본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

지역사회 거주 고령자의 라이프스타일 측정도구에 관한 조사: 경향과 활용전망

Systematic Study on the Multifaceted Lifestyle Assessment Tools For Community-dwelling Elderly: Trend and Application Prospect

박지혁|원경아|박강현
대한신경계작업치료학회 (Korean Society for Neurological Occupational Therapy)|2019.08|재활치료과학 (Therapeutic Science for Rehabilitation)|제8권 제3호|pp. 7-29|DOI https://doi.org/10.22683/tsnr.2019.8.3.007

0

조회

0

다운로드

18

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

고령자ElderlyHealthSystematic review건강체계적 고찰라이프스타일 프로파일Multifaceted lifestyle profile

초록

목적: 본 연구의 목적은 고령자의 다면적 라이프스타일 프로파일 개발을 위해 라이프스타일을 포괄적으로평가하는 도구 뿐만 아니라, 라이프스타일의 기본요소인 신체적 활동과 영양 그리고 활동 및 참여를평가하는 도구들을 체계적으로 분석하여 제시하고자 한다. 연구방법: 포괄적 라이프스타일 평가도구의 경우 2001년 1월부터 2019년 6월까지 CINANL, NDSL, PubMed, Riss을 사용하여 문헌을 수집하였으며, 검색어는 lifestyle assessment" OR "lifestyle profile" OR "lifestyle test"를 사용하였다. 라이프스타일 구성요소별 평가도구 관련 문헌 검색의 경우 2010년부터1 월 부터, 2019년 6월까지 CINANL, NDSL, PubMed, Riss을 사용하여 문헌을 수집하였으며, 검색어는"physical activity assessment", OR "physical activity participation profile", "nutrition assessment" 그리고“activity participation assessment” OR “activity participation and lifestyle”을 사용하였다. 결과: 검색결과로 얻은 4,165편의 문헌 중 선정기준에 부합하는 31편의 연구가 최종적으로 선정되었으며, 총 31편의 논문에서 포괄적 라이프스타일 평가도구는 총 5종류로 모두 자가응답식 평가도구이며, Health Enhancement Lifestyle Profile(HELP)와 Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile(HPLP)이 각각 3편(33%)으로가장 많이 사용되었다. 신체 활동 평가도구의 경우 자가응답식 설문형식의 평가도구가 7편(58%)으로가장 많았고, 설문 형식의 평가 방법의 보완으로 객관적 평가도구인 가속도계를 기반으로 한 평가도구4개(33%), 고령자를 위한 식이 평가도구는 Mini-Nutritional Assessment(MNA)가 3편(42%)로 가장 많이사용 됨을 알 수 있었다. 활동 참여의 평가도구의 경우 총 5종류의 평가도구가 노인의 활동 참여를측정하기 위해 사용되는 것으로 분석되었고 그 중 Meaningful Activity Participation Assessment(MAPA) 가 3편(43%)으로 가장 많이 사용된 것으로 나타났다. 결론: 31편의 문헌 고찰 결과, 고령자의 라이프스타일과 관련된 평가도구는 총 21개로 나타났다. 포괄적평가도구는 자가보고식의 평가가 기반이 된 항목이 많았고, 주로 음주, 흡연, 운동 및 식이와 사회적 활동에 관한 참여 빈도 및 시간을 측정하는 것으로 나타났다. 그 외 라이프스타일의 주요 구성 요소로평가도구로는 대부분 자가보고식의 평가형식이며, 활동에 대한 참여여부와 빈도를 측정하는 것으로나타났다. 따라서 본 연구는 기존의 포괄적 라이프스타일 평가도구와 라이프스타일의 각 항목별 평가도구의 종류, 평가항목 및 측정방법을 분석함으로써, 향후 고령자의 다면적 라이프스타일을 평가 할 수있는 표준화된 평가도구를 개발하는데 기초자료로 활용 될 것으로 사료된다

