본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

통일 이미지 인식변화 및 통일교육의 패러다임 전환 필요성- 통일의식조사결과를 중심으로-

The Need to Change the Perception of Unification Image and the Paradigm of Unification Education- Focusing on the Results of the Unification Consciousness Survey -

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타사회과학

초록

According to a comparative analysis of the recent unification consciousness survey conducted by four unification-related organizations, including the Seoul National University Institute for Unification and Peace, the majority of the people prefer inter-Korean unification, the second phase of the national community unification plan, rather than the rigid unification goal of one country and one system. According to the survey, many people expect and are concerned about excessive unification costs, confusion from social and cultural differences, and conflicts from political and economic system differences in order to reach a unified state, the ultimate goal of the "National Community Unification Plan." In the rapidly changing era of global diversification, I don't think there's a need to stick to the image of a unified state as a single state system. Many people prefer the image of inter-Korean union-style unification, which meets nationalist demands, pacifist demands, and pragmatic needs but does not have to worry about differences in unification costs, cultural differences, politics, and ideology. Therefore, it is important to present the easiest and most feasible image of unification and to reach social consensus. To this end, unification education must also change its paradigm. Existing unification education has developed a negative perception of unification by calculating its advantages and disadvantages on the premise of a single state, that is, an ultimate unified state, and reinforcing its image. Now, it is suggested that the goal of unification education should be to compare the issue of unification costs, socio-economic, cultural, and institutional differences between the two Koreas, and actively promote and educate the benefits of unification on the premise of the image of unification in the inter-Korean union method of peace and coexistence.

Abstract

According to a comparative analysis of the recent unification consciousness survey conducted by four unification-related organizations, including the Seoul National University Institute for Unification and Peace, the majority of the people prefer inter-Korean unification, the second phase of the national community unification plan, rather than the rigid unification goal of one country and one system. According to the survey, many people expect and are concerned about excessive unification costs, confusion from social and cultural differences, and conflicts from political and economic system differences in order to reach a unified state, the ultimate goal of the "National Community Unification Plan." In the rapidly changing era of global diversification, I don't think there's a need to stick to the image of a unified state as a single state system. Many people prefer the image of inter-Korean union-style unification, which meets nationalist demands, pacifist demands, and pragmatic needs but does not have to worry about differences in unification costs, cultural differences, politics, and ideology. Therefore, it is important to present the easiest and most feasible image of unification and to reach social consensus. To this end, unification education must also change its paradigm. Existing unification education has developed a negative perception of unification by calculating its advantages and disadvantages on the premise of a single state, that is, an ultimate unified state, and reinforcing its image. Now, it is suggested that the goal of unification education should be to compare the issue of unification costs, socio-economic, cultural, and institutional differences between the two Koreas, and actively promote and educate the benefits of unification on the premise of the image of unification in the inter-Korean union method of peace and coexistence.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 강동완, "북한주민의 통일의식 조사 연구: 북한주민 100명 면접조사를 중심으로", 통일정책연구, 23(2), pp.1~31 (2014), 통일연구원
  2. 2021 통일의식조사, "김범수", 서울대학교 통일평화연구원, ~ (2021)
  3. 2022 통일의식조사, "김범수", 서울대학교 통일평화연구원, ~ (2022)
  4. 김정은 집권 10년, 북한주민 통일의식, "김병로", 서울대학교 통일평화연구원, ~ (2022)
  5. 김상범, "‘민족공동체통일방안’의 계승·발전 방안 연구", 북한학연구, 12(1), pp.147~185 (2016), 북한학연구소[DOI]
  6. 독일통일 30년이 한국에 주는 교훈, "류우익", 서울대학교 아시아 연구소, ~ (2022)
  7. 박찬석, "윤석열 정부의 통일교육의 방향 변화와 전망", 유관순연구, 28(1), pp.113~135 (2023), 유관순연구소[DOI]
  8. 남북연합 개념 및 추진방안, "유석렬", 통일연구원, ~ (2001)
  9. 윤영상, "유럽통합의 경험과 남북연합에의 시사점", 북한연구학회보, 23(2), pp.131~158 (2019), 북한연구학회
  10. 요약보고서 2022년 국민 통일의식조사, "KBS 공영미디어연구소", ~ (2022)
  11. KBS 공영미디어연구소, "2022년 국민 통일의식조사", 통일방송연구, 39 (2022)
  12. KBS 남북교류협력단, "2021년 국민 통일의식조사", 통일방송연구, 37 (2021)
  13. 2021년 학교통일교육 실태조사 결과보고서, "통일부 국립통일교육원", 통일부, ~ (2021)
  14. 2022년 학교통일교육 실태조사 결과보고서, "통일부 국립통일교육원", 통일부, ~ (2022)
  15. 통일교육 기본방향, "통일부 국립통일교육원", ~ (2023)
  16. KINU 통일의식조사 2021, "통일연구원", 통일연구원, ~ (2021)
  17. KINU 통일의식조사 2022, "통일연구원", ~ (2022)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)