Relative Importance of Constituting Factors of Safety Culture -Focusing on PRIVATE SECURITY in Republic of KOREA-
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As complex risk factors become routinized, social safety and safety culture are gaining attention as important social issues. Emphasis on safety culture reflects the fact that the need for social control over complex risk factors keeps increasing. It is difficult, however, to quantify safety culture as it has intangible and qualitative characteristics. Although it can be managed and improved with qualitative data, it can be managed and improved even more effectively when quantitative data are added. In the private security field, it is more important to understand safety culture as a profession which implements safety-related tasks and manages safety. Even though Korea has undergone various incidents and accidents on a continual basis due to its compressed economic development, understanding and efforts on safety culture have been deficient owing to lack of awareness and non-systematic activities conducted by the private sector. This study found out assessment factors which constitute safety culture through DHP technique and drew out relative importance of the factors constituting the safety culture. As a result of the 1st Delphi analysis, a total of 73 factors of safety culture were drawn out and, through literature review on the preceding studies and meeting of the experts on researches, individual factors were finally classified into safety value, safety attitude, safety behavior and safety knowledge while organizational factors were classified into safety atmosphere, safety procedure, safety education and safety motivation, totaling 73 factors. Based on the results of the 2nd Delphi, 6 factors with CVR values less than 1.0 and average less than 3.0, which were 1 item of safety attitude, 1 item of safety atmosphere, 2 items of safety procedure and 2 items of safety motive, were deleted, finalizing 67 items. In the 3rd AHP analysis, paired comparison was conducted on 67 factors and weights for each factor and their priority order were drawn out. Among the constituting factors of safety culture, safety value and safety motive had highest weights, followed in descending order by safety behavior, safety atmosphere, safety attitude, safety education, safety procedure and safety Knowledge. Although some factors among those which were studied and drawn out by this study are relatively insignificant, even those factors need to be handled carefully as they also constitute safety culture. This study is expected to work as the basic data and to maintain a high level without compromising any one of the factors. In addition, subsequent studies by other researchers should prevent and prepare for various risks through integrated and long-term management of safety culture, not randomly and sporadically handled by industry, region and occupation. Studies on safety have been conducted through history and will also continue with the history of humanity. In the process of these studies, quantification of phenomena related to safety will work as a cornerstone for a higher level of research activities through measurement and comparison.
Abstract
As complex risk factors become routinized, social safety and safety culture are gaining attention as important social issues. Emphasis on safety culture reflects the fact that the need for social control over complex risk factors keeps increasing. It is difficult, however, to quantify safety culture as it has intangible and qualitative characteristics. Although it can be managed and improved with qualitative data, it can be managed and improved even more effectively when quantitative data are added. In the private security field, it is more important to understand safety culture as a profession which implements safety-related tasks and manages safety. Even though Korea has undergone various incidents and accidents on a continual basis due to its compressed economic development, understanding and efforts on safety culture have been deficient owing to lack of awareness and non-systematic activities conducted by the private sector. This study found out assessment factors which constitute safety culture through DHP technique and drew out relative importance of the factors constituting the safety culture. As a result of the 1st Delphi analysis, a total of 73 factors of safety culture were drawn out and, through literature review on the preceding studies and meeting of the experts on researches, individual factors were finally classified into safety value, safety attitude, safety behavior and safety knowledge while organizational factors were classified into safety atmosphere, safety procedure, safety education and safety motivation, totaling 73 factors. Based on the results of the 2nd Delphi, 6 factors with CVR values less than 1.0 and average less than 3.0, which were 1 item of safety attitude, 1 item of safety atmosphere, 2 items of safety procedure and 2 items of safety motive, were deleted, finalizing 67 items. In the 3rd AHP analysis, paired comparison was conducted on 67 factors and weights for each factor and their priority order were drawn out. Among the constituting factors of safety culture, safety value and safety motive had highest weights, followed in descending order by safety behavior, safety atmosphere, safety attitude, safety education, safety procedure and safety Knowledge. Although some factors among those which were studied and drawn out by this study are relatively insignificant, even those factors need to be handled carefully as they also constitute safety culture. This study is expected to work as the basic data and to maintain a high level without compromising any one of the factors. In addition, subsequent studies by other researchers should prevent and prepare for various risks through integrated and long-term management of safety culture, not randomly and sporadically handled by industry, region and occupation. Studies on safety have been conducted through history and will also continue with the history of humanity. In the process of these studies, quantification of phenomena related to safety will work as a cornerstone for a higher level of research activities through measurement and comparison.
참고문헌 (12)
- The Study on Legal Maintenance for Safety Culture Settlement, "Na CJ", Korea Legislation Research Institute, ~ (2014)
- 김성연, "안전문화요인이 안전행태에 미치는 영향 : 조직 내 커뮤니케이션을 중심으로", 박사, 미디어커뮤니케이션학과, pp.2014
- Hannaford E, "Supervisors Guide to Human Relations", National Safety Council, ~ (1976)
- Garavan TN, "An Investigation into the Relationship between Safety Climate and Safety Behaviours in Irish Organisations", Irish Journal of Management, 22(1), pp.141~170 (2004)
- 신현정, "생활 안전에 대한 유아의 지식, 행동, 위험요소예측능력에 관한 연구", 유아교육연구, 27(6), pp.273~293 (2007), 한국유아교육학회[DOI]
- Neal A, "A Study of the Lagged Relationships among Safety Climate Safety Motivation Safety Behaviors and Accidents at the Individual and Group Levels", Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), pp.946~955 (2006)
- Guldenmund FW, "The Use of Questionnaires in Safety Culture Researchan Evaluation", Safety Science, 45(6), pp.723~743 (2007)
- Christoffel T, "Injury Prevention and Public Health Practical Knowledge Skills and Strategies" (2006), Jones & Bartlett Learning
- Private Security Standards and Goals from the Official Private Security Task Force Report, "Arthur J Bilk", Anderson, ~ (1977)
- Kwon YJ, "A Study on the Identification of Assessment Criteria for Safety Culture in Railway Industry", The Korea Society for Railway, 5, pp.1687~1690 (2009)
- Park KH, "A Study on the Factors Influencing Safety Culture Focused on Industrial Workers", 석사, pp.2011
- 이관형, "안전문화와 효율적 안전경영 방안 연구", 대한안전경영과학회지, 7(3), pp.1~16 (2005), 대한안전경영과학회