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to analyze comprehensive lifestyle assessment and other assessments which evaluate essential lifestyle factors, including physical activity, nutrition and activity participation. Methods: To analyze the comprehensive lifestyle assessment, from January 2001 to June 2019, a literature search was conducted using the CINANL, NDSL, PubMed, and RISS databases. The search terms were ‘lifestyle assessment’ OR ‘lifestyle profile’ OR ‘lifestyle test’. In terms of other assessments of essential factors of lifestyle, from January 2010 to June 2019, articles were searched using similar databases. The search terms were ‘physical activity assessment’ OR ‘physical activity participation profile’, ‘nutrition assessment’, ‘activity participation assessment’ OR ‘activity participation and lifestyle’. Results: A total of 4,165 articles were obtained, and finally 31 articles were selected according to the inclusion criteria. Among 31 articles, there were five with comprehensive lifestyle assessments, and all of them were self-report questionnaires. The most popular assessments were the Health Enhancement Lifestyle Profile (HELP) and the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile (HPLP), which were used in three articles (33%). In terms of assessment of physical activity, the most frequently used evaluation method was the self-report questionnaire, which was used in seven articles (58%) followed by objective assessments, which were used in four articles (33%). It was demonstrated that the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) was the most frequently used for nutrition assessment in the elderly. There were five types of assessment tool used for activity participation. Among them, meaningful activity participation assessment (MAPA) was the most frequently used tool. Conclusion: As a result of the systematic review, it was found that there are 21 assessments related to the evaluation of lifestyle in the elderly. Most assessments employed the self-report questionnaire method and mainly evaluated frequency and duration of participation in drinking, smoking, exercise, nutrition and social activities. Assessments of essential lifestyle factors were the self-report questionnaire method and the participation and frequency of activity. Therefore, by analyzing assessment tools, types of items and measurement methods of comprehensive lifestyle assessments and other assessment of essential lifestyle factors, this study provides the basic data on which to develop a standardized assessment tool that can evaluate the multifaceted lifestyle profile of the elderly.

참고문헌 (53)

