본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국문헌을 통해본 중세 동남아의 불교문화(Ⅰ): 법현(法顯)과 의정(義淨)의 저술을 중심으로

Some Views for the Budhist Culture of Southeast Asia at Midle Ages through the Chinese Description (Ⅰ): Focused on the documents of Faxian and Ichong

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Even Faxian(法顯)'s Gaosengfaxianchuan (高僧法顯傳) and Iching(義淨)'s Nanhaijguineifachuan (南海寄歸內法傳) are regarded as very important and useful documents to study the southeast asian budhist culture, it is very dificult to grasp the contemporary state of those area because their descriptions are very brief and implicit. Therefore this esay aimed an in-depth reading their documents as original texts of modern understanding of those area, and tried to make a new views to aproach the southeast asian buddhist culture by some more historicaly and concretely. At the early 5th century when Faxian(法顯) arived, Buddhism was flourished in Sri Lanka. Because already a long time pased since the Saṇgha was schismatized into conservative and progresive at around the dominical year, he mentioned nothing about the conflict or disharmony of two orders. And the faith of Buddha toth relic, which had ben uprisen at 50 years ago from Faxian's visitng, was concretely established as a representative religion of Sri Lanka. Acording to his record, the carying ritual of this Budha toth was performed very magnifcently as similar with recent Korean Youngsan ceremony(靈山齋). In the mean time, it loks there were many sculptures of Budha image made of precious stone of special product from Sri Lanka. The faith of Buddha-pāda(the Buddha's fot-prints) was also generalized at that time. The most famous monk of his contemporary Sir Lanka was Buddhaghosa, the author of Visuddhi-maga, but it is not sure that Faxian had met him. It can be suspected that the funeral in which Faxian participated could be belonged to him, or the Visuddhi-magga was writng at the peak during Faxian's staying. On the way to return to China, Faxian embarked an indigenous ship around Indonesia. It means there were no chinese trade ship which he can use. So the trade betwen china and southeast asia was advanced by south asian ships, and the chinese ships were not yet joined at that time so activity. And at least until that time, it loks there were no any remarkable buddhist movement in the southeast asian countries by where he stopped. In contrast, the southeast asian world which be sen by Iching had already experienced a lot of changes. He was impresed by the high quality buddhist culture of those area, and insisted to acept it to china. Further, he analyzed the sects of budhism which were prevalent around the southeast asia in his contemporary time, and tried to make a god relationship with each native monks for learning from them. It loks the center of those exchanges may be Śrīvijaya of Indonesia. He also mentioned the situation of the late 7th century's Funan(扶南) in Cambodia. At that time, the budhist Saṇgha was opresed by newly rising Khmer(眞臘). On the other hand, he described the points of samenes and diference in detail betwen Indian and southeast asian buddhist culture in the field of ritual as like the practical use of garments, buddha images, and daily recited scriptures. There must be a lot of another aspects which this esay couldn't gather up or catch from these documents. Nevertheles, I hope this esay can help the researchers of this field and wil wait for any advices and comments from them.

