연구규범과 가치관을 통해 본 한국 과학기술자사회의 성격: 공공부문 연구자를 중심으로
Norms and Values of Korean Scientific Community
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
By analyzing a nation-wide survey, this article examines research related norms and values of 684 scientists in 16 universities and 7 government supported research institutes. The survey shows that Korean scientific community tends to reject communality and disinterestedness while it accepts universalism as a norm. Organized skepticism is received a lukewarm support. In contrast, Korean scientific community tends to perceive the intellectual property and secrecy as legitimate and believe that scientists should consider the applicability of scientific research outcome and its social impacts when they choose research topics. When other variables are controlled for, the more basic research a scientist conducts the scientist is more likely to support communality and reject secrecy. The younger scientists are less likely to accept disinterestedness and the claim that the scientists should keep distance from social issues than the older. Scientists who work in the government-supported research institutes are more likely to view secrecy for more than 6 months as legitimate and reject the claim that science should not be affected by society than university scientists. The implications of these findings are discussed.
Abstract
By analyzing a nation-wide survey, this article examines research related norms and values of 684 scientists in 16 universities and 7 government supported research institutes. The survey shows that Korean scientific community tends to reject communality and disinterestedness while it accepts universalism as a norm. Organized skepticism is received a lukewarm support. In contrast, Korean scientific community tends to perceive the intellectual property and secrecy as legitimate and believe that scientists should consider the applicability of scientific research outcome and its social impacts when they choose research topics. When other variables are controlled for, the more basic research a scientist conducts the scientist is more likely to support communality and reject secrecy. The younger scientists are less likely to accept disinterestedness and the claim that the scientists should keep distance from social issues than the older. Scientists who work in the government-supported research institutes are more likely to view secrecy for more than 6 months as legitimate and reject the claim that science should not be affected by society than university scientists. The implications of these findings are discussed.
참고문헌 (34)
- 김동광, "과학기술대중화와 시민참여-전매된 과학대중화와 국가주의", 2004년 한국과학기 술학회 전기학술대회 발표문 (2004)
- 김영식, "근현대 한국사회의 과학" (1998), 창작과비평사
- 김영우, "한국 과학기술정책 50년의 발자취" (1997), 과학기술정책관리연구소.
- 머튼, "과학사회학" (1998), 민음사
- 민철구, "과학기술자 사기진작을 위한 정책방안" (2001), 과학기술정책연구원
- 박성래, "우리과학 100년" (2001), 현암사
- 박희제, "과학의 상업화와 과학자사회 규범구조의 변화:공유성과 이해관계의 초월규범을 중심으로", 한국사회학, 40(4), pp.19~47 (2006), 한국사회학회
- 박희제, "한국 대학에서의 과학 연구의 성격과 변화 ：1980년대 이후 연구개발비 흐름을 중심으로", 사회이론, (30), pp.213~244 (2006), 한국사회이론학회
- 서이종, "한국 산학관계의 구조와 문화", 한국사회과학, 22(2), pp.199~224 (2000)
- 송성수, "과학기술자사회의 형성과 특징", 한국 과학 자사회의 특성분석- 탈 추격체제로의 전환을 중심으로, pp.27~71 (2003), 과학기술정책연구원
- 송위진, "한국 과학자사회의 특성분석- 탈 추격체제로의 전환을 중심으로" (2003), 과학기술정책연구원
- 오진곤, "과학사회학 입문-과학의 사회사적 접근" (1997), 전파과학사
- 웹스터, "과학기술과 사회" (1998), 한울 아카데미
- 윤정로, "과학기술과 한국사회" (2000), 문학과지성사
- 이은경, "이공계 기피 논의를 통해 본 한국과학자 사회의 특성", 과학기술학연구, 6(2), pp.77~102 (2006)
- 이장재, "대학연구의 현황과 미래: 연구조직을 중심으로" (1997), 과학기술정책관리연구소
- Blumenthal, D., "Withholding Research Results in Academic Life Science: Evidence from a National Survey of Faculty", Journal of American Medical Association, 277(15), pp.1224~1228 (1997)
- Blumenthal, D,, "Relationships between academic institutions and industry: an industry survey", New England Journal of Medicine, 334, pp.368~373 (1996)
- Blumenthal, D., "Participation of life science faculty in research relationships with industry: extent and effects", New England Journal of Medicine, 335, pp.1734~1739 (1996)
- Blumenthal, D., "Industrial Support of University Research in Biotechnology", Science, 231, pp.242~246 (1986)
- Etzkowitz, H., "The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of Unievrsity-Industry -Government Relations", Research Policy, 31(11), pp.109~121 (2000)
- Etzkowitz,H., "Entrepreneurial Science in the Academy: A Case of the transformation of Norms", Social Problems, 36(1), pp.14~29 (1989)
- Etzkowitz, H., "Capitalizing Knowledge" (1998), SUNY Press
- Gaston,J., "The Reward System in British and American Science" (1978), John Willey & Sons
- Gibbons, M., "The New Production of Knowledge" (1994), Sage
- Long,J.S., "Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables" (1997), Sage
- Louis, K. S., "Entrepreneurs in Academe: An Exploration of Behaviors among Life Scientists", Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), pp.110~131 (1989)
- Mitroff, I., "Norms and Counter-Norms in a Selected Group of the Apollo Moon Scientists", American Sociological Review, 39, pp.579~595 (1974)
- Mulkay,M.J., "Norms and Ideology in Science", Social Science Information, 15(4), pp.637~656 (1976)
- Stehr, N., "The Ethos of Science Revisited: Social and Cognitive Norms", Sociological Inquiry, 48(3), pp.173~196 (1976)
- Webster,A., "University-Corporate Ties and the Construction of Research Agendas", Sociology, 28(1), pp.123~142 (1994)
- Yearley,S., "Making Sense of Science" (2005), Sage
- Ziman,J., "Real Science: What it is, and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press", American Sociological Review, 49(2), pp.512~525 (2000)
- Zuckerman,H., ""The Sociology of Science”, Neil. Smelser (ed.)", pp.511~574 (1988), Handbook of Sociology, Thousand Oaks: Sage