해방 후 한국 합기도의 근원적 문제점 고찰과 개선방안

Abstract

Objective of this study is to suggest the fundamental problems which exist in Korean Hapkido and relevant improvement plans for the development of Korean Hapkido, by looking back the settlement procedures of Korean Hapkido from starting point of Korean Hapkido since the liberation in 1946 and by integrating the phenomena and problems which are scattered in the procedures. Study results which were raised up as fundamental problems through the analysis of relevant settlement procedures of Korean Hapkido after executing the analysis of data from preceding studies and literature materials and internet sites are First, the name of martial arts of Korean Hapkido has been made and used indiscreetly at chaotic situations of the times of liberation under the Japanese colonial rule. Improvements are to absorb and integrate Korean Hapkido as the name of martial arts which are currently used like Hangido and Guksul(national martial arts) in order that the waste of manpower should be saved and internal and external chaos which could occur due to the change of the name of martial arts of Korean Hapkido. Second, even though it is obvious that the formation and development of organization system of Korean Hapkido must have played an important role in expanding the base of domestic Hapkido people, the necessity of unification of Korean Hapkido is urgent for internal stability of globalization, institutionalization and recognition as traditional martial arts which are required at current times. Improvements for this unification are, first, to found the consultation body of neutral routes which has the representativeness like Kukkiiwon(World Taekwondo Headquarter), which is an already proven plan like in Taekwondo. Second, improvements toward scientific and systematic approach are required by finding and utilizing specialists through the evolution from existing head of local government-centered system to specialist-centered system. In order to actualize these plans, consultation body should be organized along with opinion gathering of specialists through academic conference and public hearings, and the systems and programs to train specialists should be continuously executed.