본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『바를람과 요사팥』라틴어 두 판본의 비교

A comparative study of two Latin versions of the Barlaam et Iosaphat

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Barlaam et Iosaphat, the Latin version of the story of the Saints Barlaam and Josaphat in the Middle Ages, is handed down to us in two independent versions. The first version of the text is preserved in a single manuscript of the Biblioteca Nazionale di Napoli in Naples (MS. VIII. B. 10). The other version, or the vulgata version, is found in about sixty manuscripts copied in from the twelfth to the sixteenth century, and this Latin vulgata version was translated into European languages in the Middle Ages, including French and Spanish. Both the Naples and the vulgata version are in turn the translation of the Greek text, which first appeared in the tenth century. The great numbers of manuscripts and editions of the text in various European languages and also the vast area where the text is found prove the popularity of the text in the Middle Ages. Barlaam et Iosaphat is a hagiography of the Saint Josaphat, who was converted into Christianity in his youth and came to lead a hermit's life in the desert and then later became a Saint. This text contains many parables, religious debates, numerous biblical quotations, and, interestingly enough, some traces of the Buddha legend. The motives from the Buddha legend are mainly found in the first five chapters of Barlaam et Iosaphat, which are about the young prince's experience of the bitterness of life by seeing the sick, the disabled, and the aged person for the first time in his life. In this article I attempted to compare the two Latin versions of the text, focusing on the part of Chapter five, where the motives from the Buddha legend are most visible. In comparing the two versions, I examined both of the Latin versions against the Greek original and thereby found several different renderings in each Latin version of the Greek words and phrases. It seems that the vulgata version is more faithful to the Greek original, translating almost word by word. On the other hand the Naples version shows more additions to and paraphrases of the Greek sentences, thus creating not a mere translated text, but a new Latinized version of the text, stylistically finer and more finished.

Abstract

Barlaam et Iosaphat, the Latin version of the story of the Saints Barlaam and Josaphat in the Middle Ages, is handed down to us in two independent versions. The first version of the text is preserved in a single manuscript of the Biblioteca Nazionale di Napoli in Naples (MS. VIII. B. 10). The other version, or the vulgata version, is found in about sixty manuscripts copied in from the twelfth to the sixteenth century, and this Latin vulgata version was translated into European languages in the Middle Ages, including French and Spanish. Both the Naples and the vulgata version are in turn the translation of the Greek text, which first appeared in the tenth century. The great numbers of manuscripts and editions of the text in various European languages and also the vast area where the text is found prove the popularity of the text in the Middle Ages. Barlaam et Iosaphat is a hagiography of the Saint Josaphat, who was converted into Christianity in his youth and came to lead a hermit's life in the desert and then later became a Saint. This text contains many parables, religious debates, numerous biblical quotations, and, interestingly enough, some traces of the Buddha legend. The motives from the Buddha legend are mainly found in the first five chapters of Barlaam et Iosaphat, which are about the young prince's experience of the bitterness of life by seeing the sick, the disabled, and the aged person for the first time in his life. In this article I attempted to compare the two Latin versions of the text, focusing on the part of Chapter five, where the motives from the Buddha legend are most visible. In comparing the two versions, I examined both of the Latin versions against the Greek original and thereby found several different renderings in each Latin version of the Greek words and phrases. It seems that the vulgata version is more faithful to the Greek original, translating almost word by word. On the other hand the Naples version shows more additions to and paraphrases of the Greek sentences, thus creating not a mere translated text, but a new Latinized version of the text, stylistically finer and more finished.

참고문헌 (9)

  1. "『바를람과 조사팥』라틴어 판본의 필사본 전통 연구 (1)", 7(1), pp.227~246 (2005), 지중해연구소
  2. "Monte Cassino's teachers and library in the High Middle Ages", pp.563~605 (1972)
  3. "El manuscrito VIII.B.10 de la Biblioteca Nacional de Npoles, primera traduccin latina de la redaccin bizantina de la Vida de Barlaam y Josafat", pp.225~241 (1997), Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientficas
  4. "Fuentes de la citas bblicas en las versiones romances de la Vida de Barlaam y Josafat", pp.243~253 (1997), Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientficas
  5. "Barlaam et Iosaphat: versin vulgata latina con la traduccin castellana de Juan de Arce Solorceno (1608) Neuva Roma 12" (2001), Barcelona: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientficas Universitat Autnoma de Barcelona
  6. "when and by whom was the Greek Barlaam and Ioasaph not written", pp.1187~1209 (1988)
  7. "Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies University of London", pp.306~325 (1955)
  8. "The life of the Blessed Iodasaph a new oriental Christian version of the Barlaam and Ioasaph romance Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies University of London", pp.389~407 (1957)
  9. "The legend of Barlaam and Joasaph in Byzantium and in the Romance Europe", pp.331~340 (1957)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)