본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일 대학병원 정신과에 협진 의뢰된 환자 중 의뢰의가 섬망 진단을 놓치게 하는 요인: 예비연구

Patient Characteristics in Cases of Misdiagnosed Delirium upon Psychiatric Consultation in a University Hospital : A Pilot Study

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류정신과학

초록

Objectives: The misdiagnosis of delirium may result in a delay of correct diagnosis and appropriate treatment of the delirium. Additionally, aggravation of physical illnesses can occur. The objective of this study was to investigate patient characteristics in cases of misdiagnosed delirium upon psychiatric consultation in a university hospital. Methods: Subjects included patients with delirium among all who we had consulted over a 12week span. Psychiatric diagnosis was made by two well-trained psychiatrists by means of the DSM-IV-TR. Cognitive function, level of delirium, and physical function were evaluated by the Korean version of Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE-K), the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98(DRS-R-98), the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS), and the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF). In addition, we collected socio-demographic information, date of admission and consultation, present causes of consultation, and speculated psychiatric diagnoses made by referring physicians. Results: Among 45 subjects with delirium, only 28 patients (62%) were diagnosed with delirium by referring physicians at the time of consultation. The remaining 17 patients (38%) had been diagnosed with other illnesses. The group of misdiagnosed patients tended to have a longer duration of formal education than those that had been correctly diagnosed. Conclusion: Early diagnosis and intervention of delirium can minimize subsequent problems related to delayed diagnosis. Therefore, it is vital to identify the factors related to misdiagnoses by referring physicians. This study showed that a longer duration of formal education is a contributing factor for the misdiagnosis of delirium. Longer education may cover up the typical symptoms of delirium. This can keep referring physicians from making a correct diagnosis. This study was a pilot study investigating diagnostic accuracy of delirium by referring physicians. Additional, well-controlled studies are warranted.

Abstract

Objectives: The misdiagnosis of delirium may result in a delay of correct diagnosis and appropriate treatment of the delirium. Additionally, aggravation of physical illnesses can occur. The objective of this study was to investigate patient characteristics in cases of misdiagnosed delirium upon psychiatric consultation in a university hospital. Methods: Subjects included patients with delirium among all who we had consulted over a 12week span. Psychiatric diagnosis was made by two well-trained psychiatrists by means of the DSM-IV-TR. Cognitive function, level of delirium, and physical function were evaluated by the Korean version of Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE-K), the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98(DRS-R-98), the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS), and the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF). In addition, we collected socio-demographic information, date of admission and consultation, present causes of consultation, and speculated psychiatric diagnoses made by referring physicians. Results: Among 45 subjects with delirium, only 28 patients (62%) were diagnosed with delirium by referring physicians at the time of consultation. The remaining 17 patients (38%) had been diagnosed with other illnesses. The group of misdiagnosed patients tended to have a longer duration of formal education than those that had been correctly diagnosed. Conclusion: Early diagnosis and intervention of delirium can minimize subsequent problems related to delayed diagnosis. Therefore, it is vital to identify the factors related to misdiagnoses by referring physicians. This study showed that a longer duration of formal education is a contributing factor for the misdiagnosis of delirium. Longer education may cover up the typical symptoms of delirium. This can keep referring physicians from making a correct diagnosis. This study was a pilot study investigating diagnostic accuracy of delirium by referring physicians. Additional, well-controlled studies are warranted.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 이진영, "섬망 환자의 치료에서 haloperidol과 quetiapine의 효과 비교: 전향성 개방 연구", 생물치료정신의학, 12(2), pp.162~171 (2006), 대한생물치료정신의학회
  2. 김병수, "섬망에 대한 정신신체의학적 중재", 정신신체의학, 16(2), pp.75~80 (2008), 한국정신신체의학회
  3. Francis J, "Prognosis after hospital discharge of older medical patients with deli", J Am Geriatr Soc, 40, pp.601~606 (1992)
  4. Pompei P, "Delirium in hospitalized older persons: outcomes and predictors", J Am Geriatr Soc, 42, pp.809~815 (1994)
  5. Inouye SK, "A predictive model for delirium in hospitalized elderly medical patients based on admission characteristics", Ann Intern Med, 119, pp.474~481 (1993)
  6. Martin NJ, "Development of delirium: a prospective cohort study in a community hospital", Int Psychogeriatr, 12, pp.117~127 (2000)
  7. McNicoll L, "Delirium in the intensive care unit: occurrence and clinical course in older patients", J Am Geriatr Soc, 51, pp.591~598 (2003)
  8. Gustafson Y, "Acute confusional states in elderly patients treated for femoral neck fracture", J Am Geriatr Soc, 36, pp.525~530 (1988)
  9. Swigart SE, "Misdiagnosed delirium in patient referrals to a university-based hospital psychiatry department", Psychosomatics, 49, pp.104~108 (2008)
  10. Kishi Y, "Delirium: patient characteristics that predict a missed diagnosis at psychiatric consultation", Gen Hosp Psychiatry, 29, pp.442~445 (2007)
  11. 김정란, "섬망의 역학", 정신신체의학, 16(2), pp.81~86 (2008), 한국정신신체의학회
  12. Ko HJ, "Dementia and delirium among elderly patients in a general hospital medical ward", J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc, 36, pp.85~91 (1997)
  13. Armstrong SC, "The misdiagnosis of delirium", Psychosomatics, 38, pp.433~439 (1997)
  14. Farrell KR, "Misdiagnosing delirium as depression in medically ill elderly patients", Arch Intern Med, 155, pp.2459~2464 (1995)
  15. Inouye SK, "Nurses’ recognition of delirium and its symptoms: comparison of nurse and researcher ratings", Arch Intern Med, 161, pp.2467~2473 (2001)
  16. Folstein MF, "“Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician", J Psychiatr Res, 12, pp.189~198 (1975)
  17. Kwon YC, "Korean version of Mini-mental state examination (MMSE-K) Part I: development of the test for the elderly", J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc, 28, pp.125~135 (1989)
  18. Trzepacz PT, "Validation of the Delirium Rating Scale-revised-98: comparison with the delirium rating scale and the cognitive test for delirium", J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, 13, pp.229~242 (2001)
  19. Guy W, "Clinical global impression" (1976), National Institute of Mental Health
  20. Kim CY, "Psychiatric assessment instruments", pp.51~53 (2001), Hana Medical Publishing Company
  21. Oken MM, "Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group", Am J Clin Oncol, 5, pp.649~655 (1982)
  22. Endicott J, "The global assessment scale. A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance", Arch Gen Psychiatry, 33, pp.766~771 (1976)
  23. Jones RN, "Does educational attainment contribute to risk for delirium? A potential role for cognitive reserve", J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 61, pp.1307~1311 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)