본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Survey on ‘Go Bag’ Items in Internet Shopping Malls

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose - This research was to help distribution of Go Bags (Survival Bag or Disaster Supplies Kit), which are useful for disaster preparedness, by surveying precomposed Go Bag items in internet shopping malls. Research design, data, and methodology - We checked 15 items including food, water, first aid kit, radio, flashlight or candles, battery, lighter or matches, whistle, blanket, towel, toilet paper, personal sanitations, raincoat, can opener, disaster manual in Go Bags based on the recommendations by the Ministry of the Interior and Safety. The number of items and price, domestic product, accreditation were compared using a Chi-square test. The Pearson’s R was also used to summarize the strength of the linear relationship between the number of items and price, sub-items. Results - Mean of the sub-items was 21, and mean of the items was 8. There was a statistically significant difference between the number of items size and the price level (p=.014). There was also a statistically significant difference between the number of items and sub-items (p<.001), and correlation coefficient was a positive linear relationship of .467. Conclusions - Only eight were sold in the internet shopping malls as a precomposed Go Bag items. Even the approved Go Bags had no difference in the number of items. Higher prices had a relatively greater number of items, and it had a positive correlation between the size of sub-items and items.

Abstract

Purpose - This research was to help distribution of Go Bags (Survival Bag or Disaster Supplies Kit), which are useful for disaster preparedness, by surveying precomposed Go Bag items in internet shopping malls. Research design, data, and methodology - We checked 15 items including food, water, first aid kit, radio, flashlight or candles, battery, lighter or matches, whistle, blanket, towel, toilet paper, personal sanitations, raincoat, can opener, disaster manual in Go Bags based on the recommendations by the Ministry of the Interior and Safety. The number of items and price, domestic product, accreditation were compared using a Chi-square test. The Pearson’s R was also used to summarize the strength of the linear relationship between the number of items and price, sub-items. Results - Mean of the sub-items was 21, and mean of the items was 8. There was a statistically significant difference between the number of items size and the price level (p=.014). There was also a statistically significant difference between the number of items and sub-items (p<.001), and correlation coefficient was a positive linear relationship of .467. Conclusions - Only eight were sold in the internet shopping malls as a precomposed Go Bag items. Even the approved Go Bags had no difference in the number of items. Higher prices had a relatively greater number of items, and it had a positive correlation between the size of sub-items and items.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Becker, J. S., "Salient beliefs about earthquake hazards and household preparedness", Risk Anal, 33(9), pp.1710~1727 (2013)
  2. "Logger and Internet Trend" (2019)[URL]
  3. Cohen, J., "Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences" (1988), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  4. Eisenman, D. P., "Variations in disaster preparedness by mental health, perceived general health and disability status", Disaster Med Public Health Prep, 3(1), pp.33~41 (2009)
  5. "Federal Emergency Management Agency" (2018)[URL]
  6. Gershon, R. R., "Emergency preparedness in a sample of persons with disabilities", Am J Disaster Med, 8(1), pp.35~47 (2013)
  7. Han, Z., "Natural hazards preparedness in Taiwan : A comparison between households with and without disabled members", Health Secur, 15(6), pp.575~581 (2017)
  8. Levac, J., "Household emergency preparedness : A literature review", J Community Health, 37(3), pp.725~733 (2012)
  9. Levin, K. L., "Disaster planning for vulnerable populations: Leveraging Community Human Service Organizations direct service delivery personnel", J Public Health Manag Pract, (Suppl 5), pp.S79~82 (2014)
  10. "Ministry of the Interior and Safety" (2017)[URL]
  11. "Ministry of the Interior and Safety" (2016)[URL]
  12. "Ministry of the Interior and Safety" (2015)[URL]
  13. "NAVER" (2019)[URL]
  14. Paek, H. J., "Theory-based approaches to understanding public emergency preparedness : Implications for effective health and risk communication", Health Commun, 15(4), pp.428~444 (2010)
  15. Anesh Sthapit, "Construal Levels and Online Shopping: Antecedents of Visits to and Purchases from Online Retailers’ Websites", 산경연구논집, 7(3), pp.19~25 (2016), 한국유통과학회
  16. Tang, J. S., "Residents' disaster preparedness after the Meinong Taiwan earthquake: A test of protection motivation theory", Int J Environ Res Public Health, 15(7), pp.E1434~ (2018)
  17. Thomas, T. N., "Influences of preparedness knowledge and beliefs on household disaster preparedness", Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 64(35), pp.965~971 (2015)
  18. Uhm, T. H., "Disaster Medicine and Management" (2019), Daihak Publishing
  19. "United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction" (2019)[URL]
  20. Uscher-Pines, L., "Disaster preparedness of households with special needs in southeastern Pennsylvania", Am J Prev Med, 37(3), pp.227~230 (2009)
  21. Wyte-Lake, T., "Developing a home-based primary care disaster preparedness toolkit", Disaster Med Public Health Prep, 11(1), pp.56~63 (2017)
  22. Wyte-Lake, T., "The role of the home-based provider in disaster preparedness of a vulnerable population", Gerontology, 60(4), pp.336~345 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)