  1. 생활시간조사 방법론 개선방안 연구 최종보고서, "김영원", 한국조사연구학회, ~ (2010)
  2. Aygar, H., "Assessment of health-promoting lifestyle behaviors of adults living in the semi-rural area", Northern Clinics of Istanbul, 6(1), pp.13~20 (2019)[DOI]
  3. Ahmad, S., "Evaluation of reliability and validity of the general practice physical activity questionnaire(GPPAQ)in 60-74 year old primary care patients", BMC Family Practice, 16(1), pp.113~121 (2015)[DOI]
  4. Belloc, N. B., "Relationship of physical health status and health practices", Preventive Medicine, 1(3), pp.409~421 (1972)[DOI]
  5. Bauer, J., "The scored patient-generated subjective global assessment is an effective nutrition assessment tool in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease", The European E-Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, 6(1), pp.27~30 (2011)[DOI]
  6. Chow, H. Y., "Activity participation profile of older people in the community : A pilot study", Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal, 24(1), pp.47~53 (2006)[DOI]
  7. Clark, F., "Occupational therapy for independent-living older adults", Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, pp.1321~1326 (1997)[DOI]
  8. D'Addio, G., "A telemedicine home care based activity monitor device", IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications, pp.579~582 (2011)
  9. Eakman, A. M., "reliability and validity study of the Meaningful Activity Participation Assessment", 박사, pp.2007
  10. Aaron M. Eakman, "The Meaningful Activity Participation Assessment: A Measure of Engagement in Personally Valued Activities", The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 70(4), pp.299~317 (2010), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  11. Elley, C. R., "Screening for lifestyle and mental health risk factors in the waiting room : Feasibility study of the case-finding health assessment tool", Canadian Family Physician, 60(11), pp.527~534 (2014)
  12. Goodyear-Smith, F., "Asking for help is helpful : Validation of a brief lifestyle and mood assessment tool in primary health care", The Annals of Family Medicine, 7(3), pp.239~244 (2009)[DOI]
  13. Harris, D. M., "Health-protective behavior : An exploratory study", Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 20, pp.17~29 (1979)[DOI]
  14. Hu, F. B., "Preventing chronic diseases by promoting healthy diet and lifestyle : Public policy implications for China", Obesity Reviews, 12(7), pp.552~559 (2011)[DOI]
  15. Hurtig-Wennlof, A., "The international physical activity questionnaire modified for the elderly : Aspects of validity and feasibility", Public Health Nutrition, 13(11), pp.1847~1854 (2010)[DOI]
  16. Hwang, J. E., "Promoting healthy lifestyles with aging : Development and validation of the health enhancement lifestyle profile(HELP)using the Rasch measurement model", American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(5), pp.786~795 (2010)[DOI]
  17. Hwang, J. E., "Reliability and validity of the health enhancement lifestyle profile(HELP)", Occupation, Participation and Health, 30(4), pp.158~168 (2010)[DOI]
  18. Hwang, J. E., "Construct validation of the health enhancement lifestyle profile(HELP)with quality of life among community-dwelling older adults", Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatric, 28(2), pp.117~130 (2010)[DOI]
  19. Hwang, J. E., "Development and validation of a 15-item lifestyle screening for community-dwelling older adults", American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66(6), pp.98~106 (2012)[DOI]
  20. Hwang, J. E., "Reliability of the health enhancement lifestyle profile–screener(HELP–Screener)", American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(1), pp.6~10 (2013)[DOI]
  21. Ismail, N., "The physical activity scale for the elderly(PASE) : Validity and reliability among community-dwelling older adults in Malaysia", Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 27(8), pp.62~72 (2015)[DOI]
  22. Jackson, J. M., "Lifestyle redesign: Implementing the well elderly program" (1999), AOTA
  23. Janet Yewon Jeon, "Clustering Patterns and Correlates of Multiple Health Behaviors in Middle-aged Koreans with Metabolic Syndrome", 보건교육건강증진학회지, 29(2), pp.93~105 (2012), 한국보건교육건강증진학회[DOI]
  24. 정은화, "노인 여가참여 평가도구에 대한 체계적 고찰", 대한작업치료학회지, 26(3), pp.39~55 (2018), 대한작업치료학회[DOI]
  25. Jung, H. Y., "Reliability and validity of the Korean version of health enhancement lifestyle profile(K-HELP)", 석사, pp.2013
  26. Kate, S, "Active and successful aging, lifestyle as a gerontological idea", Recherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques, 44(1), pp.33~49 (2013)
  27. 김정연, "노인에서 건강행태, 건강수준, 일상생활수행능력, 건강관련 삶의 질과의 관계", 한국노년학, 30(2), pp.471~484 (2010), 한국노년학회
  28. Kim, S. K., "Development of lifestyle assessment inventory for wellness of Korean adults", The Korean Journal of Physical Education-Human and Social Science, 39(4), pp.963~982 (2000)
  29. Kleemola, L., "Twelve-month clinical follow-up study of voice patients' recovery using the voice activity and participation profile(VAPP)", Journal of Voice, 25(5), pp.245~254 (2011)[DOI]
  30. Kortajarena, M., "Objectively and subjectively measured physical activity and its relation to cardiovascular risk factors in older people—Which is most appropriate?", Maturitas, 123(1), pp.61~66 (2019)[DOI]
  31. Knoops, K., "Mediterranean diet, lifestyle factors, and 10-year mortality in elderly European men and women : The HALE project", JAMA, 292(12), pp.1433~1439 (2004)
  32. Laffrey, S. C., "An exploration of adult health behavior", Western Journal of Nursing Research, 12(4), pp.434~447 (1990)[DOI]
  33. Lam, G. E., "Consideration in analysis of nutrition survey data from Korea national health and nutrition examination survey", Korean Journal of Family Practice, 7(1), pp.1~2 (2017)[DOI]
  34. 이지희, "한·일 노인의 건강관련 라이프스타일과 생활기능의 관계", 보건사회연구, 32(1), pp.58~88 (2012), 한국보건사회연구원[DOI]
  35. 이혜옥, "MNA (Mini Nutritional Assessment)를 이용한 건강증진센터 내원 노인의 영양상태 판정", 대한영양사협회 학술지, 16(2), pp.122~132 (2010), 대한영양사협회
  36. Lyons, R., "Healthy lifestyle: Strengthening the effectiveness of lifestyle approaches to improve health" (2000), Health Canada
  37. Nam, G. E., "Consideration in analysis of nutrition survey data from Korea national health and nutrition examination survey", Korean Journal of Family Practice, 7(1), pp.1~2 (2017)[DOI]
  38. Neuhouser, M., "Physical activity assessment : Biomarkers and self-report of activity-related energy expenditure in the WHI", American Journal of Epidemiology, 177(6), pp.576~585 (2013)[DOI]
  39. May, A. M., "The impact of a healthy lifestyle on disability-adjusted life years : A prospective cohort study", BMC Medicine, 13(1), pp.39~ (2015)[DOI]
  40. Mcdougall, K., "an the mini nutritional assessment (MNAⓇ) be used as a nutrition evaluation tool for subacute inpatients over an average length of stay?", The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging, 19(10), pp.1032~1036 (2015)
  41. Okubo, Y., "Development of the nutrition and functionality assessment(NFA)among older adults in Japan", The Journal of Frailty & Ageing, 7(3), pp.187~192 (2018)
  42. 박영신, "성별에 따른 한국 중고령자의 건강 생활양식의 군집현상 및 우울감과의 관계", 보건교육건강증진학회지, 33(1), pp.1~12 (2016), 한국보건교육건강증진학회[DOI]
  43. Pergolotti, M., "Predicting participation in meaningful activity for older adults with cancer", Quality of Life Research, 24(5), pp.1217~1222 (2015)[DOI]
  44. Roley, S. S., "Occupational therapy practice framework : Domain & process-2nd edition", American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(6), pp.625~683 (2008)[DOI]
  45. Sutherland, L. L., "Northwest Latinos’ health promotion lifestyle profiles according to diabetes risk status", Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 14(6), pp.999~1005 (2012)[DOI]
  46. 손기영, "한국형 노인신체 활동도구의 개발 및 타당도, 신뢰도 검증", Annals of geriatric medicine and research, 16(2), pp.55~65 (2012), 대한노인병학회[DOI]
  47. Slattery, A., "Does the mini nutrition assessment—short form predict clinical outcomes at six months in older rehabilitation patients?", Nutrition & Dietetics, 72(1), pp.63~68 (2015)[DOI]
  48. Vieira, L. S., "Validity assessment of the nutrition screening initiative checklist in older adults", Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 15(1), pp.16~20 (2016)[DOI]
  49. Tambag, H., "Evaluation of the psychoeducation given to the elderly at nursing homes for a healthy lifestyle and developing life satisfaction", Community Mental Health Journal, 49(6), pp.742~747 (2013)[DOI]
  50. 원경아, "지역사회 노인을 대상으로 적용한 라이프스타일 중재의 형태와 효과에 관한 체계적 고찰", 재활치료과학, 8(2), pp.7~30 (2019), 대한신경계작업치료학회[DOI]
  51. World Health Organization., "International classification of functioning, disability and health : ICF" (2001), World Health Organization
  52. "Noncommunicable disease" (2015)[URL]
  53. Zhang, L., "Assessing the nutritional status of elderly Chinese lung cancer patients using the mini-nutritional assessment(MNAⓇ)tool", Clinical Interventions in Aging, 8(1), pp.287~291 (2013)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

