고전장원과 장원농민의 신분 -9세기 초엽 생제르맹데프레 수도원영지의 경우-
Classical Manor and Status of Peasant on the Estate of St. Germain-des-Prés Abbey in the Early 9th Century
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
According to the original type of feudal holding system, the status of the tenant must be the same as that of peasant’s holding. Nevertheless, the percentage of discordance is 12% on the classical manors of St. Germain-des-Prés Abbey in Paris during the 820s. Besides, the connection of tenant’s burden with his status weakened, duties imposed on each status of holdings were similar to each other, and the burden of peasant had no relation with his status. Such weakened influence of ancient status system means the decay of slavery. But serfdom of legal and positional order didn’t as yet come into existence. However, poll tax was spreading widely regardless of status and land holding, lord’s interest and intervention in exogamy were great, and there were partly holding transfer-tax which suggests ‘mainmorte’. So, we can say that basically the serfdom in the meaning of production relation centering on the performance of labor services, operated in the classical manors of the early 9th century. Serfdom in the legal and positional meaning was forming widely and slowly while production relation of serfdom was developing.
Abstract
According to the original type of feudal holding system, the status of the tenant must be the same as that of peasant’s holding. Nevertheless, the percentage of discordance is 12% on the classical manors of St. Germain-des-Prés Abbey in Paris during the 820s. Besides, the connection of tenant’s burden with his status weakened, duties imposed on each status of holdings were similar to each other, and the burden of peasant had no relation with his status. Such weakened influence of ancient status system means the decay of slavery. But serfdom of legal and positional order didn’t as yet come into existence. However, poll tax was spreading widely regardless of status and land holding, lord’s interest and intervention in exogamy were great, and there were partly holding transfer-tax which suggests ‘mainmorte’. So, we can say that basically the serfdom in the meaning of production relation centering on the performance of labor services, operated in the classical manors of the early 9th century. Serfdom in the legal and positional meaning was forming widely and slowly while production relation of serfdom was developing.
참고문헌 (40)
- 김경현, "노비⋅농노⋅노예―예속민의 비교사―", pp.25~73 (1998), 일조각
- 김형인, "노비⋅농노⋅노예", pp.74~125 (1998)
- 이기영, "초기 프랑크사회에서의 로마인의 지위", 서양사연구, (4), pp.115~152 (1982), 서양사연구회
- 이기영, "고전장원과 장원농민의 신분−9세기 중엽 랭스의 생르미 수도원영지의 경우−", 역사교육, (35), pp.153~183 (1984), 역사교육연구회
- 이기영, "유럽사의 구조와 전환", pp.385~411 (1993), 느티나무
- 李 琪 榮, "서유럽 중세 초기 노예제사회로부터 농노제로의 이행과정", 역사교육, (99), pp.251~292 (2006), 역사교육연구회
- 이기영, "고전장원제 하 농민보유지의 종류별 크기와 영주직영지와의 크기관계", 역사와경계, (69), pp.339~390 (2008), 부산경남사학회
- 이기영, "고전적 형태의 봉건적 부역노동 부과방식 -파리 분지의 중심부 영지들을 중심으로-", 서양중세사연구, (32), pp.1~51 (2013), 한국서양중세사학회
- 이기영, "농노제와 노예제의 개념 규정에 대한 재검토", 역사교육, (136), pp.227~254 (2015), 역사교육연구회[DOI]
- 차전환, "로마 제정사 연구", pp.175~206 (2000), 서울대 출판부
- 이기영, "고전장원제와 봉건적 부역노동제도의 형성―서유럽 대륙지역을중심으로―" (2015), 사회평론
- Bloch, M, "Slavery and Serfdom in the Middle Ages. Selected Essays. Berkeley", pp.33~91 (1975), Univ. of California Press
- Bloch, M, "The Cambridge Economic History of Europe", pp.235~290 (1971), Cambridge Univ. Press
- Bonnassie, P, "Encyclopedia of the Middle Ages, Vol. II", pp.1339~ (2000), Fitzroy Dearborn
- Bonnassie, P, "From Slavery to Feudalism in South-Western Europe", pp.1~59 (1991), Cambridge Univ. Press
- Davies, W, "Serfdom and Slavery: Studies in Legal Bondage", pp.225~246 (1996), Longman
- Goetz, H. -W, "Serfdom and the beginnings of a ‘seigneurial system’ in the Carolingian period: a survey of the evidence", Early Medieval Europe, 2(1), pp.29~51 (1960)
- Herlihy, D, "The Carolingian Mansus", Economic Historical Review, 13, pp.79~89 (1960)
- Anderson, P., "Passages from Antiquity to Feudalism" (1978), Verso
- Finley, M. I., "서양고대경제" (1993), 민음사
- Finley, M. I., "고대 노예제와 모던 이데올로기" (1998), 민음사
- Poly J. -P., "The Feudal Transformation: 900-1200" (1991), Holmes & Meier
- Verhulst, A, "Carolingian Economy" (2002), Cambridge Univ. Press
- Bonnassie, P, "La France de l’an mil", pp.125~141 (1990), Seuil
- Devroey, J. -P, "Décrire, inventorier, enregistrer entre Seine et Rhin au Moyen Âge", pp.53~86 (2012)
- Perrin, Ch. E., "Le servage en France et en Allemagne", Relazioni del Xe Congresso Internationale di Scienze, III, pp.213~245 (1955)
- Boutruche, R., "Seigneurie et féodalté, I. Le premier âge des liens d’homme à homme" (1959), Aubier
- Elmshäuser K., "Studien zum Polyp. von St. Germain" (1993), Böhlau
- Fossier, R., "La société médiévale" (1994), Armand Colin
- Ganshof, F. L, "Observations sur le <<manse>> à l’époque merovingienne", Revue historique de droit français et étranger, 33, pp.633~ (1955)
- Goetz, H. -W, "La Neustrie. Les pays au nord de la Loire de 650 à 850", pp.505~522 (1989)
- Guérard, B., "Polyptyque de l’abbaye Irminon … de l’abbaye de Saint-Germain-des-Prés sous le régne de Charlemagne, Vol. 1. Prolégomè nes, Commentaires et Éclaircissements" (1844), L’Imprimerie royale
- Guérard, B., "Polyptyque de St. Germain, Vol. 2 Polyptyque" (1844), L’Imprimerie royale
- Hägermann, D., "Das Polyptychon von Saint-Germain-des-Prés" (1993), Böhlau
- Kuchenbuch, L., "Grundherrschaft im früheren Mittelalter" (1991), Schulz-Kirchner
- Longnon, A., "Polyptyque de St. Germain-des-Prés, Première partie. Texte du polyptyque" (1863), H. Champion
- Monumenta Historica Germaniae, "Legum tomus III" (1965), Hahn
- Nehlsen, H., "Sklavenrecht zwischen Antike und Mittelalter, Bd. I: Ostgoten, Westgotwn, Franken, Langobarden, Göttingen, Frankfurt, Zürich" (1972)
- Niermeyer, J. E., "Mediae Latinitatis Lexicon Minus" (1984), E. J. Brill
- Perroy, E., "Le monde Carolingienne" (1974), SEDES