디그나가 인식논리에 대한 동아시아 불교논리에로의 변용 - 현장의 유식비량을 둘러싼 논쟁을 중심으로 -

Abstract

Kyu-ki(窺基), disciple of the Xianzang, substantial renovation of Yusigbeobsangjong(唯識法相宗) explained in detail in his own logic book Inmyeong-ibjeonglilonso(『因明入正理論疏』), in order to use Yusigbilyang(唯識比量) as an important basis for propagating Yusigbeobsangjong(唯識法相宗). There is an active debate in the Buddhist community in China, Korea, and Japan over Yusigbilyang (唯識比量). Therefore, the thesis aims to explore how Dignāga’s logic is applied and transformed in East Asia, focusing on Kyu-ki’s claims and Wonhyo’s counterarguments surrounding Xianzang(玄奘)’s Yusigbilyang(唯識比量). In conclusion, it can be confirmed that Dignāga’s Logics expresses its assertions with Dignāga’s rules of Logic as it is learned by Chinese and Korean thinkers, and that the opponents use it well as a means or tool to point out errors in the other’s arguments based on Dignāga’s rules of Logic. However, East Asian civilizations have a strong distrust of language and reasoning. For this reason, it seems that Dignāga’s Logics was no longer systematically studied in East Asian Buddhism.