지역사회 노인을 대상으로 적용한 라이프스타일 중재의 형태와 효과에 관한 체계적 고찰박상미, 박지혁, 신윤찬, 원경아, 한아름대한신경계작업치료학회 · 재활치료과학2019 · 제8권 제2호아동 및 청소년의 라이프스타일 평가도구에 관한 조사: 체계적 고찰김아람, 박지혁대한신경계작업치료학회 · 재활치료과학2022 · 제11권 제2호Predicting Healthy Lifestyle Patterns in Older Community Dwelling Adults: A Latent Profile Analysis박강현, 박지혁, 양민아, 원경아대한신경계작업치료학회 · 재활치료과학2021 · 제10권 제2호지역사회 거주 허약 노인의 라이프스타일 중재의 효과: 체계적 고찰박지혁, 이지연한국노인작업치료학회 · 한국노인작업치료학회지2021 · 제3권 제1호지역사회 노인의 건강한 라이프스타일을 위한 건강증진프로그램 중재효과에 대한 체계적 고찰이수경, 이지수한국디지털정책학회 · 디지털융복합연구2020 · 제18권 제4호Test-retest Reliability of the Yonsei Lifestyle Profile (YLP) for Older Adults박강현, 한대성대한신경계작업치료학회 · 재활치료과학2025 · 제14권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

섭식 장애가 있는 뇌성마비 아동에게 적용된 구강감각운동치료방법에 대한 체계적 고찰서상민, 민경철pp. 31-41수행기반 인지기능평가를 위한 예비연구 : 정상 노인을 대상으로곽호성, 박지혁pp. 43-55단기 집단 복합중재가 정상 노인의 인지기능 및 우울에 미치는 영향최유진, 정범진pp. 57-68한국어 초점 발화 시 우반구 손상인의 초점 운율 특성박현, 이명순pp. 69-81파워카드 전략이 자폐범주성장애아동 어휘 향상에 미치는 효과박선희, 안아현pp. 83-95
원문 보기