본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Implications of Integration of Early Childhood Education and Childcare through the Case of Nintei-kodomoen(Integrated ECEC Center)

김경철|김윤지|한재희
한국유아교육학회 (The Korean Society For Early Childhood Education)|2023.12|International Journal of Early Childhood Education|제29권 제2호|pp. 45-72|DOI 10.18023/ijece.2023.29.2.003

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

유보통합인정어린이원Nintei-kodomoen
주제분류교육학

초록

The purpose of this study is to consider the integration of early childhood education and childcare in Korea by examining the case of Nintei-kodomoen(Integrated ECEC Center) in Japan. Firstly, referring to the case of Japan, we must fully review the advantages and disadvantages of operating kindergartens, daycare centers, and new integrated institutions simultaneously and make our best efforts. Regardless of the choice of institution, children and thier parents should be protected under a unified law in safe and comfortable space. Secondly, professionalism should be guaranteed as an important issue for the qualification of teachers. Thus, the standards for training courses and qualifications should be reorganized. Additionally, in the current situation, in order to integration of Early Childhood Education and Childcare with less confusion for those who are already teachers there may be a way to classify roles according to qualifications. And sufficient time is required to transparently disclose and discuss the process of integration of early childhood education and childcare. Consequently, it would be necessary to persuade children, parents, teachers, and the society.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to consider the integration of early childhood education and childcare in Korea by examining the case of Nintei-kodomoen(Integrated ECEC Center) in Japan. Firstly, referring to the case of Japan, we must fully review the advantages and disadvantages of operating kindergartens, daycare centers, and new integrated institutions simultaneously and make our best efforts. Regardless of the choice of institution, children and thier parents should be protected under a unified law in safe and comfortable space. Secondly, professionalism should be guaranteed as an important issue for the qualification of teachers. Thus, the standards for training courses and qualifications should be reorganized. Additionally, in the current situation, in order to integration of Early Childhood Education and Childcare with less confusion for those who are already teachers there may be a way to classify roles according to qualifications. And sufficient time is required to transparently disclose and discuss the process of integration of early childhood education and childcare. Consequently, it would be necessary to persuade children, parents, teachers, and the society.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 조부경, "유아교육ㆍ보육 통합을 위한 교원 정책 방안", 한국유아교육연구, 15(1), pp.25~53 (2013), 유아교육연구소
  2. Cho, S. H., "The Integrated Service of Kindergarten and Children Day Care Center in Japan and its Policy Implication", Health & welfare policy forum, pp.87~97 (2014)
  3. Low birth rate and response policies in Korea and Japan, "Cho, S. H.", Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, 1~8, pp.Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs Issue&Focus, 298 (2015)
  4. "The Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Health & Welfare have been in a three-year battle for leadership" (2016)[URL]
  5. Han, J. H., "Current Conditions and Issues of Transition from Kindergarten to Nintei-kodomoen(Integrated ECEC Center)", The 11th International Conference of Korean Society for Early Childhood Education, pp.234~235 (2021)
  6. Kang, H. G., "A Comparative Study on the Korean and Japanese Childcare Systems", Asia Review, 14(1), pp.139~167 (2014)
  7. Kang, M. J., "Japanese teacher's general perceptions and administration practices about In Jung Children's Centers", Doctoral, pp.2007
  8. Kang, R. H., "Trends and Issues of kindergarten and Child Care Center Unification(In Jung Children's Centers)in Japan", Journal of Korean Child Care and Education, 4(2), pp.110~127 (2008)
  9. 김대욱, "유보통합을 위한 0~5세 영유아교사 자격과 영유아교육과 중심 양성체제, 그리고 기존 교원의 영유아교사 자격 부여 방안", 열린유아교육연구, 28(3), pp.1~27 (2023), 한국열린유아교육학회
  10. 김혜진, "일본의 유보통합 현황 분석 및 시사점", 일본근대학연구, (47), pp.339~354 (2015), 한국일본근대학회[DOI]
  11. 김경철, "유보통합에 관한 유치원 및 어린이집 교사의 목소리", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 23(17), pp.445~464 (2023), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
  12. 이규림, "일본 신(新)유보연계형 인정어린이원의 문제점과 시사점 고찰", 육아정책연구, 11(2), pp.149~167 (2017), 육아정책연구소[DOI]
  13. Lee, K. S., "A Study of Development of the Kindergarten and Child Care Center Integration Movement in Japan", The Korean Society for Early Childhood Education, 3(1), pp.1~33 (2007)
  14. 이성한, "일본 유보통합의 흐름과 전망", 한국일본교육학연구, 19(1), pp.33~54 (2014), 한국일본교육학회
  15. 이성한, "일본의 유보연계형 인정어린이원 교육·보육요령 탐구 - 교육‧보육요령의 목표와 내용을 중심으로 -", 한국일본교육학연구, 21(1), pp.37~58 (2016), 한국일본교육학회
  16. Ministry of Education, "Through the integration of Early Childhood Education and Child Care ‘reponsible education and care for the public from birth’", ~ (2023)
  17. 나석희, "유아교육·보육통합에 관한 유아교사와 원장의 인식", 아동교육, 23(3), pp.269~287 (2014), 한국아동교육학회
  18. OECD, "Start strong Ⅲ: A quality toolbox for early childhood education and care" (2012), OECD Publishing
  19. 오미희, "한국과 일본의 유보통합화 과정 연구", 일어일문학, (63), pp.261~280 (2014), 대한일어일문학회[DOI]
  20. 박은혜, "통합 요소별로 살펴본 8개국의 유아교육과 보육 통합 현황 비교: 노르웨이, 뉴질랜드, 덴마크, 스웨덴, 영국, 일본, 프랑스, 핀란드", 교육과학연구, 45(1), pp.149~180 (2014), 교육과학연구소
  21. "Ministry of Education, Selects 9 Leading Education Bureaus for integration of early childhood education and child care" (2023)[URL]
  22. 송기창, "누리과정 재정지원체계에 비추어 본 유보통합 재정지원체계의 설계 방향", 교육재정경제연구, 26(1), pp.27~44 (2017), 한국교육재정경제학회[DOI]
  23. Diagnosis and Countermeasures on Social Conflicts in the Field of Early Childhood Education and Childcare(ECEC), "Yang, M. S.", Korea Institute of Child Care and Education, 65~92 (2020)
  24. "日 Kindergarten·Daycare Center Integration...”Government consultation efforts are effective.”" (2022)[URL]
  25. 현정환, "일본의 유ㆍ보 일원화 문제를 둘러싼 시대적 고찰과 최근의 동향 및 과제", 한국일본교육학연구, 15(2), pp.41~63 (2011), 한국일본교육학회
  26. 逆井直紀, "保育百書 2006" (2006), ひとなる書房
  28. 文部科學省, "子ども・子育て支援新制度について", ~ (2013)
  29. "初等中等教育局 「認定こども園施設整備整備交付金実施要領」2016 年 5 月11 日一部改訂" (2016)[URL]
  30. "認定こども園施設整備交付金" (2022)[URL]
  31. 堀 嗣正, "「認定こども園」と人權保育" (2007), 明石書店
  32. 松村燈繪, "幼保一元化施設運營の取り組み調査", 国学院短期大學論文集, pp.137~150 (2005)
  33. 向平知絵, "保育制度の成立過程に関する一考察―戦後幼稚園制度を中心に", 現代 社会研究科論集, (4), pp.59~72 (2010)
  34. 角野 雅彦, "幼保総合施設「認定こども園」 の制度化に至る経緯とその課題", 四国学院大学論集, (122) (2007)
  35. 松田茂樹, "幼保一体化についての調査-幼稚園·保育所の施設調査と保護者調査", Life Design Report Autumn, 2012 (2012)
  36. 内閣府, "幼保連携型認定子供園教育保育要領解説", ~ (2015)
  37. 内閣府, "保育白書2023", pp.306~307 (2023)
  38. "令和４年度 保育関係予算等の概要" (2021)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

