본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

특허권강화는 기술혁신에 대한 유효한 인센티브인가? EPO 특허자료를 중심으로

Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation : Evidence from EPO Patenting Date

안정화|서환주
기술경영경제학회 (The Korean Society For Technology Management & Economics)|2004.12|기술혁신연구 (JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION)|제12권 제3호|pp. 49-72

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

특허지적재산권기술혁신TRIPs특허권 강화
주제분류기술정책

초록

Abstract

Using panel data, this paper investigates the impacts of the strengthening of intellectual property rights (IPRs) on innovative activity. The estimation results indicate the following important implications. First, IPRs alone do not play a significant role. Second, the effect of IPRs is strong and significant only when it is interacted with complementary environments for innovation. This finding suggests that IPRs play a significant role only via a specific channel of interaction such as the stage of economic development, institutional environment and trade openness. Third, the significant correlation is not identical across countries implying that some countries were positively affected while others were negatively affected. Those countries are identified as well.

참고문헌 (54)

  1. Aoki,M, "Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis" (2001), MIT.
  2. Arora,A, "The Changing Technology of Technological Change:General and Abstract Knowledge and the Division of Innovative Labor", 23, pp.523~532 (1994)
  3. Baltagi,B. H, "Econometric Analysis of Panel Data,2d ed" (2001), John Wiley & Sons.
  4. Bessen, J, "Holdup and Licensing of Cumulative Innovations with Private Information", 82(3), pp.321~326 (2004)
  5. Bessen, J, "Sequential Innovation, Patents and Imitation" (2000)
  6. Boldrin, M, "The Case against Intellectual Property", 92(2), pp.209~212 (2002)
  7. Bresnhan, T. F, "Information Technology, Workplace Organization and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-level Evidence", 117(1), pp.339~376 (2002)
  8. Cohen, W. M, "Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not)", 7552 (2000)
  9. Cornelli, F, "Patent Renewals and R&D Incentives", 30(2), pp.197~213 (1999)
  10. Coriat, B, "Establishing a New Intellectual Property Rights Regime in the United States Origins, Content and Problem", 31, pp.1491~1507 (2002)
  11. Gallini, N. T, "The Economics of Patents:Lessons from Recent U.S. Patent Reform", 16(2), pp.131~154 (2002)
  12. Geroski, P. A, "Innovative Activity over Business Cycle", 105, pp.916~928 (1995)
  13. Ginarte, J. C, "Determinants of Patent Rights: A Cross National Study", 26, pp.283~301 (1997)
  14. Gould, D. M, "The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Economic Growth", 48, pp.323~350 (1996)
  15. Griliches,Z, "Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators:A Survey", 28, pp.1661~1707 (1990)
  16. Grossman,G. M, "Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy,Cambridge,MA" (1991), MIT Press.
  17. Grossman, G. M, "International Protection of Intellectual Property" (2004)
  18. Guellec, D, "Causes of Fluctuations in R&D Expenditures", 29, pp.123~138 (1997)
  19. Hall,B. H, "The Financing of Research and Development", 8773 (2002)
  20. Hall, B. H, "The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1975-1995", 32(1), pp.101~128 (2001)
  21. Heller, M. A, "Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anti Commons in Biomedical Research", pp.698~701 (1998)
  22. Henderson, R, "Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965-1988", 80, pp.127~199 (1998)
  23. Jaffe,A. B, "The U.S. Patent System in Transition: Policy Innovation and the Innovation Process", 29, pp.531~557 (2000)
  24. Kang S, "Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Induce More Patents?" (2004)
  25. Kanwar, S, "Does Intellectual Property Protection Spur Technological Change?", 55, pp.235~264 (2003)
  26. Kortum, S, "Assessing the Contribution of Venture Capital to Innovation", 31(4), pp.674~692 (2000)
  27. Kortum, S, "What is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting?", 28, pp.1~22 (1999)
  28. Kortum, S, "Research, Patenting and Technological Change", 65, pp.1389~1419 (1997)
  29. Klein, B, "The Economics of Copyright ‘Fair Use’ in a Networked World", 92(2), pp.205~208 (2002)
  30. Lai,E, "Intellectual Property Rights Protection and the Rate of Product Innovation", 55, pp.115~130 (1998)
  31. Lall,S, "Indicators of the Relative Importance of IPRs in Developing Countries", 32, pp.1657~1680 (2003)
  32. Lerner,J, "Patent Protection and Innovation Over 150 Years", 8977 (2002)
  33. Lerner, J, "Where Does State Street Lead? A First Look at Finance Patents, 1971-2000", 7918 (2000)
  34. Mandel,M. J, "The Coming Internet Depression" (2000), Basic Books.
  35. Mansfield,E, "Patents and Innovation:An Empirical Study", 32, pp.173~181 (1986)
  36. Maskus,K. E, "Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy," (2000), Institute for International Economics.
  37. Mazzoleni, R, "The Benefits and Costs of Strong Patent Protection: A Contribution to the Current Debate", 27, pp.273~284 (1998)
  38. Mowery, D. C, "The Growth of Patenting and Licensing by U.S. Universities: An Assessment of the Effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980", 30, pp.99~119 (2001)
  39. Mowery, D. C, "Patenting and Licensing University Inventions: Lesson from the History of the Research Corporation", 10(2), pp.317~355 (2001)
  40. Mowery, D. C, "University Patents and Patent Policy Debates in the USA, 1925-1980", 10, pp.781~814 (2001)
  41. Mowery, D. C, "Learning to Patent: Institutional Experience, Learning, and the Characteristics of U.S. University Patents After the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981-1992", 48, pp.73~89 (2001)
  42. Mowery, D. C, "Academic Patent Quality and Quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States", 31, pp.399~418 (2002)
  43. Nelson, "Investment in Humans", and eco 61(mic growth), pp.69~75 (1966)
  44. Nordhaus, "A Theoretical Treatment of Technological Change" (1969), MIT Press.
  45. Park, W. G, "Index of Patent Rights" (2002)
  46. Rapp,R. T, "Benefits and Costs of Intellectual Property Protection in Developing Countries", 24, pp.75~102 (1990)
  47. Romer,P, "Endogenous Technological Change", 98, pp.71~102 (1990)
  48. Romer, P, "When Should We Use Intellectual Property Rights?", 92(2), pp.213~216 (2002)
  49. Sakakibara, M, "Do Stronger Patents Induce More Innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese Patent Law Reforms", 32(1), pp.77~100 (2001)
  50. Schankerman,M, "How Valuable is Patent Protection? Estimates by Technology Field", 29(1), pp.77~107 (1998)
  51. Scotchmer,S, "Standing on the Shoulders of Giants:Cumulative Research and the Patent Law", 5, pp.29~42 (1991)
  52. Shapiro, C, "Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard-Setting", 1, pp.119~150 (2000)
  53. Trajtenberg,M, "A Penny for Your Quotes:Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations", 21, pp.172~187 (1990)
  54. World Bank, "Intellectual Property: Balancing Incentives with Competitive Access" (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

