메데이아의 젠더 갈등과 원형적 여성성의 양가성
Medea’s Gender Trouble and the Ambivalence of Archetypal Femininity
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This thesis attempts to explain the ambivalence of Medea’s character and the reasons for the change in the object and method of her revenge in Euripides’ works. First, in order to analyze the cause of Medea’s anger, it is analyzed whether the object of anger has any reason to despise the subject of anger in terms of personal abilities and political rights. In the patriarchal society of ancient Greece, Medea reveals a characteristic that subverts femininity and masculinity. It can be seen that gender trouble occurs when Medea is defined by universal femininity or when a specific gender identity is given. Next, I would like to analyze the characteristics of Medea’s anger state. Medea has a double-layered and ambivalent character rather than contradictory. It is clearly distinguished before and after Iason’s betrayal. It seems that Medea’s character was expressed in a transformed form by undifferentiating and integrating the opposing characteristics of archetypal femininity. Medea’s anger wants self-destruction and death toward Medea’s “self,” the subject of anger, and the other’s destruction and death toward the “other,” the object of anger. Finally, I would like to analyze the main causes of changing the scope and method of Medea’s revenge. In the ancient Greek patriarchy, the division of the private and public realms hierarchically ordered the status of women and men. As Medea amplifies her anger through agonic conversations with others in the public realm, specific means and methods of revenge are selected and the scope of revenge is determined.
Abstract
This thesis attempts to explain the ambivalence of Medea’s character and the reasons for the change in the object and method of her revenge in Euripides’ works. First, in order to analyze the cause of Medea’s anger, it is analyzed whether the object of anger has any reason to despise the subject of anger in terms of personal abilities and political rights. In the patriarchal society of ancient Greece, Medea reveals a characteristic that subverts femininity and masculinity. It can be seen that gender trouble occurs when Medea is defined by universal femininity or when a specific gender identity is given. Next, I would like to analyze the characteristics of Medea’s anger state. Medea has a double-layered and ambivalent character rather than contradictory. It is clearly distinguished before and after Iason’s betrayal. It seems that Medea’s character was expressed in a transformed form by undifferentiating and integrating the opposing characteristics of archetypal femininity. Medea’s anger wants self-destruction and death toward Medea’s “self,” the subject of anger, and the other’s destruction and death toward the “other,” the object of anger. Finally, I would like to analyze the main causes of changing the scope and method of Medea’s revenge. In the ancient Greek patriarchy, the division of the private and public realms hierarchically ordered the status of women and men. As Medea amplifies her anger through agonic conversations with others in the public realm, specific means and methods of revenge are selected and the scope of revenge is determined.
참고문헌 (37)
- 장영란, "에우리피데스의 메데이아의 이아손의 무지와 아이도스", 문화와융합, 42(11), pp.1039~1065 (2020), 한국문화융합학회
- 장영란, "아리스토텔레스의 분노의 적절성 문제와 『일리아스』의 사례", 문화와융합, 40(4), pp.1~32 (2018), 한국문화융합학회[DOI]
- 장영란, "신화속의 여성, 여성속의 신화" (2001), 문예출판사
- 정준영, "메데이아의 자식살해와 튀모스(thymos)", 서양고전학연구, (45), pp.91~128 (2011), 한국서양고전학회
- 최혜영, "에우리피데스의『메데이아』와 펠로폰네소스 전쟁 : 그리스 비극의 한 역사적 콘텍스트", 세계 역사와 문화 연구, (18), pp.1~20 (2008), 한국세계문화사학회
- 최혜영, "그리스 비극에 나타난 젠더와 아테네 제국주의-아이스킬로스 『오레스테이아』를 중심으로-", 외국문학연구, (29), pp.431~448 (2008), 외국문학연구소
- 최혜영, "고대 그리스 사회 내의 젠더 개념과 역할", 젠더와 사회, 6(1) (2007)
- Allan, W, "Euripides: Medea" (2002), Duckworth
- Apollodoros, "The Library, Loeb Classical Library" (1921), Harvard University Press
- Aristotle, "On Rhetoric" (1991), Oxford University Press
- Aristotle, "Loeb Classical Library 193" (1926), Harvard University Press
- 시학, "수사학", pp.2017, Aristotle
- Aristotle, "Loeb Classical Library 264" (1932), Harvard University Press
- Aristotle, "Loeb Classical Library 199" (1995), Harvard University Press
- Aristotle, "Loeb Classical Library 73" (1920), Harvard University Press
- Boedeker, Deborah, "Euripides’ Medea and the Vanity of Logoi", Classical Philology, 86(2) (1991), The University of California Press
- Boedeker, Deborah, "Oikos and Polis in the Medea: Patterns of the Heart and Mind", Anthos, 1(3) (1992)
- Bongie, Elizabeth Bryson, "Heroic Elements in the Medea of Euripides", Transactions of the American Philological Association, 107 (1977)
- Butler, Judith, "Gender Trouble" (1999), Routledge
- David Stuttard, "Looking and Medea" (2014), Bloomsbury
- Euripides, "Macleane, with commentary" (1857)
- Euripides, "Medea, the text edited with introduction and Commentary" (2001), Clarendon Press
- Gellie, George, "Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, no. 35" (1988), Oxford University Press
- Griffiths, Emma, "Medea" (2006), Routledge
- Hesiod, "Prolegomena and Commentary" (1966), Clarendon Press
- Homer, "A.T. Murray, Loeb Classical Library" (1966), Harvard University Press
- Jung, Karl, "원형과 무의식" (2002), 솔
- Jung, Karl, "Four Archetypes" (1959), Princeton University Press
- Kerenyi, K, "The Gods of the Greeks" (1951), Thames and Hudson
- Kerenyi, K, "Thames and Hudson" (1959)
- Knox, B. M. W, "The Medea of Euripides", Yale Classical Studies, 25, pp.193~225 (1977)
- Neumann, Erich, "The Great Mother" (1955), Princeton University
- Pausanias, "Description of Greece" (1918), Harvard University Press
- Powell, Anton, "Euripides, Women, and Sexuallity" (1990), Routledge
- Roisman, Hanna M, "Looking and Medea" (2014), Bloomsbury
- Swift, Laura, "A Companion to Euripides" (2017), Blackwell
- Williamson, Margaret, "Euripides, Women and Sexuality" (1990), Routledge