 in Japan). Efforts should be made so that classes can be made in 'Active Learning' so that liberal arts classes can be activated. The ratio of liberal arts education in college education is 35 out of 130 in Korea. Japan accounts for 45 out of 124 credits. In both Korea and Japan, cooperative learning and micro󰠏teaching in the liberal arts education were at an average level (3.02 in Japan, 3.06 in Japan, 3.16 in Korea, 3.25 in Korea), and the level of convergence education is very low. In particular, Japan is 2.66, which is lower than Korea's 2.99. Both countries are showing a high degree of support for the introduction of convergence education. In particular, Japan has a very high score of 3.62, indicating that students are highly interested in introducing convergence education I think that the innovation and change of liberal arts education is the responsibility of the university that all university members should accept. In the future, various teaching methods applied (PBL) to liberal arts curriculum, and instructor workshops should be regularly and continuously carried out to focus on enhancing liberal arts education. I hope that the results of this study will help a little bit in the change of universal liberal arts education policy.

Abstract

The importance of liberal arts education in college education is emphasized recently. In order to cultivate creative talents in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the direction of restructuring of liberal arts education should be examined. This study started from this consciousness. The statistical analysis program was analyzed using IBM SPSS 22.0. The survey subjects were 194 college students in Korea. And 232 college students in Japan. The results of the analysis are as follows. In both countries, the satisfaction of teachers (professors, lecturers) and active participation in class are high, but the satisfaction of university support is low and the university authorities need to pay more attention to liberal arts education. In the case of Japan, the satisfaction level of the textbooks is low. In both countries, the degree of questioning in the liberal arts class is very low (2.66 in Korea, 2.04 in Japan). Efforts should be made so that classes can be made in 'Active Learning' so that liberal arts classes can be activated. The ratio of liberal arts education in college education is 35 out of 130 in Korea. Japan accounts for 45 out of 124 credits. In both Korea and Japan, cooperative learning and micro󰠏teaching in the liberal arts education were at an average level (3.02 in Japan, 3.06 in Japan, 3.16 in Korea, 3.25 in Korea), and the level of convergence education is very low. In particular, Japan is 2.66, which is lower than Korea's 2.99. Both countries are showing a high degree of support for the introduction of convergence education. In particular, Japan has a very high score of 3.62, indicating that students are highly interested in introducing convergence education I think that the innovation and change of liberal arts education is the responsibility of the university that all university members should accept. In the future, various teaching methods applied (PBL) to liberal arts curriculum, and instructor workshops should be regularly and continuously carried out to focus on enhancing liberal arts education. I hope that the results of this study will help a little bit in the change of universal liberal arts education policy.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 姜尙中, "悩む力" (2008), 集英社新書
  2. 나승일, "대학에서의 효과적인 교수법가이드" (2004), 서울대학교 출판원
  3. 방극철, "대학에서 교양 일본어(제2외국어) 교육 개선을 위한 실천적 제안", 日本語敎育, (74), pp.15~26 (2015), 한국일본어교육학회
  4. 방극철, "한국 대학 교양 일본어 교육의 질 관리 방안 연구", 日本語文學, 1(71), pp.49~69 (2016), 한국일본어문학회[DOI]
  5. 방극철, "日本における大学教養教育に関する基礎的研究‒M大学の教養教育を中心に‒", 일본근대학연구, (62), pp.229~252 (2018), 한국일본근대학회[DOI]
  6. 방극철, "4차 산업혁명 시대의 융합 교양교육에 관한 연구 -S대학의 교양교육 인식 실태조사와 <PPSS모델> 제안-", 日本語文學, 1(79), pp.63~89 (2018), 한국일본어문학회[DOI]
  7. 윤유진, "대학 교양교육과정 개선을 위한 국내•외 대학의 교양교육과정 비교연구", 교양교육연구, 12(2), pp.259~286 (2018), 한국교양교육학회
  8. 서남수, "한국 대학 교양교육의 구조적 난점과 과제", 교양교육연구, 4(2), pp.1~18 (2010), 한국교양교육학회
  9. 서울대 창의성 교육을 위한 교수모임, "『창의혁명』(박주용 집필 부분: 창의교육의 중심은 ‘강의’가 아니라 ‘토론과 글쓰기’)" (2018), ㈜ 대성 Korea com
  10. 손동현, "융복합 교육의 기초와 학부대학의 역할", 교양교육연구, 3(1), pp.21~32 (2009), 한국교양교육학회
  11. 손승남, "대학 교양교육 연구 및 교육 지원 방안 연구- 학술연구 분야 분류표 개선 제안을 중심으로", 교양교육연구, 12(2), pp.11~34 (2018), 한국교양교육학회
  12. 대학 교양기초교육의 표준 모델, "한국교양기초교육원", 한국교양기초교육원 교양교육컨설팅 기획위원회, ~ (2016)
  13. 井上智洋, "人工知能と経済の未来ー2030年雇用大崩壊ー" (2016), 文芸春秋
  14. 文部科学省, "中学校学習指導要領(平成29年告示)解説 総合的な学習の時間編", ~ (2018)
  15. Was ist guter Unterricht?, "좋은 수업이란 무엇인가?", pp.2011, 힐베르트 마이어(Hilbert Meyer)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)