본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Analysis on the Factors Influencing Government’s R&D Investment Outcome in the IT Industry

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of government’s R&D investment outcome on the IT industry. The analysis of R&D investment outcome developed emphasizing qualitative outcome more than quantitative outcome. However, it is still leaning on technological outcome-centered methods, having relatively little interest in inputs that actually determine the outcome. Thus, this study intends to focus on the qualitative attributes of input resources. The results of the empirical analysis can be summarized as follows. In raising technological outcome and commercialization outcome of R&D investment, more funds per researcher and numbers of researchers and a longer development period had positive effects. However, a higher ratio of doctors had positive effects only on technological outcome (papers and patents), It is believed that leading to commercialization outcome needed a long period, but the period of task development was only an average of two years. On the contrary, collaboration had negative effects on technological process, which indicates that collaboration between two organizations having conflicting interests would lead to negative effects on the outcome. The results show that the qualitative attributes of input resources have significant effects on R&D investment outcome, and imply that it is necessary to emphasize the qualitative attributes from the input stage to promote government’s R&D investment outcome in the future.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of government’s R&D investment outcome on the IT industry. The analysis of R&D investment outcome developed emphasizing qualitative outcome more than quantitative outcome. However, it is still leaning on technological outcome-centered methods, having relatively little interest in inputs that actually determine the outcome. Thus, this study intends to focus on the qualitative attributes of input resources. The results of the empirical analysis can be summarized as follows. In raising technological outcome and commercialization outcome of R&D investment, more funds per researcher and numbers of researchers and a longer development period had positive effects. However, a higher ratio of doctors had positive effects only on technological outcome (papers and patents), It is believed that leading to commercialization outcome needed a long period, but the period of task development was only an average of two years. On the contrary, collaboration had negative effects on technological process, which indicates that collaboration between two organizations having conflicting interests would lead to negative effects on the outcome. The results show that the qualitative attributes of input resources have significant effects on R&D investment outcome, and imply that it is necessary to emphasize the qualitative attributes from the input stage to promote government’s R&D investment outcome in the future.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. "OECD Homepage"[URL]
  2. 설원식, "ICT 분야 국가연구개발사업에 대한 성과분석 개선을 위한 정책제언", 디지털융복합연구, 15(5), pp.151~159 (2017), 한국디지털정책학회[DOI]
  3. 2015 Survey of research and development in Korea, "Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning", ~ (2016)
  4. Fang-Ming Hsu, "Measuring relative efficiency of government-sponsored R&D projects: A three-stage approach", Evaluation and Program Planning, 32(2), pp.178~186 (2009), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  5. 윤신혜, "국가 에너지R&D사업의 성과활용 및 확산 영향요인 분석", 석사, 기술경영학과, pp.2013
  6. 김현민, "정부R&D과제 협력요소들과 연구개발 성과의 관계에 대한 연구 : 연구원 수와 연구개발단계의 조절효과를 중심으로", 대한경영학회지, 26(3), pp.695~718 (2013), 대한경영학회
  7. 이후성, "정부 R&D지원 유형에 따른 중소기업 기술적 성과 분석", 기술혁신학회지, 18(1), pp.73~97 (2015), 한국기술혁신학회
  8. 최지영, "국가연구개발사업의 기술적 성과창출 영향요인에 관한 연구: 기계 및 화학 산업 기술개발사례를 중심으로", 기술혁신학회지, 19(1), pp.161~190 (2016), 한국기술혁신학회
  9. 최상선, "해양수산 연구개발사업 성과분석 연구", 한국해양환경•에너지학회지, 19(2), pp.165~171 (2016), 한국해양환경·에너지학회
  10. Oliviero A. Carboni, "The effect of public support on investment and R&D: An empirical evaluation on European manufacturing firms", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, pp.282~295 (2017), Elsevier BV[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)