일본의 幼·保통합 추진 정책에 관한 연구 - 아동·육아지원 신제도를 중심으로박은희대한아동복지학회 · 아동복지연구2015 · 제13권 제1호한국과 일본의 유보통합화 과정 연구오미희대한일어일문학회 · 일어일문학2014 · 제63호일본의 유보통합 현황 분석 및 시사점김혜진, 손유진, 전윤숙한국일본근대학회 · 일본근대학연구2015 · 제47호일본 신(新)유보연계형 인정어린이원의 문제점과 시사점 고찰이규림육아정책연구소 · 육아정책연구2017 · 제11권 제2호한국 유아교육과 보육 통합의 선결 과제최은영육아정책연구소 · 육아정책연구2015 · 제9권 제1호유아교육과 보육의 통합 방안 고찰고민경, 권건일한국유아교육ㆍ보육복지학회 · 유아교육·보육복지연구2007 · 제11권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

Effects of Satisfaction in Spending Time with Family and Academic Stress on Grit among Korean Early Adolescents이유미, 김선정pp. 1-18A Qualitative Exploration of Children’s Social-Emotional Behaviors during Free Play김성애pp. 19-44The Relationship Between Parents’ Emotional Expressiveness, Parenting Efficacy, and Children’s Social–Emotional Development: Focusing on Gender Differences장유진, 은서기pp. 73-93The Longitudinal Relationship between Mother’s Parenting Stress and Children’s Externalizing Problem Behavior: Analysis of Multivariate Latent Growth Model김연주pp. 95-108Conscious Discipline as a Resilient System for Positive Early Childhood Classroom Management and Children’s Social and Emotional Competences이승연pp. 109-125
원문 보기