특허권 강화는 기술혁신을 촉진하는가? 한국의 특허법 개혁을 중심으로서환주, 송종국, 정동진한국국제경제학회 · 국제경제연구2004 · 제10권 제2호특허권보호제도의 변화가 연구개발지출과 특허권 산출의 관계에 미치는 영향김희정, 조성표기술경영경제학회 · 기술혁신연구2006 · 제14권 제3호특허권 강화와 기술혁신에 관한 실증연구: 우리나라의 제 11차 특허법 개혁을 중심으로오준병, 장원창한국경제학회 · 경제학연구2008 · 제56권 제2호기업의 연구개발투자가 특허에 미치는 영향: 한국 제조업기업을 대상으로김태기, 장선미기술경영경제학회 · 기술혁신연구2004 · 제12권 제1호특허권 강화와 특허출원 변화의 기술혁신 및 생산성 파급효과: 산업내 및 IT산업의 산업간 파급효과를 중심으로강성진, 김정언기술경영경제학회 · 기술혁신연구2007 · 제15권 제1호Responses of Incumbents to Patent Enforcement: An Examination of the Korean Case박창수, 오준병경제연구소 · Seoul Journal of Economics2013 · 제26권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

기술수용모델을 이용한 사이버강의 수용의 영향요인이원준, 장정무, 김태웅pp. 1-24유형별 혁신 네트워크가 혁신성과에 미치는 영향 - 한국의 혁신적 기업을 사례로이성근, 이관률pp. 25-48과학기술혁신을 위한 National Project의 성공적 정책집행의 요인조국현pp. 73-96R&D집약도와 시장구조김병우pp. 97-110신제품 개발 프로젝트에서의 요소기술 중요도 결정 방안 : QFD와 다구치 방법의 적용양종서, 박용태, 윤일배, 윤명환pp. 111-134
원문 보기