6월항쟁의 헌법적 평가와 관련자 예우 문제

Abstract

The democratization movement in Korea continued in various ways such as the April 19 Revolution, the May 18 Democratic Movement, and he Busan-Masan Democratic Uprising in order to achieve the desire for democracy until the June 1987 Uprising. The June Uprising became an opportunity to grow Korea's democracy through nationwide participation. This study examines the constitutional significance of the June Uprising and the honorable treatment for those involved in the June Uprising as follows. First, the spirit of the June Uprising was indirectly reflected in the preamble of the constitution as succeeding the 3·1 Movement and 4·19 Democratic Ideology. Second, the resistance to the long-term power of the June Uprising introduced a five-year single-term presidential system and blocked running for the president through constitutional amendment. Third, the June Uprising changed the presidential election method used by the ruling powers to extend the government from indirect elections to direct elections by the people. Fourth, it is very necessary to enact laws related to the June Uprising because the honorable Treatment for those involved in the June Uprising is limited because no direct laws have been enacted.