마가복음에 나타난 갈릴리와 예루살렘의 공간 구도와 역학 관계에 대한 연구사적 이해
Understanding of the History of Studies on a Spatial Structure between Galilee and Jerusalem in Mark’s Narrative and their Dynamic Relationship
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Understanding of the History of Studies on a Spatial Structure between Galilee and Jerusalem in Mark’s Narrative and their Dynamic Relationship - Marcan Spatial Presentation and its Theological Significance - Sun Wook Kim (Westminster Graduate School of Theology) This study has the purpose of introducing the history of studies on Markan spatial presentation in terms of the relationship between Galilee and Jerusalem. For this, I will show diverse opinions on a spatial structure and a dynamic interaction between Galilee and Jerusalem. The incipient investigations used historical and redactional methodologies to focus on the conflict between Galilee and Jerusalem, assuming the historical reality of a distinct Galilean community: Galilean community and Jerusalem community were situated in rivalry and opposition. In addition, some argued that Galilee was an alternative to Jerusalem as a location for the expected Parousia or the eschatological realization of the kingdom of God. With the development of literary approaches, the relationship between Galilee and Jerusalem has been explored in terms of Mark’s presentation of narrative space. On the basis of structuralism, Mark’s narrative was analyzed in the frame of a mythic structure that generates two opposing poles (spaces). In a narratival dimension, one may examine Markan narrative space, which contains historical, social, symbolic, and cosmic characteristics. Sociological approach suggested lateral and vertical ethnicity models to interpret Mark’s narrative, in which Galilee and Jerusalem are the objects of restoration. In Jesus’ ministry, Galilee stands for a greater Israel in lateral ethnicity model and Jerusalem represents a renewal of Israel’s identity in vertical ethnicity model. Finally, there was a study on Markan spatial presentation centered on the person of Jesus. Jesus’ geographical movements and spatial practices provide a new spatial configuration focused not on the synagogue and the temple but on Jesus himself. It is not the places where power is concentrated (e.g., the synagogue and the temple), but the places ready to accept the new order and authority (e.g., the villages, the seaside, the wilderness, the mountain, and the way) where Jesus performs an alternative spatial practice by teaching, caring, healing, and revealing himself to the people of God. In this paper, I will survey all these understandings of Markan spatial presentation and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses. I believe the space that Mark describes has historical, social, literary, symbolic, and ideological implications, and the understanding of Markan spatial presentation may help to disclose the theological purpose and significance in Mark’s narrative. The study of Markan spatial presentation, therefore, will serve as a fresh hermeneutical lens to interpret the Gospel of Mark.
Abstract
Understanding of the History of Studies on a Spatial Structure between Galilee and Jerusalem in Mark’s Narrative and their Dynamic Relationship - Marcan Spatial Presentation and its Theological Significance - Sun Wook Kim (Westminster Graduate School of Theology) This study has the purpose of introducing the history of studies on Markan spatial presentation in terms of the relationship between Galilee and Jerusalem. For this, I will show diverse opinions on a spatial structure and a dynamic interaction between Galilee and Jerusalem. The incipient investigations used historical and redactional methodologies to focus on the conflict between Galilee and Jerusalem, assuming the historical reality of a distinct Galilean community: Galilean community and Jerusalem community were situated in rivalry and opposition. In addition, some argued that Galilee was an alternative to Jerusalem as a location for the expected Parousia or the eschatological realization of the kingdom of God. With the development of literary approaches, the relationship between Galilee and Jerusalem has been explored in terms of Mark’s presentation of narrative space. On the basis of structuralism, Mark’s narrative was analyzed in the frame of a mythic structure that generates two opposing poles (spaces). In a narratival dimension, one may examine Markan narrative space, which contains historical, social, symbolic, and cosmic characteristics. Sociological approach suggested lateral and vertical ethnicity models to interpret Mark’s narrative, in which Galilee and Jerusalem are the objects of restoration. In Jesus’ ministry, Galilee stands for a greater Israel in lateral ethnicity model and Jerusalem represents a renewal of Israel’s identity in vertical ethnicity model. Finally, there was a study on Markan spatial presentation centered on the person of Jesus. Jesus’ geographical movements and spatial practices provide a new spatial configuration focused not on the synagogue and the temple but on Jesus himself. It is not the places where power is concentrated (e.g., the synagogue and the temple), but the places ready to accept the new order and authority (e.g., the villages, the seaside, the wilderness, the mountain, and the way) where Jesus performs an alternative spatial practice by teaching, caring, healing, and revealing himself to the people of God. In this paper, I will survey all these understandings of Markan spatial presentation and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses. I believe the space that Mark describes has historical, social, literary, symbolic, and ideological implications, and the understanding of Markan spatial presentation may help to disclose the theological purpose and significance in Mark’s narrative. The study of Markan spatial presentation, therefore, will serve as a fresh hermeneutical lens to interpret the Gospel of Mark.
