성향 및 상황 조절초점이 행동/무행동에 대한 소비자 후회에 미치는 영향
The influence of chronic regulatory focus, situational regulatory focus, and action/inaction on consumer's regret
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구에서는 조절초점이 행동과 무행동에 대한 후회에 영향을 미치는가를 재검증하였으며, 조절초점은 성향과 상황 양자에 의해 영향을 받기에 이 둘을 모두 고려하였다. 연구결과, 촉진초점의 참가자는 행동보다 무행동에서 더 후회를 하였으며, 예방초점의 참가자는 무행동보다 행동에서 더 후회를 하였다. 또한 성향촉진초점을 지니면서 촉진초점 상황조작을 받은 조건에서는 행동보다 무행동을 더 후회한 반면, 성향예방초점을 지니면서 예방초점 상황조작을 받은 조건에서는 무행동보다 행동을 더 후회하였다. 성향조절초점과 반대되는 상황조절초점 조작이 이루어진 조건에서는 행동과 무행동에 대한 후회에 유의한 차이가 없었다.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine whether there is really a link between regulatory focus and regret on action/inaction or not. This study takes both chronic and situational regulatory focus into account and explores the influence of chronic and situational regulatory focus and action/inaction on consumers' regret. The results shows that promotion focused consumers regret inactions more than actions, but prevention focused consumers regret actions more than inactions. Also the results shows that regrets on action/inaction are influenced by chronic-situational regulatory focus. This study verifies that there is a association between regulatory focus and regrets on action/inaction, and that the problem of which one tends to be regretted more can be explained by regulatory focus.
참고문헌 (37)
- 전인수, "소비자 후회: 사후가정사고의 영향 및 후회해소노력이 구매후 행동에 미치는 영향", 마케팅연구, 21(4), pp.165~187 (2006), 한국마케팅학회
- 나준희, "소비자의 조절적 동기가 구매후 후회에 미치는 영향", 한국심리학회지: 소비자·광고, 5(1), pp.35~51 (2004), 한국소비자·광고심리학회
- 박지숙, "의사결정 상황에서 행동과 비행동에 따라 경험하는 후회", 한국심리학회지: 소비자·광고, 8(1), pp.1~33 (2007), 한국소비자·광고심리학회
- 양윤, "성향 및 상황 조절초점과 과제수행 피드백이 소비자 감정에 미치는 영향", 한국심리학회지: 소비자·광고, 9(3), pp.473~499 (2008), 한국소비자·광고심리학회
- 허태균, "사후가정사고의 활성화에서 조절적 동기의 역할", 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 15(2), pp.159~171 (2001)
- Bell, D. E, "Regret in decision making under uncertainty", Operations Research, 30, pp.961~981 (1982)
- Connolly, T, "Regret in decision making", Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(6), pp.212~216 (2002)
- Cooke, A. D. J, "Avoiding future regret in purchase-timing decisions", Journal of Consumer Research, 27, pp.447~459 (2001)
- Crow, E, "Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 69, pp.117~132 (1997)
- Gilovich, T, "The experience of regret: What, when and why", Psychological Review, 102(2), pp.379~395 (1995)
- Higgins,E.T, "Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience in Social psychology, Handbook of basic principles" (1996), Guilford
- Higgins,E.T, "Beyond pleasure and pain", American Psychologist, 52, pp.1280~1300 (1997)
- Kahneman, D, "Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives", Psychological Review, 93(2), pp.136~153 (1986)
- Kahneman, D, "The psychology of preferences", Scientific American, 246(1), pp.160~173 (1982)
- Landman,J, "Regret: The persistence of the possible" (1993), Oxford University Press
- Lewis,M, "Self-conscious emotions: Embarrassment, pride, shame, and guilt in Handbook of emotions", pp.623~636 (2000), Guilford Press
- Lockwood, P, "Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), pp.205~218 (2002)
- Loomes, G, "Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty", The Economic Journal, 92(368), pp.805~824 (1982)
- Markman, K. D, "The mental simulation of better and worse possible worlds", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, pp.87~109 (1993)
- Patrick, V. M, "Coping with it: Regret for action vs. inaction in the consumer context", Adavances in Consumer Research, 30, pp.241~248 (2003)
- Pennington, G. L, "Self-regulatory focus and counterfactual thought", Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, ~, pp.Unpublished raw data (2000)
- Roese,N.J, "The functional basis of counterfactual thinking", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, pp.805~818 (1994)
- Roese,N.J, "Counterfactual thinking", Psychological Bulletin, 121, pp.133~148 (1997)
- Roese, N. J, "Affective determinants of counterfactual thinking", Social cognition, 15(4), pp.274~290 (1997)
- Roese, N. J, "Conterfactual thinking and regulatory focus: Implications for action versus inaction and sufficiency versus necessity", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), pp.1109~1120 (1999)
- Roese, N. J, "The structure of counterfactual thought", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(3), pp.312~319 (1994)
- Roese, N. J, "Counterfactual thinking: The intersection of affect and function", Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, pp.1~59 (1997)
- Roese, N. J, "Regret and behavior: Comment on Zeelenberg and Pieters", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(1), pp.25~28 (2007)
- Seta, J. J, "To do or not to do: Desirability and consistency mediate judgement of regret", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, pp.861~870 (2001)
- Shah, J, "Expectancy x value effects: Regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), pp.447~458 (1997)
- Shah, J, "Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), pp.285~293 (1998)
- Spranca, M, "Omission and commission in judgment and choice", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, pp.76~105 (1991)
- Tsiros, M, "Regret: A model of its antecedents and consequences in consumer decision making", Journal of Consumer Research, 26, pp.401~417 (2000)
- Zeelenberg, M, "Consequences of regret aversion: Effects of expected feedback on risky decision making", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(2), pp.148~158 (1996)
- Zeelenberg, M, "A theory of regret regulation 1.0", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(1), pp.3~18 (2007)
- Zeelenberg, M, "The inaction effect in the psychology of regret", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), pp.314~327 (2002)
- Zeelenberg, M, "Undoing regret on dutch television: Apologizing for interpersonal regrets involving actions or inactions", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(10), pp.1113~1119 (1998)
