본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Re-writing World Literature through Juxtaposition: Decolonizing Comparative Literature in Vietnam

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Postcolonial critics have criticized Comparative Literature for exclusively studying literatures from the non-Western world through Western lenses. In other words, postcolonial criticism asserts that theorists and practitioners of comparative literature have traced the "assistance" of the classic "comparison and contrast" approach to an imperialist discourse, which sustains the superiority of Western cultures and economies. As a countermeasure to reading through the comparative lens, literary theories have offered a "juxtapositional model of comparison" that connects texts across cultures, places, and times. This paper examines practices of Comparative Literature in Vietnam, revealing how the engagement with decolonizing processes leads to a knowledge production that is paradoxically colonial. The paper also analyses implementations of this model in reading select Vietnamese works and highlights how conventional comparisons, largely based on historical influences and reception, maintain the colonial mapping of World Literature, centralizing Western, and more particularly, English Literature and in the process marginalizing the others. Therefore, the practice of juxtaposing Vietnamese literary works with canonical works of the World Literature will provoke dialogues and raise awareness of hitherto marginalized works to an international readership. In this process, the paper considers the contemporary interest of Comparative Literature practice in trans- national, trans-regional, trans-historical, and trans-cultural perspectives.

Abstract

Postcolonial critics have criticized Comparative Literature for exclusively studying literatures from the non-Western world through Western lenses. In other words, postcolonial criticism asserts that theorists and practitioners of comparative literature have traced the "assistance" of the classic "comparison and contrast" approach to an imperialist discourse, which sustains the superiority of Western cultures and economies. As a countermeasure to reading through the comparative lens, literary theories have offered a "juxtapositional model of comparison" that connects texts across cultures, places, and times. This paper examines practices of Comparative Literature in Vietnam, revealing how the engagement with decolonizing processes leads to a knowledge production that is paradoxically colonial. The paper also analyses implementations of this model in reading select Vietnamese works and highlights how conventional comparisons, largely based on historical influences and reception, maintain the colonial mapping of World Literature, centralizing Western, and more particularly, English Literature and in the process marginalizing the others. Therefore, the practice of juxtaposing Vietnamese literary works with canonical works of the World Literature will provoke dialogues and raise awareness of hitherto marginalized works to an international readership. In this process, the paper considers the contemporary interest of Comparative Literature practice in trans- national, trans-regional, trans-historical, and trans-cultural perspectives.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Anderson, Deland, "Through Days of Easter: Time and Narrative in The Sound and the Fury", Literature and Theology, 4(3), pp.311~324 (1990)
  2. Ball, Philip, "Unnatural: The Heretical Idea of Making People" (2011), The Bodley Head
  3. Bassett, J. E, "Family Conflict. The Sound and the Fury", Studies in American Fiction, 9(1), pp.1~20 (1981)
  4. Cao, Shunqing, "The Construction of a New Paradigm of Comparative Literature Studies", Comparative Literature: East & West, 8(1), pp.31~56 (2007)
  5. "Văn học so sánh ở Việt Nam từ 1986 đến nay" (2013)[URL]
  6. Casanova, Pascale, "M B DeBevoise dịch" (2004), Harvard University Press
  7. Cheah, Pheng, "The Material World of Comparison", New Literary History, 40(3), pp.523~545 (2009)
  8. Cooppan, Vilashini, "Ghost in the Disciplinary Machine: The Uncanny Life of World Literature", Comparative Literature Studies, 41(1), pp.10~36 (2004)
  9. Đảng cộng sản Việt Nam, "Văn kiện hội nghị lần thứ tư Ban chap hành Trung ương, khóa VII" (1993), Lưu hành nội bộ
  10. Den Tandt, Christophe, "Reading Without Maps?: Cultural Landmarks in a Post-canonical Age : a Tribute to Gilbert Debusscher", pp.17~32 (2005), Peter Lang
  11. Friedman, Susan Stanford, "Why Not Compare?", PMLA, 126(3), pp.753~762 (2011)
  12. Gugelberge, Georg M, "Decolonizing the Canon: Considerations of Third World Literature", New Literary History, 22(3), pp.505~524 (1991)
  13. Guillory, John, "Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation" (1993), University of Chicago Press
  14. Felski, Rita, "Comparison: Theories, Approaches, Uses" (2013), Johns Hopkins University Press
  15. Huggan, Graham, "The Postcolonial Exotic: Marketing the Margins" (2001), NXB Routledge
  16. Kapek, Karel, "R. U. R. (Rossum’s Universal Robots)" (2004), Penguin Classics
  17. Lê, Từ Hiển, "Văn học so sánh - Từ ô cửa đến chân trời" (2017), Social Science Press, Hanoi
  18. Lưu, Quang Vũ, "Tác phẩm chọn lọc" (2017), Nhà xuất bản Sân khấu
  19. Lưu, Văn Bổng, "Văn học so sánh – Lý luận và ứng dụng" (2001), Social Science Press
  20. Lưu, Văn Bổng, "Những bình diện chủ yếu của văn học so sánh" (2004), Social Science Press
  21. Lưu, Văn Bổng, "Văn học so sánh - Một khoa học kết liên phức hợp" (2017), Social Science Press
  22. Mignolo, Walter, "On Comparison: Who Is Comparing What and Why? Comparison: Theories, Approaches, Uses", pp.99~119 (2013), Johns Hopkins University Press
  23. "‘World,’ ‘Globe,’ ‘Planet’: Comparative Literature, Planetary Studies, and Cultural Debt after the Global Turn. American Comparative Literature Association, the 2014-2015 Report on the State of the Discipline of Comparative Literature" (2014)[URL]
  24. Nguyễn, Văn Dân, "Những vấn đề lý luận của văn học so sánh" (1995), Social Science Press
  25. Nguyễn, Văn Dân, "Lý luận văn học so sánh" (1998), Social Science Press
  26. Nguyễn, Văn Dân, "Nghiên cứu văn học lý luận và ứng dụng" (1999), Hanoi University of Education Press
  27. Nixon, Rob, "Postcolonial Studies and Beyond", pp.33~51 (2005), Duke University Press
  28. Phương Lựu, "Từ văn học so sánh đến thi học so sánh" (2002), NXB Văn học
  29. Spivak, Gayatri, "Rethinking Comparativism", New Literary History, 40, pp.609~626 (2009)
  30. Huggan, Graham, "The Postcolonial Exotic: Marketing the Margins" (2001), NXB Routledge
  31. Said, Edward, "Orientalism" (2014), Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group
  32. Thomsen, Mads Rosendahl, "Mapping World Literature: International Canonization and Transnational Literatures" (2008), Continuum Literary Studies
  33. Trần Đình Sử, "Văn học so sánh nghiên cứu và triển vọng" (2005), Hanoi University of Education Press
  34. Trần Đình Sử, "Cơ sở văn học so sánh" (2020), NXB Đại học Sư phạm
  35. Upstone, Sara, "Spatial Politics in the Postcolonial Novel" (2009), Ashgate
  36. Zinoman, Peter, "Vietnamese Colonial Republican: The Political Vision of Vũ Trọng Phụng" (2014), University of California Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)