참고문헌 (31)
- Sun Wook Kim, "Jesus’ Missional Movement in Mark 4:35-8:21: Markan Spatial Presentation and Its Hermeneutical Significance", Ph.D., pp.2013
- Elizabeth S. Malbon, "Galilee and Jerusalem: History and Literature in Marcan Interpretation", CBQ, 44 (1982)
- Eric C. Stewart, "Gathered around Jesus: An Alternative Spatial Practice in the Gospel of Mark" (2009), Cascade Books
- Ernst Lohmeyer, "Galiläa und Jerusalem" (1936), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
- Robert Henry Lightfoot, "Locality and Doctrine in the Gospels (The Bampton Lectures)" (1938), Harper & Brothers
- William Davies, "The Gospel and the Land: Early Christianity and Jewish Territorial Doctrine" (1974), University of California Press
- Seán Freyne, "The Geography of Restoration: Galilee-Jerusalem Relations in Early Jewish and Christian Experience", NTS, 47 (2001)
- Hermann L. Strack, "Kommentar zum Neuen Testament aus Talmud und Midrasch (vol. 1)", pp.160~ (1922), Beck
- Naphtali Wieder, "The Judean Scrolls and Karaism" (1962), East and West Library
- Leonard Elliott Elliott-Binns, "Galilean Christianity (SBT)" (1956), Alec R. Allenson
- Günter Stemberger, "The Gospel and the Land: Early Christianity and Jewish Territorial Doctrine" (1974), University of California Press
- Willi Marxsen, "Mark the Evangelist: Studies on the Redaction History of the Gospel" (1969), Abingdon
- Willi Marxsen, "Der Evangelist Markus: Studien Zur Redaktionsgeschichte des Evangeliums" (1956), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
- 로마이어, "Das Evangelium des Markus", pp.355~356 (1967), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
- Ernst Haenchen, "Der Weg Jesu: Eine Erklärung des Markus-Evangeliums und der kanonischen Parallelen", pp.546~ (1966), Töpelmann
- Werner H. Kelber, "The Kingdom in Mark: A New Place and a New Time" (1974), Fortress
- Friedrich Blass, "A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature", pp.175~ (1961), University of Chicago Press
- R. T. France, "The Gospel of Mark: A Commentary on the Greek Text (NIGTC)" (2002), Eerdmans
- Robert A. Guelich, "Mark 1-8:26", pp.44~ (1989), Thomas Nelson
- C. H. Dodd, "The Parables of the Kingdom", pp.28~30 (1961), Scribner
- Werner Georg Kümmel, "Promise and Fulfilment: The Eschatological Message of Jesus", pp.19~25 (1961), SCM
- William L. Lane, "The Gospel According to Mark: The English Text with Introduction, Exposition, and Notes (NICNT)" (1974), Eerdmans
- David Daube, "The New Testament and Rabbinic Judaism", pp.158~163 (1973), Arno
- Morna D. Hooker, "The Gospel According to Saint Mark (BNTC)", pp.292~ (1991), Hendrickson
- Robert H. Stein, "Mark (BECNT)", pp.596~ (2008), Baker Academic
- Howard Clark Kee, "review of Werner Kelber, The Kingdom in Mark: A New Place and a New Time", JR, 56, pp.123~ (1976)
- Elizabeth S. Malbon, "Narrative Space and Mythic Meaning in Mark" (1986), Harper & Row
- Seán Freyne, "Galilee, Jesus and the Gospels: Literary Approaches and Historical Investigations" (1988), Fortress
- Grant R. Osborne, "The Hermeneutical Spiral: A Comprehensive Introduction to Biblical Interpretation", pp.473~ (2006), InterVarsity Press
- David Rhoads, "Mark as Story: An Introduction to the Narrative of a Gospel" (1999), Augsburg Fortress
- Kent E. Brower, "review of Eric C. Stewart, Gathered around Jesus: An Alternative Spatial Practice in the Gospel of Mark", JSNT, 33, pp.56~57 (2011)