지엄의 일승사상 고찰 - 이교판(二敎判)의 재검토를 통해 -

Abstract

Ven. Zhiyan(智儼) has two types of doctrinal taxonomy. These are Donggyo(同敎)-Byeolgyo(別敎) and Gonggyo(共敎)-Bulgonggyo(不共敎). His outlook of One vehicle of Huayan is revealed by these two type of doctrinal taxonomy, however among the existing researches of his thought, they have regarded these two types of doctrinal taxonomy as the same. The reasons of misunderstanding is that they look upon Zhiyan’s thought develop more and more, however, in Kongmuzhang(孔目章), the work of his latest years, there just appears the name of Donggyo and Byeolgyo. Also, they consider that the period of Zhiyan, his One vehicle thought of Huayan is not until ven. Fazang(法藏) that it is completed. For these reasons, his doctrinal taxonomy can not fully comprehend. On the text of Zhiyan’s works, these two types of doctrinal taxonomy have different usages. The classification of Gonggyo-Bulgonggyo use for revealing Huayanjing(華嚴經) itself and for descriptive method. Donggyo-Byeolgyo, included in One vehicle of Gonggyo, use for exposing the relation between One vehicle of Huayan and other vehicles. This also disproves that he do not has the thought ‘Huayanjing is One vehicle of Byeolgyo’. Thus, this paper critically examine the previous researches of Ziyan’s dichotomy doctrinal taxonomy, and by reading his text of works more closely, it is clear that his thought of doctrinal taxonomy is not incomplete, rather, it would be right to say that he advocates One vehicle thought of Huayan through all of his writings as complete form.