Abstract

Even Faxian(法顯)'s Gaosengfaxianchuan (高僧法顯傳) and Iching(義淨)'s Nanhaijguineifachuan (南海寄歸內法傳) are regarded as very important and useful documents to study the southeast asian budhist culture, it is very dificult to grasp the contemporary state of those area because their descriptions are very brief and implicit. Therefore this esay aimed an in-depth reading their documents as original texts of modern understanding of those area, and tried to make a new views to aproach the southeast asian buddhist culture by some more historicaly and concretely. At the early 5th century when Faxian(法顯) arived, Buddhism was flourished in Sri Lanka. Because already a long time pased since the Saṇgha was schismatized into conservative and progresive at around the dominical year, he mentioned nothing about the conflict or disharmony of two orders. And the faith of Buddha toth relic, which had ben uprisen at 50 years ago from Faxian's visitng, was concretely established as a representative religion of Sri Lanka. Acording to his record, the carying ritual of this Budha toth was performed very magnifcently as similar with recent Korean Youngsan ceremony(靈山齋). In the mean time, it loks there were many sculptures of Budha image made of precious stone of special product from Sri Lanka. The faith of Buddha-pāda(the Buddha's fot-prints) was also generalized at that time. The most famous monk of his contemporary Sir Lanka was Buddhaghosa, the author of Visuddhi-maga, but it is not sure that Faxian had met him. It can be suspected that the funeral in which Faxian participated could be belonged to him, or the Visuddhi-magga was writng at the peak during Faxian's staying. On the way to return to China, Faxian embarked an indigenous ship around Indonesia. It means there were no chinese trade ship which he can use. So the trade betwen china and southeast asia was advanced by south asian ships, and the chinese ships were not yet joined at that time so activity. And at least until that time, it loks there were no any remarkable buddhist movement in the southeast asian countries by where he stopped. In contrast, the southeast asian world which be sen by Iching had already experienced a lot of changes. He was impresed by the high quality buddhist culture of those area, and insisted to acept it to china. Further, he analyzed the sects of budhism which were prevalent around the southeast asia in his contemporary time, and tried to make a god relationship with each native monks for learning from them. It loks the center of those exchanges may be Śrīvijaya of Indonesia. He also mentioned the situation of the late 7th century's Funan(扶南) in Cambodia. At that time, the budhist Saṇgha was opresed by newly rising Khmer(眞臘). On the other hand, he described the points of samenes and diference in detail betwen Indian and southeast asian buddhist culture in the field of ritual as like the practical use of garments, buddha images, and daily recited scriptures. There must be a lot of another aspects which this esay couldn't gather up or catch from these documents. Nevertheles, I hope this esay can help the researchers of this field and wil wait for any advices and comments from them.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. "高僧法顯傳 (T.2085)", ~
  2. "南海寄歸內法傳 (T.2125)", ~
  3. "大唐西域求法高僧傳 (T.2066)", ~
  4. 慧皎, "高僧傳․高僧法顯傳․南海寄歸內法傳" (2004), 동국역경원
  5. 의정, "大唐西域求法高僧傳" (1980), 동국대학교 역경원
  6. 이주형, "시각문화의 전통과 해석 (靜齋 金理那 敎授 정년퇴임기념 미술사논문집)" (2007), 도서출판 예경
  7. 김혜원, "동아시아 구법승과 인도의 불교유적", pp.399~419 (2009), 사회평론
  8. 이윤표, "불경에 나타난 파니니 문법: 의정의 남해기귀내법전을 중심으로", 한국어학, 5 (1997), 한국어학회
  9. 장충식, "신라석탑연구" (2000), 일지사
  10. 장언원, "歷代名畵記" (2008), 시공아트
  11. 이시이 요네오, "동남아시아의 불교수용과 전개" (2001), 불교시대사
  12. 스가누마 아키라, "산스끄리뜨의 기초와 실천" (1993), 민족사
  13. 이와모도 유타까, "동남아 불교사-상좌부 불교의 전개와 현황-" (1987), 반야샘
  14. 히로 사치야, "소승불교와 대승불교" (1994), 민족사
  15. 에띠엔 라모뜨, "인도불교사" (2006), 시공사
  16. 王邦維, "南海寄歸內法傳校注" (1995), 中華書局
  17. 章巽, "法顯傳校注" (1985), 上海古籍出版社
  18. 陳佳榮, "古代南海地名匯釋" (2002), 中華書局
  19. 中國美術全集編輯委員會, "原始社會至南北朝繪畫" (1993), 人民美術出版社
  20. 肥塚隆, "東南アジア" (2002), 小學館
  21. Goldman. R. P., "Devavāṇīpraveśikā" (1999), University of California
  22. I-Ching, "A record of the Buddhist religion as practised in India and the Malay archipelago (A. D. 671-695)" (1966), Munshiram Manoharlal

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)