본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Functional Convergence factor and Usability Evaluation of The Range of Use of The Smart Automatic Urine Disposer

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Recently, devices that help the general public's urination activity have been developed, but products that take into account the user's urination habits, device functions, and user accessibility are still insufficient. This study conducted a usability evaluation to find user satisfaction and improvement points of products based on smart automatic urine disposer that have convergence and complex functions such as automatic suction functions. There are 21 indicators used in usability evaluation, and were developed based on safety, operability, and satisfaction. As a result, functional satisfaction was high, but in terms of design, problems to be improved such as handles were presented. Therefore, through this study, it was found that the satisfaction of the automatic urine disposer in terms of performance cannot be representative of the product, and the importance of developing usability evaluation index to find product problems.

Abstract

Recently, devices that help the general public's urination activity have been developed, but products that take into account the user's urination habits, device functions, and user accessibility are still insufficient. This study conducted a usability evaluation to find user satisfaction and improvement points of products based on smart automatic urine disposer that have convergence and complex functions such as automatic suction functions. There are 21 indicators used in usability evaluation, and were developed based on safety, operability, and satisfaction. As a result, functional satisfaction was high, but in terms of design, problems to be improved such as handles were presented. Therefore, through this study, it was found that the satisfaction of the automatic urine disposer in terms of performance cannot be representative of the product, and the importance of developing usability evaluation index to find product problems.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 윤혜정, "지적장애인 생활재활교사의 구강보건실천에 영향을 미치는 요인", 한국구강보건과학회지, 8(4), pp.8~15 (2020), 한국구강보건과학회[DOI]
  2. H. M. Choi, "Current Status of Automatic Urine Disposal System Development in U.S.A", Rehabilitation Engineering And Assistive Technology Society of Korea, 2016(11), pp.207~210 (2016)
  3. 한정석, "기저귀 사용실태와 피부자극도 조사", 한국모자보건학회지, 4(1), pp.93~102 (2000), 한국모자보건학회
  4. 이효정, "일체형 천기저귀의 실태조사 및 소재 평가", 한국생활과학회지, 26(2), pp.133~144 (2017), 한국생활과학회[DOI]
  5. 문인혁, "다중센서를 적용한 자동배변처리기용 제어기 설계", 재활복지공학회논문지, 5(1), pp.71~77 (2011), 한국재활복지공학회
  6. 이민혜, "ICT 기반 실버케어를 고려한 웨어러블 디바이스 설계", 한국정보통신학회논문지, 22(10), pp.1347~1354 (2018), 한국정보통신학회[DOI]
  7. 임경춘, "시설거주 노인의 요실금과 기저귀 착용 경험", 근관절건강학회지, 26(2), pp.90~101 (2019), 대한근관절건강학회[DOI]
  8. J. H. Ku, "Voiding Diary for the Evaluation of Urinary Incontinence and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms : Prospective Assessment of Patient Compliance and Burden", Neurourology Urodynamics, 23(4), pp.331~335 (2004)[DOI]
  9. Elizabeth Bright, "Urinary diaries: Evidence for the development and validation of diary content, format, and duration", Neurourology and Urodynamics, 30(3), pp.348~352 (2011), Wiley[DOI]
  10. 박유경, "사상 체질별 대소변 소증에 대한 체계적 고찰 연구", 사상체질의학회지, 30(3), pp.24~39 (2018), 사상체질의학회[DOI]
  11. 김용태, "과민성방광", Kidney Research and Clinical Practice, 30(2), pp.225~227 (2011), 대한신장학회
  12. 조정만, "전립선비대증 환자에서 치료 후 야간뇨의 변화", International Neurourology Journal, 9(1), pp.23~27 (2005), 대한배뇨장애요실금학회
  13. "ISO 9241-11, Ergonomics requirements for office with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 11:Guidance on usability", International Organization for Standardization, ~ (1998)
  14. N. Bevan, "ISO 9241-11Revised: What Have We Learnt About Usability Since 1998", International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, LNCS 9169, pp.143~151 (2015)
  15. Y. N. Cho, "The Effect of Cognitive Rehabilitation Training Using Workbooks on Cognitive Function in Patients with Brain Injury", The Journal Of Korean Soceity Of Cognitive Rehabilitation, 9(1), pp.27~40 (2020)
  16. 장덕현, "리커트형 척도의 중간점은 필요한가?: 중간점 있는 척도와 없는 척도 간 측정 결과 비교", 조사연구, 18(4), pp.1~24 (2017), 한국조사연구학회[DOI]
  17. C. H. LAWSHE, "A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY", Personnel Psychology, 28(4), pp.563~575 (1975), Wiley[DOI]
  18. J. Nielsen, "A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems", Proceedings of the Interact '93 & Chi '93 Conference : Human Factors in Computing Systems, 5(1), pp.206~213 (1993)
  19. B. Sullivan., "Designing Web Usability : The Practice of Simplicity", Technical Communication, 47(3), pp.411~413 (2000)[DOI]
  20. Ernest C. Davenport, "Reliability, Dimensionality, and Internal Consistency as Defined by Cronbach: Distinct Albeit Related Concepts", Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(4), pp.4~9 (2015), Wiley[DOI]
  21. Jongseo Kim, "A methodology for developing a usability index of consumer electronic products", International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 38(3-4), pp.333~345 (2008), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  22. Ebba Thora Hvannberg, "Heuristic evaluation: Comparing ways of finding and reporting usability problems", Interacting with Computers, 19(2), pp.225~240 (2007), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (42건)